Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Intel FPGA vs Xilinx FPGA comparison

Intel and Xilinx are both solutions in the Enterprise FPGA category. Intel is ranked #3, while Xilinx is ranked #1. Intel holds a 16.3% mindshare in EF, compared to Xilinx’s 38.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Xilinx users are willing to recommend the solution.
Intel FPGA
  • 1,349 Views
  • 1,181 Comparison Views
Xilinx FPGA
Read 1 Xilinx FPGA review
  • 3,802 Views
  • 2,578 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Categories and Ranking

Intel FPGA
Ranking in Enterprise FPGA
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Xilinx FPGA
Ranking in Enterprise FPGA
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise FPGA category, the mindshare of Intel FPGA is 16.3%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xilinx FPGA is 38.5%, down from 42.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise FPGA
 

Featured Reviews

Use Intel FPGA?
Share your opinion
NP
Jun 23, 2022
Accessible, easy to install, quick to deploy, and has an up-to-date forum
We use the Xilinx platform Vivado for FPGA projects and student projects Xilinx work can be programmed using Xilinx Vivado Tools; we couldn't do it without it. We use Xilinx as intended for FPGA programming because it is one of two software that can be used for FPGA programming. The new…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The Academia license is free."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise FPGA solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
35%
University
12%
Educational Organization
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
11%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

Lattice FPGA vs Intel FPGA Logo
Lattice FPGA vs Intel FPGA
Compared 36% of the time
Microchip PolarFire vs Intel FPGA Logo
Microchip PolarFire vs Intel FPGA
Compared 21% of the time
More Intel FPGA Competitors
Microchip PolarFire vs Xilinx FPGA Logo
Microchip PolarFire vs Xilinx FPGA
Compared 44% of the time
Lattice FPGA vs Xilinx FPGA Logo
Lattice FPGA vs Xilinx FPGA
Compared 31% of the time
Achronix Speedster7t vs Xilinx FPGA Logo
Achronix Speedster7t vs Xilinx FPGA
Compared 4% of the time
QuickLogic FPGA vs Xilinx FPGA Logo
QuickLogic FPGA vs Xilinx FPGA
Compared 3% of the time
More Xilinx FPGA Competitors
 

Learn More

Intel
Xilinx
 

Overview

Intel® FPGAs offer a wide variety of configurable embedded SRAM, high-speed transceivers, high-speed I/Os, logic blocks, and routing. Built-in intellectual property (IP) combined with outstanding software tools lower FPGA development time, power, and cost.

Xilinx® 7 series FPGAs comprise four FPGA families that address the complete range of system requirements, ranging from low cost, small form factor,
cost-sensitive, high-volume applications to ultra high-end connectivity bandwidth, logic capacity, and signal processing capability for the most demanding
high-performance applications.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CERN, Alibaba Cloud, SK Telecom, Twitch, NetQuest, Ethernity Networks
See our list of best Enterprise FPGA vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise FPGA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.