Cavisson NetStorm vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud comparison

Cavisson and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Cavisson is ranked #18, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Cavisson holds a 0.3% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cavisson users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Cavisson NetStorm

Read 3 Cavisson NetStorm reviews

251 Views
121 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 41 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

3,773 Views
2,234 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cavisson NetStorm

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetStorm and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Load Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cavisson NetStorm

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Cavisson NetStorm is 0.3%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 8.3%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1329360

Performance Architect at Kohl's

May 26, 2020

Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase

NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage. NetStorm has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase. One more great functionality is the ability to control the load runtime by increasing or decreasing the virtual users or pausing the users to keep on repeating the transactions without exiting.

Read full review

AlexLogan

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Jun 3, 2024

Has realistic scenario composition for performance tests and is highly scalable, but the user interface needs improvement

The solution generates traffic on the infrastructure, which resembles end users. Depending on the performance of the underlying infrastructure and nodes of the architecture, our company team can report on the scalability of applications. The solution performs two types of tests: user interface testing, which is implemented primarily in our organization for online banking, and the other one is API level testing for mobile banking. In terms of the feature set, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is a market-leading application that has been around for 20 years. I have been working with the solution throughout the acquisition stages; the product used to be much better when it was primarily managed by Mercury. There are limited AI capabilities in the solution; when I was personally operating some smart scenarios using the feature of auto-scaling, I found it unsatisfying. I would recommend the product to others based on its feature set and the level of support. I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as seven out of ten. There are no glaring weaknesses in the product, and it's good enough for its core purpose.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way."

"This tool helps to focus on real-time transactions that occur at a very high rate."

"NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

"The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."

"The solution can scale."

"This solution is SaaS based so we can utilize cloud technology, which is less time consuming and saves a lot of of money."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

Cons

"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."

"In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing."

"It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need."

"An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries."

"One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing."

"In terms of new features, they can natively integrate with Chaos engineering tools such as Chaos Monkey and AWS FIS. With LoadRunner, we can generate load, and if Chaos tools are also supported natively, it will help to get everything together."

"Scriptless automation is an area that can be improved."

"It should have a feature to report with a 99.9 percentile success rate."

"CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community."

"Some improvements can be made to the solution's user interface"

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NetStorm is priced well when compared to many well-known tools."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

24%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

The pricing is high compared to other licensing tools like NeoLoad. It's not excessively expensive but higher than NeoLoad. However, in my experience, clients often weigh NeoLoad and LoadRunner equ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

November 2024

Download Cavisson NetStorm product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

November 2024

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Learn More

Video not available

Cavisson

OpenText

Overview

Cavisson NetStorm is a powerful load testing solution that is designed to enable application developers to greatly improve the way their applications function. It employs advanced software that enables it to perform many different tasks. This flexibility gives administrators the ability to test their applications in the way that best meets their needs. Cavisson NetStorm offers users the ability to scale their testing environments. These aspects of the solution are only a couple of the reasons that this platform is the load testing tool of choice of several fortune 100 corporations.

Cavisson NetStorm Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Cavisson NetStorm include:

Cost-effectiveness. Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective solution that is well worth the price. The wealth of features and the sort of tasks that Cavisson NetStorm can be employed to accomplish make it possible for organizations to create products that perform at peak effectiveness. It starts with a free trial that becomes a quote-based price.

Ease of use. Cavisson NetStorm is intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. Its design saves developers time and makes organizations more productive.

High level of stability. Cavisson NetStorm users don’t need to be concerned that it will crash or suffer other performance-related issues when it handles large test loads. It is extremely stable and can easily handle heavy workloads without suffering from an outage. Administrators can let the solution do its work while maintaining peace of mind.

Gain deep insights into application behaviors. Administrators can leverage Cavisson NetStorm’s monitoring features to observe many different aspects of the application testing process. One such aspect is the way that the applications behave when they are exposed to certain environment types. Users can obtain in-depth insights as the tests run that will help them understand how their applications function in specific situations.

Cavisson NetStorm Features

Some of the many useful features Cavisson NetStorm has to offer include:

Diagnostic alert capabilities. Cavisson NetStorm allows users to create diagnostic warnings prior to the commencement of testing. These alerts warn users when deviations from their pre-set testing parameters are taking place. If the application is behaving in a way that is abnormal, these alerts will make sure that administrators are aware of what is going on.

Test result reporting tools. Cavisson NetStorm offers administrators the ability to create test result reports that can clearly lay out information belonging to a number of different categories. It has prefabricated reporting templates that enable users to illustrate the kinds of information that is most important to them.

Testing dashboards. Cavisson NetStorm comes with a central dashboard that can visually lay out various testing metrics for administrators to view. It also includes dashboards that enable users to view technical or business-related data exclusively.

Performance analysis. Cavisson NetStorm can analyze how specific components of the application are impacting its overall performance. If there is any portion that is negatively impacting its performance, Cavisson NetStorm’s analytical tools will find them so that administrators can remedy the problem.

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

October 2024

Free Report: Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.