Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Secrets Management vs Evidian Web Access Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Secrets Management
Ranking in Access Management
20th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (16th)
Evidian Web Access Manager
Ranking in Access Management
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Web Access Management (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

SP
Speedy secret retrieval with monitoring boosts efficiency but documentation needs enhancement
We occasionally experience incidents that delay password injection back into the script. Additionally, we've sometimes focused on vaulting instead of actively managing passwords, which is a concern that requires further exploration. I'm comparing the capabilities of Conjur and Secret Service with our existing products to ensure all our use cases are covered. Some features, like dynamic tokens for Azure and GCP, are already supported by other products but not yet by Conjur. Additionally, full support for GCP Secrets Manager and CyberArk needs confirmation. While Conjur has potential, implementation was complex and required professional services. Simplifying the setup process, particularly for Conjur Edge and Conjur Cloud, would be beneficial. Improving documentation, especially for daily tasks like creating safes, would make the product more user-friendly for those new to Conjur.
Use Evidian Web Access Manager?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
833,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Secrets Management?
CyberArk Secrets Management has a moderate pricing structure based on a per-tenant licensing model rather than a per-user account model like their PAM solution. This makes Conjur's cost comparative...
What needs improvement with CyberArk Secrets Management?
Improvements for CyberArk Secrets Management include enhanced documentation with more use cases and step-by-step integration guides. Thoroughly educating administrators on these aspects is crucial ...
What is your primary use case for CyberArk Secrets Management?
The primary use case for CyberArk Secrets Management is rotating credentials for all service accounts, especially those managed by Puppet for file deployment. This includes rotating AWS keys and cr...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Web Access Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Systel, Navantia, Winchester City Council, Copperchase Ltd
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2025.
833,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.