Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infinite Blue vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Infinite Blue
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (38th), Low-Code Development Platforms (37th)
Oracle Java Cloud Service
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Infinite Blue and Oracle Java Cloud Service aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Infinite Blue is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Oracle Java Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 0.3% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Rapid Application Development Software
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Logisthead67 - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple solution with an easy setup and good stability
The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelilng The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy. The user interface should add some more functionality in the next…
Arkabrata  Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches
There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors. We're in the process of continuously fixing to address these issues, and once resolved, the application will be ready. I've worked on this internal system application, and I'll give you an example of our specific challenge. There was an issue involving a complex query where data was stored and retrieved from the database. The application also had a reporting component that wasn't generating reports or collecting the required information for Excel reports. To address this, I made changes to the query. I focused on the data format issue encountered in the implementation class. However, when implementing these changes under a specific thread, the application server showed an exception. I also made adjustments to resolve the issue.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelling."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"It is pretty easy to use."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
 

Cons

"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is somewhat expensive."
"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."
"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?
I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...
What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?
The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always someth...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Progress Rollbase, Rollbase
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pironet NDH, Jungle Lasers, Aintercarga SAS, ASPsoftware, Cloudselling
Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.