We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management. It has features like other solutions, but it's easier to manage. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN also has a tax asset benefit which is good."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"From the performance perspective, I'm happy with the solution. Also, from the technical side, it seems to be pretty good."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is that it is easy to configure. Additionally, with the same configuration with Cisco and Ruckus, we can receive 55 to 60 percent more out of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"Aruba Central seems to be a good way to go in cloud management. However, compared to Cisco Meraki, it's still very early days."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The installation process was easy."
"We don't know this product very well yet, but what we have used so far and what we like are user control, bandwidth, and access."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"Technical support has been good."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is expensive."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"It is a little bit cumbersome to configure. If you're designing a WLAN and you want to do and cover certain types of clients, you really have to know different settings and how they interact with one another. If they could automate that so that if you are designing for one type of equipment, you could, in essence, run a wizard. That would certainly save on a lot of calls to tech support."
"The solution would be improved with a better interface."
"The only issues are the configuration problems that impact the stability of the solution."
"We'd like to have a bit more artificial intelligence incorporated into existing products."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN could improve the solution availability. The selection of mounting hardware for the various radios is limited and poor. Often, you have to create and manufacture your own mounting hardware in certain situations."
"The product should improve Aruba Central."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"The solution's price could be better."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.