We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Qualys Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"The vulnerability management feature is a strong one. And also the patch management feature."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours."
"You can integrate your Burp Suite results and create an integrated report. Also, the way it shows the results - threats and exploit details - makes remediation very easy."
"QualysGuard web-based scanner is very useful for performing external penetration and PCI scans from remote locations."
"The interface is user-friendly and easy to understand."
"We have experienced quick customer support. They have a complete list of our previous issues along with our history, which makes it faster for them to solve issues."
"With our vulnerabilities under control, it's putting our services in compliance and minimizing our risk for exposure."
"The most valuable feature is that we are able to scan the services and put credentials like a user ID password. We can verify the vulnerability level."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The support could be faster."
"The solution needs to adjust its pricing. They should make it more affordable."
"The pricing does not seem to be competitive."
"The product's pricing could be better."
"Qualys Web Application Scanning is very complex to use, and its graphical interface is not very user-friendly."
"The UI is not user-friendly and you don't have a yearly reporting facility where you can slice and dice in different jobs."
"In terms of the Policy Compliance model which they currently have, not all the platforms are being covered. If they could improve on the Policy Compliance model, since there are policies which are benchmarked against it, this will be helpful for us."
"The GUI could be a little less complicated as it opens a lot of new windows for creating search lists, templates, reports, or for scanning purposes."
More Qualys Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Qualys Web Application Scanning is ranked 19th in Application Security Tools with 31 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Qualys Web Application Scanning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys Web Application Scanning writes "A stable solution that can be used for infrastructure vulnerability scanning and web application scanning". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Qualys Web Application Scanning is most compared with OWASP Zap, Veracode, SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify WebInspect.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.