We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"The performance is very nice, the throughput is better than any other product, and it's reliable."
"We use things like VLAN and all the multibeam features that are built in, but at the end of the day, the most important thing for us is to get a good signal and site-wide coverage."
"The strongest point for Ruckus has always been the radio hardware."
"Tech support is good."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"One of the standout features is the ease of installation and commissioning, making the whole process very straightforward."
"If they could move from the fixed wireless point to mobile, it will make a big change in the market. The cnPilot coverage should be covering big spaces. It should also have an external antenna, not a built-in antenna."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"The solution's price could be better."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"We had a problem with the delivery of the solution."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"The stability of the solution could improve in an upcoming release."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"The solution's AI offering and pricing could be improved."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.