Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Portnox CORE vs Tempered Airwall comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Portnox CORE
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tempered Airwall
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Portnox CORE is 2.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tempered Airwall is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

KN
Dec 28, 2023
Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices
We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more robust. So we have noticed there's a bit of sluggish. CORE is a bit sluggish when authenticating devices on the network. So, sometimes you find you have an authentication policy, but it takes time for some devices to get authenticated. So we really don't know why. But, that's why we're really looking to move to Portnox Clear. There, the vendor is managing the infrastructure. And not us or a the client managing the infrastructure.
Use Tempered Airwall?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."
"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."
"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."
"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."
"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."
"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."
"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."
"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
5%
University
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?
It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?
It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?
We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
R&D Lab
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.