Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.0
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers excellent ROI with quick payback, enhanced by automation reducing workload and boosting efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.1
Users achieved significant ROI with Ruckus Wireless WAN over several years, noting cost savings and extended replacement cycles.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers reliable customer service, though users suggest improvements in efficiency and initiating support.
Sentiment score
6.6
Ruckus Wireless WAN support is responsive and efficient, though initial contact expertise and escalation process need improvement.
Their technical support is excellent.
When we seek support, the service we expect is not promptly delivered, which can be time-consuming.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers impressive scalability, accommodating diverse sectors with potential for expansion and favorable user experience.
Sentiment score
7.8
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers scalable, flexible solutions for diverse deployment sizes, with manageable costs and extensive industry applications.
I find the scalability quite good, with a rating of eight out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is praised for stability and uptime, though some minor issues exist with the 2.4 GHz network.
Sentiment score
8.3
Ruckus Wireless WAN is praised for stability and reliability, despite occasional hardware issues needing cautious complex environment deployment.
 

Room For Improvement

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN struggles with high pricing, poor signal, complex setup, insufficient support, and requires better integration and stability.
Ruckus Wireless WAN requires pricing, documentation, support improvements, expanded features, better usability, and adaptation to market demands.
Although the development of high throughput radios is ongoing, due to government of India licensing issues, the deployment is affected.
There seems to be no visible improvement in the Gartner positioning, which is crucial even as companies like Huawei are also entering the wireless sector.
 

Setup Cost

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is mid-range, often pricey in some regions, with costs involving hardware but no licensing fees.
Ruckus Wireless WAN pricing varies, seen as valuable yet expensive compared to alternatives, with cost differences by region and packages.
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
 

Valuable Features

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers easy setup, robust performance, cost-effectiveness, cloud management, and scalability, making it highly preferred.
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers high performance, easy management, excellent coverage, and unique features, competing effectively with Cisco and Aruba.
The solution offers excellent product performance, long-distance coverage, and link reliability.
The most valuable features are the advanced technologies like BeamFlex, which make a significant difference.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 13.2%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 37.7%, up from 37.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Arup Kumar Koley - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable performance and long-distance coverage enhance connectivity
We have been associated with Cambium since its days as a Motorola product, for more than 20 years. The solution offers excellent product performance, long-distance coverage, and link reliability. No nearby product is available for distance and performance that can compete with Cambium. The uptime and reliability of the product are also excellent.
Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement
In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz. Another point is that its penetration power is low when we are using it in any location with more walls, as the signal strength diminishes. So, the signal strength and the penetration power of the signal should be improved. It is not like Cisco. We are using Cisco APs also, but Cisco APs perform better when we compare them with Ruckus. In future releases, I would like to see automatic switching between 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz frequencies. We should not have to set it manually. It should automatically change its frequency based on the load. For example, if the number of users increases, then its frequency should change automatically, switching to the less congested band.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What do you like most about Cambium?
The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller.
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
The pricing is reasonable for us as partners since we receive discounts. However, I believe for non-partners, it might not be considered cheap, though it isn't the most expensive either.
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.