Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 37.8%, up from 37.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Sivakumar V - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users
I use the solution for the library environment in our institution. There are three devices we use in our institution for the same purposes Multiple people use the tool and connect to it seamlessly. Seamless connectivity could be achieved with the tool. Aruba has taken over HPE, after which we…
Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement
In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz. Another point is that its penetration power is low when we are using it in any location with more walls, as the signal strength diminishes. So, the signal strength and the penetration power of the signal should be improved. It is not like Cisco. We are using Cisco APs also, but Cisco APs perform better when we compare them with Ruckus. In future releases, I would like to see automatic switching between 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz frequencies. We should not have to set it manually. It should automatically change its frequency based on the load. For example, if the number of users increases, then its frequency should change automatically, switching to the less congested band.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to use."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The reliability is good."
"The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service."
"Its benefits include efficient zone deployment and access point distribution, simplifying network management."
"The tool is friendly to use."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"We use things like VLAN and all the multibeam features that are built in, but at the end of the day, the most important thing for us is to get a good signal and site-wide coverage."
"The performance is very nice, the throughput is better than any other product, and it's reliable."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
 

Cons

"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"It should be a faster device."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
"The product needs to improve its latency and performance."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"The initial setup is complex."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"I would like to see the billing system improved by adding a billing system integration."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"The interface has to be more automated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"The price is perfect for me."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"The product is available at a very good price, but it is not cheap compared to tools like Unifi. I believe it is a very good product for the price that it is offered to users."
"It is less expensive than Aruba and Cisco."
"The solution is a little pricey, so customers sometimes select other products because of the price."
"We have to pay annually for the cloud licenses, so I think it'll be about 5,000 pounds a year moving forwards."
"This solution offers a yearly subscription. The price is not high, other solutions are much higher than Ruckus."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
"There is an annual license needed to use this solution. The pricing model is based on how many access points are used."
"The solution is very competitively priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Wireless WAN?
If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model. If you need a feature-rich product, then they only have a feature model.
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
HP has wired the product range. The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers. They have to introduce new technologies and their road map, and only then can a customer collabora...
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
I would rate the pricing as a seven out of ten. It is on par with other enterprise solutions like Aruba or Arista. The pricing can be an obstacle for some businesses.
 

Also Known As

Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bell Canada
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.