Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 14.5%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 37.8%, up from 37.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Said Souhaiel - PeerSpot reviewer
Has been helpful in overcoming coverage challenges
Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points.
Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement
In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz. Another point is that its penetration power is low when we are using it in any location with more walls, as the signal strength diminishes. So, the signal strength and the penetration power of the signal should be improved. It is not like Cisco. We are using Cisco APs also, but Cisco APs perform better when we compare them with Ruckus. In future releases, I would like to see automatic switching between 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz frequencies. We should not have to set it manually. It should automatically change its frequency based on the load. For example, if the number of users increases, then its frequency should change automatically, switching to the less congested band.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the network strength, which allows for coverage over a larger distance."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is simple to use. Its coverage is better than other tools."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"The ratio of highest quality to value is the most valuable."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"The performance of this solution is amazing in terms of radiofrequency technology."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."
"The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service."
 

Cons

"I think this product could be improved if It were SMS based. If I have a visitor in my office, I'd like to be able to send them the wireless password as a message via SMS, so I don't have to give it out."
"The solution's documentation should be made better and easily accessible to users."
"The installation is difficult."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"I have been working with WiFi for more than 17 years. I am not able to convince customers because of the pricing of the solution. Otherwise, we could have sold lots of this tool to the customers."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The wireless access should be simplified."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"The product needs to improve its latency and performance."
"I would like to have a better built-in reporting feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing part of the solution is not very expensive."
"Its price is in the middle range."
"There are not any licenses needed to use Cambium."
"I rate Cambium Networks Wireless as 6 out of 10 since it is cheaper than its competitors like Ruckus, Cisco or Huawei."
"There are no licensing fees, it's a one-time cost."
"It is expensive."
"I think the pricing is fine for Cambium."
"Pricing is fair enough."
"There is an annual license needed to use this solution. The pricing model is based on how many access points are used."
"It's expensive but you get more coverage."
"The price of Ruckus Wireless WAN is in the middle price range compared to competitors. You will find Cisco is the most expensive, the second is HPE and Aruba, and the third is Ruckus Wireless WAN. You then have all the follower solutions."
"The solution is very competitively priced."
"Here in India, Ruckus is chosen often because it is priced low."
"We have to pay annually for the cloud licenses, so I think it'll be about 5,000 pounds a year moving forwards."
"The cost of licensing varies."
"It possesses a favorable balance between quality and price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What do you like most about Cambium?
The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium?
The solution's licensing cost depends on the number of nodes.
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
I would rate the pricing as a seven out of ten. It is on par with other enterprise solutions like Aruba or Arista. The pricing can be an obstacle for some businesses.
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.