Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JungleWorks Kato vs Splunk Enterprise Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

JungleWorks Kato
Ranking in Data Visualization
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk Enterprise Platform
Ranking in Data Visualization
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Data Visualization category, the mindshare of JungleWorks Kato is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Visualization
 

Featured Reviews

Use JungleWorks Kato?
Share your opinion
Mohan Battu - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 10, 2024
Offers timestamp indexing and the easy-to-use visualization for data analysis
I have a variety of use cases. My company uses it for cloud-related operations, anomaly identification, and threat detection It's been very useful in regard to security information and threat management (SIEM). Splunk is a valuable tool for my organization. The timestamp indexing and the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution's pricing increases with the amount of data used. This pricing model is acceptable because it aligns with the security features provided. It ensures that the price reflects the level of security and the amount of data we're managing."
"If you exceed your licensed limit, the product will issue a warning, typically a five-license warning. Additionally, they send daily email notifications informing you about the breach. This prompts you to consider options such as minimizing logs or acquiring additional licensing to address the issue."
"There are yearly payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the solution."
"I rate the product's pricing a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is a very pricey tool."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"The product is expensive, and the cost depends on the amount of data ingestion."
"Product pricing is typically annual, and discounts are often available for longer-term commitments."
"The tool is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Visualization solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Healthcare Company
13%
Government
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Splunk Enterprise Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are the load balancing technique, the forwarding technique, and SSL certification.
What needs improvement with Splunk Enterprise Platform?
Splunk Enterprise Platform could improve in the area of basic log readability. When performing basic searches without advanced filters, the logs often contain timestamps and various unknown codes o...
What is your primary use case for Splunk Enterprise Platform?
We use the solution to manage a large volume of data from our servers for the project I'm currently working on. Since we don't need all the data, we filter out and extract the specific information ...
 

Also Known As

Kato
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Jugnoo, Juggernaut, Sylvan, Complete Express, JSW Steel, eHealth, LimeBike
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization. Updated: September 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.