Microsoft Virtual Server Reviews

I just use the solution for installation and configuration.

The solution's performance is good.

It would be good if the tool's integration improved.

I use Microsoft Virtual Server from time to time.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is easy. If you deploy the solution on the cloud, there is not much work to do. If you deploy it on-premises, you have to maintain it 24/7. The solution takes about ten minutes to deploy, but the time taken depends.

I set up the solution myself, though we sometimes need one to ten people to deploy and maintain the solution, depending on the environment.

The solution is deployed on the cloud but can also be on-premise. I rate Microsoft Virtual Server a ten out of ten and recommend the solution to others.

Our use cases are normal. It's a virtual machine. We have virtual machines for our application servers, for many application servers. So we use it just to reduce the cost of having new physical machines. That is the main benefit of virtualization in a GUI.

The most valuable feature is the stability of the solution. 

I would like to see an updated version of Microsoft Virtual Server that supports Linux.

We recently updated their special machines to the Linux version of Cybervisor, and we are also using VMware and Dell DXL. These platforms are more efficient than Microsoft Virtual Server, and we no longer carry on with Microsoft.

In the future release, I would like to see more automation. Moreover, improvements related to recovery could be beneficial.

I have used Microsoft Virtual Hyper-V for about six or seven years right now. 

The solution is very stable. We haven't had any critical issues. I don't think I have faced anything critical yet.

It is a scalable solution. There are about 200 end users using this solution. 

The customer service and support are very fast and efficient. 

The initial setup is very easy. It took around three to four hours to deploy the solution. 

We have one manager and two admins for the maintenance of the solution.

We just purchased our licenses from Microsoft, and it hasn't been an issue.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. It is a good product. It's very effective. Between Microsoft and VMware, Microsoft is cheaper than VMware. It doesn't have the same performance issue, but it will be enough for any small business.

We are a bookmaking firm. The solution is quite good for collaboration across multiple teams.

The product is reliable.

The product must provide better data analytics.

I have been using the solution for 15 years.

The tool is stable and accessible. It’s a robust and reliable solution.

The tool is scalable. We have 15 users. We use it every minute of the day.

The initial setup is simple. It is a cloud solution. Our operating system is server-based. To deploy the tool, we spoke to our software provider and linked up with a company that offers hosting services to deploy it on the cloud.

A third-party vendor helped us implement the solution. They also help us with maintenance and support.

The product’s reliability and accessibility are valuable to us.

I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for virtual machines.

The tool is perfectly stable. It was the only mature option when we were looking for a solution.

The product must provide easier rollouts. The booting of virtual servers must be made easier.

I have been using the solution for many years.

Ten people from our company are using the tool.

The initial setup was not straightforward. It was a bit of a pain.

The deployment can be done in-house. We required two people for the deployment and maintenance of the product.

We have a perpetual license for a specific server. The solution is very expensive.

I do not have much experience with server infrastructure. I recommend AWS to others. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

It is a good solution. If a company must have 100 physical servers, it can virtualize all those servers using Virtual Server. From a hundred physical servers, they can come to four physical servers. We can reduce the consumption.

The product helps with server management. It adds value to the business. It improves security and server management and reduces the cost of handling data filters. We can also add space for doing other things. The dashboard is valuable to us. It provides flexibility in the management of multiple servers. The tool provides flexibility in the configuration of different servers.

The solution must improve its pricing.

I have been using the solution for years.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is very, very scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. Our clients are small, medium, and large enterprises. The solution fits any requirement.

The technical support is good.

Neutral

The initial setup is very easy and straightforward. The deployment takes four hours.

The product must reduce the cost by 40%.

Microsoft is better than Linux.

People who want to use the product need to make a good assessment of their needs, build the right licensing program, and hire a great team to implement and support the solution. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Virtual Server to centralize and access all Active Directory and file servers. Additionally, we regulate the computers within the domain and manage user access to the systems.

Microsoft Virtual Server can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, depending on the specific business requirements of each organization.

The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory.

Server security can always be improved.

I have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for five years.

Microsoft Virtual Server is stable.

I give the scalability of Microsoft Virtual Server a ten out of ten.

Technical support is available anywhere in the world, but we haven't needed to contact them because our Microsoft Virtual Servers are functioning as expected.

The initial setup is straightforward. Anyone who has experience with Microsoft servers can set up their environment including the shared folders quickly.

For the deployment, we must first understand the organization's requirements and determine whether there will be external users accessing the system or if it will be limited to internal use only. We need to define the goals and then consider all the necessary components to facilitate the process. It is crucial to establish a centralized location, and depending on the complexity of the network topology, we can determine how it can serve external users effectively. Finally, we can begin testing the security measures and take note of the advantages and disadvantages that arise.

I give Microsoft Virtual Server a ten out of ten.

The number of people required for deployment and maintenance depends on the size of the organization. A small company can manage with one person, but I have also seen large organizations that required fifteen people.

Microsoft Virtual Servers can offer a secure, reliable, and scalable network environment, catering to the specific roles of servers for organizations of any size. I highly recommend utilizing Microsoft Virtual Servers.

We only use the VPN when we want to connect to our remote site. The VPN client or the branch will dial a VPN connection, and the connection is established. That's the time we have the link to connect to our branches.

Microsoft Virtual Server is a stable and easy-to-use solution.

The solution's user interface could be improved.

We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for one year.

I rate Microsoft Virtual Server an eight out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Virtual Server is a very scalable solution.

The solution's initial setup is very complex.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team. It took us four hours to deploy the solution. We follow basic procedures to deploy the solution.

Users should get formal training before using Microsoft Virtual Server.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Virtual Server an eight or nine out of ten.

I use the solution for internal applications.

The product is easy to set up.

The interface should be improved. The product should also improve its performance.

I have been using the solution for the last one year.

The tool is stable.

The tool is scalable. Around 125 people are using the solution in our company. It is extensively used. We need a technical staff, a manager, and an IT head to deploy and maintain the tool. The scalability must be improved.

It took more than six months to deploy the solution.

An integrator helped us with the deployment. We must check all the features before deploying the solution.

The pricing must be improved.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.