HPE Wireless WAN Reviews

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity.

We are working in an integrated company in Turkey and lots of projects that we are working on are using this product.

The initial setup is simple if you do a proper rollout and explain everything to the client.

The product is quite stable.

We've found the scalability to be good.

The technical support team has been quite helpful and responsive.

Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing.

It would be ideal if they developed more industrial synergies on the market.

I've used the solution for a number of years. It's easily been over ten. I've used it for quite a while. 

The stability of the solution is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The product can scale. If you are a company that needs to expand, you can do so.

We have a big technical team in our company. Lots of our engineers have Aruba certification, for example. They are well trained. However, when and if we need to reach out directly to Aruba about HPE Wireless, their team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable. They have been great and we are satisfied with their level of service. 

I am using both Huawei Wireless and HP Wireless WAN. We also use Cisco.

The initial setup can be complex, however, if you organize everything beforehand, it can be quite straightforward. 

Its pricing is not the best price on the market as Huawei and Ubiquiti are cheaper. The Aruba technology is comparable to Cisco. When we compare the prices to Cisco, they have better pricing on projects. Huawei prices are cheaper than the Cisco and Aruba however, if the Aruba sales team supports us, they can get us the best price for the project.

We're a partner. We help clients install this product into their environments.

Mostly, we use the private cloud in Turkey, however, often hybrid deployments are also used. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. For the most part, we are quite satisfied with the capabilities and the level of service we are provided. 

We are using HPE Wireless for endpoint connections in our office. All of the notebook and mobile users work with it, so in total, it's around 50 users or fewer.

HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches. 

The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly.

I've been using HPE Wireless for several years. 

HPE Wireless is very stable. 

Technical support is great. When we initiate a ticket, they respond quickly with help troubleshooting, and they're very friendly.

Installing HPE Wireless is straightforward, but we still run into difficulties sometimes. The last time we installed it, it took about two hours. The vendor helped us. 

In terms of pricing, HPE Wireless is quite reasonable.

I rate HPE Wireless 10 out of 10. I would recommend it. 

We use it to obtain seamless roaming. So many people want to roam from one room to another room, and at that time, they don't want their video call to disconnect. HPE Wireless WAN helps with this.

HPE Wireless WAN provides security so that your networks can't be hacked. Also, the lifetime warranty protects your financial investment.

The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time.

So, you won't experience network failure beyond a day because of advanced replacement. Your product won't fail, and your financial investment won't fail either.

It is also stable, scalable, and user friendly.

HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing.

I've been using HPE Wireless WAN for the past six years.

There are no issues with the stability of the product.

It is very scalable. There are no issues with it. It can be scaled each year, for instance.

HP technical support is better than that of anyone else. They have two types of support packages: partner care and foundation care. With partner care, the partner will support the L1 and L2 levels, and HP will support the L3 level.

If you buy the foundation care package, HP can support at the L1 level itself. They can remotely do the installation as well.

Installation is usually easy. I am currently working on training our partners to do the installation themselves.

Depending on the type of deployment, you may need one person to a hundred people. Usually, the first deployment can be handled by one person.

I would rate this solution at ten on a scale from one to ten. I would say that quality wise, it is on the higher end of the scale, whereas price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale.

If you use a cloud solution and then after two or three years decide that you do not want a cloud solution, it may not be possible to switch to on-premises with solutions like Cisco Meraki. However, it is possible with HPE Wireless WAN.

We are using HPE Wireless WAN in hospitals and governments to serve the network connection to devices, such as phones.

The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability.

The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for approximately eight years.

HPE Wireless WAN is highly stable.

We have approximately 200 devices connected to the solution.

The solution is very effective and because of this, I have never had to open up a ticket to support.

The setup of HPE Wireless WAN is not complex. It took us approximately one month to deploy the solution with 200 devices.

The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN a nine out of ten.

We primarily use it with government organizations or in healthcare. 

The simplicity of the configuration process is very useful to us.

The visibility of the management is great.

The features are excellent.

We find the security to be very good.

Setting up the solution initially is very easy.

Stability has been great so far.

Users can scale the solution if they need to.

Technical support is helpful.

I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved.

Overall, I'm good with what is on offer right now.

I've been using the solution for about five or six years at this point. It's been a while now. 

Stability in general is quite good. I can't recall coming across bugs or glitches. It doesn't seem to crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

The solution scales very well.

We have about 4,000 users on the product at this time.

We do have plans to increase usage in the future. 

Technical support has been very good. We are quite satisfied with the level of service we get. 

We just use HP and Aruba at this time. 

I have found the initial implementation to be very simple and quite straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issues handling the process. 

The deployment itself took two or three days. To deploy the solution, we needed about ten people. 

We used a reseller and they assisted with the initial implementation. We did not do it ourselves.

We pay a yearly licensing fee. It's just a standard fee with no additional costs. 

We're a partner. 

I'd advise new users to just try the new models. Don't be afraid of implementing the new features and try to integrate with clear paths and other security solutions from Aruba to obtain a better outcome.

I would rate the solution at a ten out of ten overall.

We are using HPE Wireless WAN for network security.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for approximately 10 years.

The solution is scalable.

The scalability is good, but it could improve.

We have approximately 200 locations using this solution.

The support has been responsive and helpful.

The installation is straightforward and can take approximately four hours.

I did the implementation of the solution myself.

We have a two-person team for the maintenance of the solution.

We have been satisfied with the price.

I would recommend this solution to others, HPE Aruba is one of the best in the world. We are using an older version and I would advise others to implement the newest one.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN an eight out of ten.

We use the HPE Wireless WAN as part of our overall networking solution.

The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility.

I have been using this solution for approximately five years.

I have never had an issue with stability.

The solution is scalable.

At the height of our daily usage, there are approximately 500 users.

I have previously used Aruba and Cisco solutions.

The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it.

I used an internal team of two that does the implementation of the solutions.

The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN an eight out of ten.

This solution is used for network access with updated features.

The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable. They are able to provide many different types of EPS in different situations, such as indoor and outdoor. Additionally, they provide a higher level of services compared to other solutions.

In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms.

I have been using this solution for approximately two years.

I find the solution stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have more than 100 customers using it.

The support of the solution is great and we are very satisfied with it.

The installation of the solution was very simple and took only a couple of minutes. 

We have approximately 15 administrators for the deployments and maintenance.

There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN a ten out of ten.