Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Portworx Enterprise vs StorageOS [EOL] comparison

Pure Storage and Akamai are both solutions in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category. Additionally, 100% of Pure Storage users are willing to recommend the solution.
Portworx Enterprise
Read 6 Portworx Enterprise reviews
  • 1,556 Views
  • 1,062 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Portworx Enterprise and StorageOS [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, Rancher Labs and others in Data Storage for Kubernetes.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
 

Categories and Ranking

Portworx Enterprise
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd), Data Storage for Kubernetes (1st)
StorageOS [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Paulo Jose Bosco Otto - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2023
A solution backed by strong customer support, that is stable and scalable
As a company managed in a Kubernetes environment, being trusted by a Kubernetes vendor, Red Hat creates barriers against using other certified solutions that work. Because IBM is a competitor of Pure Storage, things seem to be getting worse. I don't have plans to use Portworx Enterprise in the future because, at the moment, I am working with Ondat, and I have to follow NetApp's direction on that. When evaluating Portworx, one should make sure their company has already chosen Pure Storage. Still, if they are evaluating the solution on Ondat or Dell or other platforms, they should get a roadmap statement from Pure Storage, that they will continue to develop storage hardware diagnostics. I rate Portworx a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Use StorageOS [EOL]?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000."
"The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM."
"The price of Portworx Enterprise is high."
"It has two offerings. One is free, which is limited to only five nodes. The other is enterprise, which is a bit pricier."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Storage for Kubernetes solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portworx Enterprise?
A custom IBM script is designed to tackle the storage management challenges within containerized environments, providing crucial data services and features required for enterprise applications.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portworx Enterprise?
The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Portworx Enterprise?
It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately. It would ensure a comprehensive and streamlined approach ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation vs Portworx Enterprise Logo
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation vs Portworx Enterprise
Compared 37% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Portworx Enterprise Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Portworx Enterprise
Compared 22% of the time
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Portworx Enterprise Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Portworx Enterprise
Compared 12% of the time
IBM Spectrum Scale vs Portworx Enterprise Logo
IBM Spectrum Scale vs Portworx Enterprise
Compared 7% of the time
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Portworx Enterprise Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Portworx Enterprise
Compared 5% of the time
More Portworx Enterprise Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Software Defined Storage
October 2024
Portworx Enterprise reportDownload Portworx Enterprise product report
No data available
 

Learn More

Pure Storage
Akamai
 

Overview

Portworx is the solution for running stateful containers in production, designed with DevOps in mind. With Portworx, users can manage any database or stateful service on any infrastructure using any container scheduler, including Kubernetes, Mesosphere DC/OS, and Docker Swarm. Portworx solves the five most common problems DevOps teams encounter when running stateful services in production: persistence, high availability, data automation, security, and support for multiple data stores and infrastructure.

You store your data where you want – in the cloud, on-premises or hybrid. We’ll abstract your data, provide a storage pool and the scalability, resiliency, performance and availability your stateful application requires.

You gain persistent storage deployed with the same declarative syntax you use for Kubernetes. A low container footprint, you can use StorageOS to support your cloud native workflows.

 

Sample Customers

NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT
Information Not Available
See our list of best Data Storage for Kubernetes vendors.

We monitor all Data Storage for Kubernetes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.