We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Symantec Web Isolation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."Provides improved security around having your credentials locked down and rotated regularly."
"Because we now have the ability to grant access to management utilities like DNS Manager, Sequel Studio, and MMC, in a secure fashion, without system admins being required to continually reenter various passwords that are stored who knows where, it has really made the system admin's job much easier. It has made the PSM's job much easier. It has made the auditor's job and the security team's job and the access manager's job significantly easier, because we're able to move much more quickly toward a role-based access management system, and that is really streamlining the whole onboarding/offboarding management process."
"It allows users to self-provision access to the accounts that they need."
"We have been able to manage application credentials in CyberArk, whether they come as a custom plugin or straight out-of-the-box."
"The product is an important security measure against credential theft. It ensures session isolation and password rotation including pushing passwords to the endpoints."
"Technical support has been very responsive in navigating challenges. It is very easy to open a ticket."
"You can gradually implement CyberArk, starting with more easily attainable goals."
"With CyberArk, you can be fully confident that your existing accounts are secure. You will be 100 percent"
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Web Isolation is the user-friendliness of the solution."
"It can be made user-friendly, in the sense of the console is pretty outdated."
"New functionalities and discovered bugs take longer to patch. We would greatly appreciate quicker development of security patches and bug corrections."
"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult. Some parts of its interface are not very intuitive. Some of the controls are hidden, and instead of having a screen with all the controls for that account on it, you have to use menus and other similar things."
"There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution."
"As they grow, the technical support is having growing pains. One of the things is just being able to get somebody on the phone sometimes."
"The product documentation has to be more precise in certain aspects with explanations for functionality limitations along with reference material or screenshots."
"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."
"Having a centralized place to manage the solution has been something that I have always wanted, and they are starting to understand that and bring things back together."
"Symantec Web Isolation could improve by reducing licensing costs."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Symantec Web Isolation is ranked 24th in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Symantec Web Isolation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Web Isolation writes "User-friendly, reliable, and good support". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Symantec Web Isolation is most compared with Menlo Security Secure Web Gateway.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.