Microsoft Entra ID Protection Reviews

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID Protection primarily for identity and privileged access management. It provides multifactor authentication and accessor capabilities, managing specific conditional access for applications.

The tool offers multifactor authentication, which provides an additional layer of security for authentication.

The valuable features include multifactor authentication, accessory capabilities, and conditional access for specific applications.

There are new features added, such as passwordless protection and passwordless login, which eliminates the need to enter a password.

I have been working with this solution for three years.

The recent CrowdStrike issue affected most systems. That said, 98% of the time, there are no major outages.

Scaling up or down is not a problem since we can choose the respective region and host it there, even get our own private cloud if required.

Microsoft support depends on the subscription. With a good subscription, they respond within three hours.

Positive

When considering costs, having an enterprise subscription with Microsoft Azure can be more economical than other specific SSO identity providers, as it comes with additional MFA and SSO features.

I evaluated other solutions like Okta and CyberArk before choosing Microsoft Entra ID Protection. CyberArk stands out with different features yet at a higher cost.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The solution helps us with authentication. 

I am impressed with the tool's compliance and authentication. 

The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution to manage users, groups, access, and license. 

The tool is simple and you can find a lot of tutorials, and videos on YouTube that can help you. 

The solution's sync should be faster since it can take about 30 minutes to two hours to complete a simple sync. The tool needs to sync instantly. It also needs to improve scalability, support, and stability. 

I have been using the product for four years. 

I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. We encountered bugs while integrating with other Microsoft or MDM solutions. 

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 200 users.

Support takes longer than expected to revert back. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.