


HPE StoreVirtual and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct compete in the network storage domain, with HPE StoreVirtual having the edge in integrated platform capabilities and broad hypervisor support.
Features: HPE StoreVirtual offers high availability with its Network RAID feature, broad hypervisor support, and a single-point contact for issue resolution. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is notable for its performance via RDMA, feature integration within the Windows Server environment, and scalability for Microsoft ecosystem users.
Room for Improvement: HPE StoreVirtual needs better partner implementation strategies, a simplified licensing process, and improvements in latency and configuration. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct requires more comprehensive documentation, better API support, and improvements in network capabilities and management interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE StoreVirtual is acclaimed for easy on-premises deployment and has a reliable customer service team. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is valued for its integration within Windows systems and benefits from a broad support network.
Pricing and ROI: HPE StoreVirtual offers competitive licensing but can become costly without careful management, yet it typically provides excellent ROI. Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, part of the Windows Server suite, offers cost efficiencies for Microsoft users with positive ROI, although initial costs can be high.
It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.
While our systems will be out of life in a few years, I believe that in that time, the payback from Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct will save us money on virtualization and storage costs, making it extremely beneficial after six years of use.
I see some ROI in Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, such as saving time and money, and I estimate these savings to be about 30%.
Their technical support has been perfect lately, so I would give it a 10.
I would rate them an eight out of ten.
The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
There were issues that the Microsoft team could not pinpoint, leading to delays in finding solutions.
Microsoft focuses on Azure as a cloud service.
There are between 5 and 10,000 people using it in our organization.
Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.
The scalability of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct has been extremely good, allowing for both vertical and horizontal expansion.
The scalability of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is limited.
It has limitations; it's configured for eight servers per site but can be scaled to 16 servers.
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct has been incredibly stable as long as it is configured correctly; incorrect configurations lead to surprises, which is common with any product.
Storage Spaces Direct is stable enough, however, there can be some glitches.
Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.
One way Pure Storage FlashBlade can be improved is by having more compatibility between the FlashArray and FlashBlade.
Its configuration should be easier.
One year ago, I had a problem, and it was difficult to identify and solve due to a lack of tools.
The licensing for Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct could be improved to be clearer, as calculating license requirements requires significant expertise; even Microsoft resources do not provide the full picture needed for licensing, leaving gaps that become evident once we move to deploy solutions.
The performance of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is challenging when trying to support both NVMe and SATA SSDs, and there are problems regarding performance that need to be addressed.
Regarding pricing, it is okay; we needed exactly this in size, and the price was a lot lower than competitors, making it good for us.
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.
I find the Azure Local to be a bit expensive, especially due to hidden costs associated with additional tools needed for monitoring and alerting.
Pricing is an advantage of Storage Spaces Direct.
Pure Storage FlashBlade's scalability is one of the most valuable features, and importantly, it always works, allowing for seamless upgrades.
The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
For caching, I use disks with more total bits written, which protects the main storage because writes are combined.
The redundancy and fault tolerance features of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct have helped maintain data integrity and availability in my company by providing multiple copies through three-way mirroring, delivering hardware performance needed for our applications, which is crucial.
One of the best things about Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is that it allows for optimized storage solutions and high availability, which is beneficial for managing workloads efficiently.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Pure Storage FlashBlade | 3.3% |
| Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct | 6.1% |
| HPE StoreVirtual | 2.2% |
| Other | 88.4% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.
HPE StoreVirtual storage ensures that organisations can optimise the benefits of server virtualisation with cost-effective high availability and disaster recovery. The iSCSI-based, scale-out storage platform is easy to manage and change – meeting ongoing business demands without creating IT bottlenecks or application downtime. Overcoming the cost and management limitations of traditional storage area networks (SANs), HPE StoreVirtual nodes use storage clustering to form a single pool of resources that enable organisations to buy only what they need today, scaling non-disruptively to meet requirements in the future.
Storage Spaces Direct uses industry-standard servers with local-attached drives to create highly available, highly scalable software-defined storage at a fraction of the cost of traditional SAN or NAS arrays. Its converged or hyper-converged architecture radically simplifies procurement and deployment, while features like caching, storage tiers, and erasure coding, together with the latest hardware innovation like RDMA networking and NVMe drives, deliver unrivaled efficiency and performance.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.