HPE StoreVirtual Reviews

StoreVirtual's High Availability and redundancy are the most valuable features for us.

It has removed the single point of failure. The resiliency was improved due to features like snapshotting at hardware level. It gives us better uptime and improved HA time, which means less downtime in the event of a failure.

Communication of HP firmware and BIOS updates need work. Also, the directives relating to the products need to be improved.

We've used it for one and a half years.

We had no issues with the deployment.

There was an issue with one CPU overheating and causing fans to rev up. The CPU had to be reseated and firmware updates applied.

We've had no issues scaling it for our needs.

Technical support is good, but it could be better.

There was no solution in place previously.

It was straightforward by using the HP CMC software.

The pricing and licensing are fair.

There were no other solutions looked at.

This is a good SAN solution.

It works great in a stretched datacenter. All data stored across two data centers is available.

If one datacenter fails, we can continue without failure.

It needs to have an SSD solution.

We used LeftHand for more than seven years before it became an HP solution.

We had no issues with the deployment.

We've had no stability issues.

It's better not to have big clusters or volumes, so we've avoided scaling it.

6.5/10 - We have a lot of experience and often they already know where the problem is.

We used LeftHand for block-based storage and other storage solutions for file storage.

The initial setup is very simple. Just think about your design with the management groups and clusters.

The ROI is fine.

The price per GB/TB is good.