Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services vs Pentera comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Offensive Security Penetrat...
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pentera
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (14th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Penetration Testing Services category, the mindshare of Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is 2.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pentera is 30.5%, up from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Penetration Testing Services
 

Featured Reviews

Gabriel Woolverton - PeerSpot reviewer
Open source and easy to set up
Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great. If we had some data correlated with that, we could see why it is that this one should be successful versus another.
Richard Marlow - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization
The tool is quite scalable. There's a one-to-one relationship between the engine and how many scans we can do. We can only do one scan with one engine. We had some issues around the password assessments because we added a lot of users. It took a long time. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. We have three users in our organization.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services is open source, so it is free and there are no licensing costs."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The tool showed us that our ransomware protection wasn’t working on some machines."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The solution is SaaS-based. From a cloud perspective, it has Pentera Surface and Pentera Core. The Core is the on-prem deployed solution, while the Surface is the cloud-hosted solution that scans your public infrastructure. From the Surface perspective, the most valuable feature so far has been the attack surface mapping."
"The platform's most valuable features are credential management and vulnerability management."
"The product is easy to use."
 

Cons

"Offensive Security Penetration Testing Services has a rating system for how exploitable vulnerability is, but that rating system does not really give you any transparency into how the rating for that exploit was reached. It would be useful to see on the back end what data led them to specify that a specific exploit may not be very good or may be great."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"One of the big issues we have is that the tool has an additional license for compromised credentials. Suppose compromised credentials for any of your domains appear in leaks, dumps, or are being sold. In that case, they try to aggregate that data and highlight that, for example, ten users appeared in recent dumps as compromised credentials. However, they don't provide much information about where those compromises came from or their source information, probably to protect their sources."
"The automated penetration testing features must be improved."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring."
"The price could be improved."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product's cost is reasonable. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."
"We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."
"The tool is relatively cheap."
"It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Pentera?
What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
What needs improvement with Pentera?
One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring.
What is your primary use case for Pentera?
Our customers use the product to validate their security environment, ensuring that vulnerabilities within the network are identified and addressed.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Amazon, IBM, Oracle, U.S. Department of Defense, Deloitte, Salesforce
Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, HackerOne, Veracode and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: November 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.