Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codeium vs Devart dbForge Studio for SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Codeium
Ranking in IDE
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (1st)
Devart dbForge Studio for S...
Ranking in IDE
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Codeium?
Share your opinion
AM
Dec 9, 2019
Easy to use, quick data usage, and a helpful knowledge base
The only issue that I have is that it depends on hardware resources, it takes a lot, that is the only set back with the solution. What we are using is fine for now. I believe that the newer versions 2016 or 2018 SQL have improved a lot and have all of the features available. It would be useful to have some form of self-service capabilities or some form an AI to provide a summary and to be able to tell you what has happened. Also, the inclusion of some integration tools would be helpful. In the next release, I would like to see some form of artificial intelligence with some form of summaries telling you what has happened without having to get into a complex query to get that information.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Because it's 2012 version, it's a one-off enterprise license that we have never had to upgrade."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IDE solutions are best for your needs.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dell, Anduril, MongoDB, Zillow, Atlassian
Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Amazon Web Services (AWS), JetBrains and others in IDE. Updated: August 2024.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.