Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Systems Analyst/Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Good availability and great for running exchanges and managed services
Pros and Cons
  • "The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere."
  • "Support could always be a bit better."

What is our primary use case?

The typical use base varies due to the fact that, with our client base, we're here, there, and everywhere across the board. It all depends on what direction they want us to go and that we go, or suggest to go. The only places that we would use a virtual server is in an instance of running an exchange. I have also looked at it for running our managed services server on as well.

What is most valuable?

The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere.

The solution works well for running exchanges and managed services.

What needs improvement?

It's evolving so fast here now I don't know whether a guy can stay ahead of what the next thing should be. It's extremely difficult to keep up right now.

Support could always be a bit better. It's integral to a product. If it's not good, you end up shying away from the product itself. You want to feel assured that the company can help you if you run into trouble. Microsoft is beginning to lose popularity as it's becoming extremely hard to get a hold of anyone. It's a problem.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for around five years or so. It's been a while at this point.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Virtual Server
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Virtual Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Most of our clients are small. I'd say 30 users and below. We do have some that are a little bit larger than that, however, predominantly under 50 is where it's at.

I'm not very familiar with the scalability aspect of the solution. It's not something I've dealt with head-on.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support used to be better. These days, Microsoft support is getting harder and harder to reach. It's turning people off. We're less satisfied with it at the moment. Even if you have the proper licensing for the support it doesn't seem to make it easier to connect with them. Microsoft has lost all credibility on this front.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup can be a bit difficult, and often it's a time when you need to reach out to support.

It's like anything else that's hung out there on the internet. There's a lot of factors that come into play, and sometimes it's not the actual server that's causing the grief. It's the connection through it and all the rest of it.

We have about six people on staff that can assist with any maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In terms of licensing costs, it varies depending upon how much you need. It all falls together. What is advertised to get started really, in nine times out of 10, doesn't give you enough to run under for any length of time.

What other advice do I have?

We're resellers.

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using at this time. It's likely one of the latest versions.

In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. Largely, it's a pretty good solution, however, technical support is really lacking right now.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
it_user82776 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Executive Officer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Top 20
Net4 reaching beyond

A virtual Private Server is created by partitioning a physical server into multiple virtual servers in a way that each server is capable of running on its own as a dedicated server. Each virtual server can run its own full-fledged operating system, and each server can be independently rebooted. In terms of security VPS accounts are insulated from each other, greatly minimizing the risk of unauthorized access from hackers. Cloud Server provide the highest level of security just like a dedicated server, complete with customizable firewall protection and secure isolated disk space along with the benefit of sharing the cost of the server with other users yet reaping the benefits of the dedicated server. In the performance of the VPS 's all the resources can be regulated in the cloud server environment.One customer cannot run away with a large share of the resources.Your service will run reliably and predictably. For the Control aspects of Net4 VPS are designed for the customer looking for more control than a web hosting account but yet not ready for a dedicated server. These private servers include root access guaranteed resources,and technical support.Unlike a shared server, cloud server allows you the control of the server.You can choose the software you want to install,RAM,processor etc.The low cost factor of VPS hosting model provided by Net4 suits Small and medium companies that are looking for performance better than that offered by shared hosting,yet without the higher costs of collocation. A cloud server provides the features of a dedicated server on a machine that is a shared hardware environment. You get full server environment without sacrificing privacy or performance that too on a much lower cost as compared to having a dedicated server.

Features: 1.dedicated cloud server and complete system isolation 2. dedicated IP Addresses(es)- additional IP (additional cost -optional)

3.choice of OS ,windows,linux Cent OS

4.Connect directly using SSH,remote desktop or terminal services

5.Full root/Administrator Access over the entire Operating system

6.Instal Custom Software

7.Free 24/7/365 online support

8.VM backup and restore

9.On demand memory and space up gradation

10. 99.9 percent uptime

11.Protected by enterprise firewall/intrusion Prevention appliances and VLAN

12.Control panel support for eg. CPanel, Plesk (optional with cost)

13. MSSQL std/Ent/workgroup/web/MYSQL Enterprise database (optional with additional cost)

These are some of the features I see Net4 delivering, it may be accustomed to certain changes if problems arise in the deployment segment but it is very well structured in a way to counter any problems being encountered. NET4 is an Indian company with a net worth of 85million US dollars yearly dealing with providing suitable cloud and IT services in South East Asia.

Security is a burden here but you may check out the virtualising softwares such as Citrix and MS-hypervisor-V and install it to run alongside NET4's hypervisors,just to beef up security.

Trevor Gankarch

Cloud Engineer, Papua New Guinea

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Virtual Server
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Virtual Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user3870 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager of Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Start to virtualise your infrastructure

Valuable Features:

The ability to add more resources to a virtual server, in a few mouse clicks is amazing!Virtual servers are very handy to use when testing applications/software before deploying them into a live environment. If something goes wrong, the server is easily replaceable with little effort i.e. using snapshots to revert back to a previous point in time.A virtual server is just a large file that is stored on a physical disk. Which means, once you have built a virtual server, it can be copied/moved anywhere. Making backup very easy to achieve.

Room for Improvement:

There are no doubts virtual servers can be very useful but there are also several important disadvantages that you should be aware of, With a physical server things are less complicated, you do not have to have expert knowledge in server virtualisation. Some versions of Windows operating systems do no run well on a virtual platform, such as XP and WIndows 2003 - even with integration tools installed. One major problem is - If you have forgotten a password for the only user account on a virtual server, you wont be able to plug in a password reset disk - it will have to rebuilt. (Or restored from a backup if you have one!)

Other Advice:

Anyone that has not looked into virtualisation needs to. The benefits are endless, we have been running virtual machines since 2007 and since then our infrastructure has become more efficient and reliable.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1453014 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Designer/IT coordinator at a energy/utilities company with 11-50 employees
Real User
We don't have a large infrastructure. Just a single VM server with network switches and a firewall.
Pros and Cons
  • "Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
  • "In terms of what could be improved, pricing is always too high of course."

What is our primary use case?

We are an engineering firm, so we're using Microsoft Virtual Server for engineering, drafting, and administration.

How has it helped my organization?

We're a pretty small business, so we don't have a large infrastructure. Just a single VM server with network switches and a firewall. That's our infrastructure.

What is most valuable?

Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes.

What needs improvement?

 In terms of what could be improved, pricing is always too high of course.

For how long have I used the solution?

We just implemented a new server a year and a half ago. But prior to that, we were using the same software for about six-seven years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We are about 35 users using Microsoft Virtual Server at our company. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We've been running the FortiGate firewall for about a year and a bit now. For the most part, I work with a company not local to us, but they are the ones that look after the backend of our network. They're the ones that look after that firewall, but I've worked with it a little bit. We've got a local ADE firewall.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We just bought the perpetual licensing for the Microsoft Virtual Server.

What other advice do I have?

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Microsoft Virtual Server an 8.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user