Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NEOGOV vs PyjamaHR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

NEOGOV
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
26th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PyjamaHR
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
47th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1479855 - PeerSpot reviewer
Customizable and very centralized but quite expensive
I like the fact that you can adjust the views for who's using the system. I'm an administrator, so I have access to the entire solution, however, I can crop it down for my field staff to go in and do basic views on their own recruits, on their own recruitments, et cetera. It's customizable to the level of customer that's using it. That's probably the most valuable feature. I have all of our applicants in one place and then each department, depending on who's doing the recruiting for them, can go in on a department level. Everything's all in one place, however, so it's very central.
Use PyjamaHR?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

City of Baltimore, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, St. Louis County, Alabama State University, Eastern Michigan University, Carlsbad Unified School District, Seattle Public Schools, King County Superior Court, Superior Court of California, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, San Diego Unified Port District
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartRecruiters, Greenhouse, Zoho and others in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.