Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Virtual Server vs VMware ThinApp [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and VMware are both solutions in the Application Virtualization category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of VMware users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Virtual Server
Read 36 Microsoft Virtual Server reviews
  • 217 Views
  • 42 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
VMware ThinApp [EOL]
Read 3 VMware ThinApp [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and VMware ThinApp [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Application Virtualization Report (Updated: November 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Virtualization
    November 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 815,209 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Microsoft Virtual Server
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    36
    Ranking in other categories
    Application Virtualization (3rd)
    VMware ThinApp [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    3
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    ChimeremezeNwabueze - PeerSpot reviewer
    May 30, 2024
    Eliminates the need for physical hardware and is not platform dependent
    It's more like having your local PC or laptop on the cloud. You can spin up your virtual servers or virtual machines on the cloud, eliminating the need to purchase physical hardware. You still need a laptop to access the virtual server, but the virtual server on the cloud isn’t tied to a specific…
    Read full review
    it_user769638 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jun 1, 2018
    Streamlines checking our app after pushing an update, which helps cut costs
    In the past we used multiple servers to load-balance the application and when we pushed updates to the application we would need to check it on all servers. But when it comes to VMware ThinApp we can do it on a file server or Isilon share and this helps cut costs and create a healthy environment. If we publish an application in Citrix through a server we should have more capacity. On multiple occasions, some applications need updates so at that point we need to disable the servers. But in this case there is no need for disabling user sessions, they can use it and we can do just gpupdate to update all servers in a row.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Microsoft Virtual Server is an expensive solution."
    "The solution is very expensive."
    "The pricing must be improved."
    "Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
    "There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
    "Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
    "The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."
    "The product is expensive."
    More Microsoft Virtual Server pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    815,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    No data available
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Government
    9%
    Financial Services Firm
    9%
    Healthcare Company
    8%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Microsoft Virtual Server?
    The solution is easy to manage.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?
    Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
    One feature I would like to see is better compatibility with macOS. Due to business policies, macOS isn't currently available in the Azure Marketplace. Microsoft should come to agreement with it.
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    No data available
    Microsoft App-V vs VMware ThinApp [EOL] Logo
    Microsoft App-V vs VMware ThinApp [EOL]
    Compared 81% of the time
    Numecent vs VMware ThinApp [EOL] Logo
    Numecent vs VMware ThinApp [EOL]
    Compared 19% of the time
    More VMware ThinApp [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Virtual Server
    October 2024
    Microsoft Virtual Server reportDownload Microsoft Virtual Server product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Virtualization
    November 2024
    VMware ThinApp [EOL] reportDownload VMware ThinApp [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
    ThinApp
     

    Learn More

    Microsoft
    VMware
     

    Overview

    The most cost-effective server virtualization technology is now available as a free download. Virtual Server is a key component of any server consolidation strategy. Increase hardware utilization and cut power costs while enabling your organization to rapidly configure and deploy new servers.

    VMware ThinApp accelerates application deployment and simplifies application migration with agentless application virtualization. Deploy ThinApp packages on "locked-down" PCs and allow end users to run their favorite applications without compromising security. ThinApp eliminate application conflicts by isolating applications from each other and the underlying OS into a single executable file that can be easily deployed to many endpoints.

     

    Sample Customers

    Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
    Delhi International Airport, Telus Communications Company, Mansfield District Council, St Edmunds College, Sydney Adventist Hospital, ITSAM, Hertz International, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. , ASVZ, Appenzell Ausserrhoden Informatik, MTF, Stadt Hattingen, €sterreichisches Verkehrsbªro AG, DER Reisebªro GmbH & Co OHG, Thomas-Krenn.AG, BFI Wien, Metal One Pipe & Tubular Products Inc., NTT Neomeit
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Virtualization
    November 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: November 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    815,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.