Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.0
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers excellent ROI with quick payback, enhanced by automation reducing workload and boosting efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.9
Cisco Wireless WAN is valued for reliability, centralized control, and significant ROI despite higher licensing costs, enhancing productivity.
Cisco's licensing structure is more expensive than FortiNet, as it requires different tiers of licenses to access advanced features.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers reliable customer service, though users suggest improvements in efficiency and initiating support.
Sentiment score
6.8
Cisco Wireless WAN's customer service is praised despite some delays, with high satisfaction in RMA services and comprehensive support.
Their technical support is excellent.
If an engineer's shift ends, I have to re-explain everything to a new engineer, which is challenging.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers impressive scalability, accommodating diverse sectors with potential for expansion and favorable user experience.
Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco Wireless WAN is highly scalable, easily integrates, and supports diverse networks, though licensing and hardware constraints may impact decisions.
There isn't a limit to scalability, but for deployments exceeding five thousand equipment, it requires opening a case with Meraki support to increase capacity.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is praised for stability and uptime, though some minor issues exist with the 2.4 GHz network.
Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco Wireless WAN is praised for its strong stability, reliability, minimal issues, and quick support, receiving high user ratings.
 

Room For Improvement

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN struggles with high pricing, poor signal, complex setup, insufficient support, and requires better integration and stability.
Cisco Wireless WAN requires enhancements in compatibility, pricing, setup ease, integration, management, automation, UI, troubleshooting, and support.
Although the development of high throughput radios is ongoing, due to government of India licensing issues, the deployment is affected.
Walmart is interested in using electronic tags instead of paper labels for easier price changes on products.
 

Setup Cost

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is mid-range, often pricey in some regions, with costs involving hardware but no licensing fees.
Enterprises find Cisco Wireless WAN pricing high due to mandatory licenses and seek alternatives despite strong features.
The cost is one of the higher in the industry.
 

Valuable Features

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers easy setup, robust performance, cost-effectiveness, cloud management, and scalability, making it highly preferred.
Cisco Wireless WAN offers high-speed, secure performance with easy management, advanced QoS, WiFi 6 support, and seamless Cisco integration.
The solution offers excellent product performance, long-distance coverage, and link reliability.
The main value of using Cisco Wireless WAN with Meraki is that the technology is cloud-based, making it more accessible for the customer to troubleshoot and implement changes remotely.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 12.6%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Wireless WAN is 2.8%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Arup Kumar Koley - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable performance and long-distance coverage enhance connectivity
We have been associated with Cambium since its days as a Motorola product, for more than 20 years. The solution offers excellent product performance, long-distance coverage, and link reliability. No nearby product is available for distance and performance that can compete with Cambium. The uptime and reliability of the product are also excellent.
LalanChowdhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances network reliability, offers device longevity and offers open authentication
The device longevity is a factor. enhances network reliability. Specifically, the handoff feature for WAN, when a customer moves from one access point to another in a building or office, is much easier and more reliable if it's controller-based. So, in those cases, we recommend the traditional controller-based solution. Cisco is adding AI features; they've already started in SD-WAN. But in Bangladesh, people are still new to AI. Cisco is including AI capabilities in their devices, so people are gradually adopting them. If they need AI-driven devices for industrial purposes, they can use them. So, Cisco is forward-thinking with these features. Even though they're not being used extensively now, they may be used in the future for things like RFID or automation. That's why Cisco's solution is logical and adaptable.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What do you like most about Cambium?
The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller.
What do you like most about Cisco Wireless WAN?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Wireless WAN?
The price point is the main challenge as it seems complicated and unclear. We pay a premium for features we do not use.
What needs improvement with Cisco Wireless WAN?
The graphical user interface is okay, however, the CLI type is not very user-friendly. The GUI is okay, yet it needs more strength in the CLI mode as well. Sometimes, issues are not fully addressed...
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.