Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortra's PhishLabs Threat Intelligence vs Group-IB Digital Risk Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's PhishLabs Threat I...
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (32nd)
Group-IB Digital Risk Prote...
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Digital Risk Protection category, the mindshare of Fortra's PhishLabs Threat Intelligence is 3.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Group-IB Digital Risk Protection is 2.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Risk Protection
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fortra's PhishLabs Threat Intelligence?
Share your opinion
JR
Apr 12, 2021
Broad protection, good stability, fast support, and reasonable pricing
It is in the early stage of innovation, but it has been developing constantly and rapidly. The room for improvements for this kind of solution is basically in terms of mapping between multiple resources. For example, if a fraudster or scammer is using Instagram to track potential customers of an organization, he might also use fraudulent resources of a website, mobile application, or instant messenger as a part of an elaborate scheme. Group-IB is working on mapping such related fraud resources so that they can see the whole pattern and then track the fraudster or scammer conducting the scheme. They could also improve the Risk Scoring Engine. Whenever any resource comes up in the monitoring section, there is an engine to score whether it is a high risk, low risk, or no risk, or whether it is legal for the customer. This part could be improved because different channels require different mechanisms for scoring the risk. On the website, it can score a risk easily, but for social media and instant messenger, some things need to be adjusted. It is not similar to monitoring a website.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"At the moment, its pricing is very reasonable for the whole work that Group-IB is doing for the banks. We can easily calculate the return on investment based on that pricing because the number of resources that need to be taken down would reach up to thousands within months. Its pricing is very reasonable for this kind of work. There is no hidden fee. It is subscription-based. There are different packages that are based on a limited or unlimited number of takedowns. It is very simple with no hidden fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
University
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
11%
Media Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

PhishLabs Platform
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, ZeroFOX, Proofpoint and others in Digital Risk Protection. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.