Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exact Macola ES vs PACE360 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Exact Macola ES
Ranking in ERP
38th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PACE360
Ranking in ERP
69th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user650007 - PeerSpot reviewer
it was (previously) not aesthetically pleasing. It's more user friendly, now. They changed the interface, so there's not so many duplicate screens.
The number one way they improved this product was something called workspaces. This is like a dashboard meant for, depending on your role with a specific organization, so maybe if you're in accounting and financials, you need to see accounts receivable, accounts payable, your general ledger, so you could set up a dashboard for when you first login -- to drill down into the most important parts of your job and requirements with the company that you need visibility into -- rather than having to start from scratch, so you could set up your own dashboard. Macola is user based, so say you have seven primary users in your company, say you have your president, your CFO, your controller, your accounting manager, your IT person, your operations person, and your warehouse manager, you can customize as many as you want, depending on how many users you buy and have each individual dashboard be tailored towards that individual and their job/role with the company.
Use PACE360?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Macola ES
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

good2grow
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: December 2024.
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.