Microsoft Virtual Server Reviews

We use the solution for virtual machines.

The tool is perfectly stable. It was the only mature option when we were looking for a solution.

The product must provide easier rollouts. The booting of virtual servers must be made easier.

I have been using the solution for many years.

Ten people from our company are using the tool.

The initial setup was not straightforward. It was a bit of a pain.

The deployment can be done in-house. We required two people for the deployment and maintenance of the product.

We have a perpetual license for a specific server. The solution is very expensive.

I do not have much experience with server infrastructure. I recommend AWS to others. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Microsoft Virtual Server is user-friendly.

The platform’s dashboard features could be better.

I rate Microsoft Virtual Server’s stability a seven or eight out of ten. Sometimes, we have to restart it while updating firmware every six months.

The platform has good scalability. We have more than 40 servers and 975 clients using it. 

We can refer to many YouTube tutorials for the platform’s setup procedures. It helps our executives from the IT department. It takes ten minutes to complete and requires a team of five executives for the configuration.

It is an expensive product.

I rate Microsoft Virtual Server an eight out of ten. It is suitable for small and medium-sized businesses, as per my experience.

We are a data centre and hosting provider. We provide our clients with a dedicated server and VM. My client uses Microsoft Virtual Server to deploy website applications. 

The tool is productive and performs well. The server speed is also fast. 

We've faced challenges with migrating virtual machines from one host to another. Also, managing Microsoft updates has been a struggle. We have to update the host node every month when new updates are released, and our virtual machines go down every time there's an update. This causes downtime repeatedly and irritates our clients. It should also be lightweight. 

Microsoft Virtual Server is stable. 

My company has more than 1000 customers. 

We do not take direct support from Microsoft. We have experts in-house. 

We deploy the tool manually. The deployment process involves meeting the client's requirements. We install the necessary memory and configure the system to meet these specifications. My company has more than 100 resources to manage Microsoft Virtual Server. 

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. The tool's compatibility with other operating systems is fine. We enjoy better manageability because we handle everything in-house, leveraging our expertise in Microsoft. 

High Availability features Performance Monitoring

Sussex County is envisioning the future of computing and communications technologies, anticipating a new path to business process management. Visualizing and comparing business processes that aim to improve new process techniques and deployment. Identifying business process and standardizing them through best practices and e-Business opportunities enhances efficiencies in management, operations, transparency and governance.

Virtual Network Tools Security Tools Snapshot Management

7 years

Yes Exchange 2003 issues Software License

no

no

Very Good

Very Good

Yes Management of Virtual Enviroments

Complex. The P2V process had some issues

Both

CAPEX-160k OPEX-34k

Citrix Microsoft

This business concept will lead you to a positive business process of managing your systems.

We use it to spin up multiple virtuals that have different operating systems and we do different tests.

I appreciate the ease and speed with which I can set up and manage virtual machines using Microsoft Virtual Server.

The main thing that could be improved is the licensing cost. Additionally, enhancing the backup features would be beneficial.

I have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for 12 years.

I would rate the scalability as a nine out of ten. It is very stable.

I would rate the scalability as a seven out of ten.

Deploying virtual machines with Microsoft's virtualization is quick, taking just two or three minutes with our automation scripts. I can initiate it with a simple PowerShell command, and it is a solo task.

When it comes to ROI, the solution has saved us time and reduced costs by around 15%.

I would rate the costliness at a seven out of ten. It has a yearly licensing model.

For those considering this solution, my advice would be to plan for scalability by ensuring enough resources. Overall, I would rate Microsoft Virtual Server as an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for internal applications.

The product is easy to set up.

The interface should be improved. The product should also improve its performance.

I have been using the solution for the last one year.

The tool is stable.

The tool is scalable. Around 125 people are using the solution in our company. It is extensively used. We need a technical staff, a manager, and an IT head to deploy and maintain the tool. The scalability must be improved.

It took more than six months to deploy the solution.

An integrator helped us with the deployment. We must check all the features before deploying the solution.

The pricing must be improved.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use the solution to deploy the server for different use cases.

The product provides flexibility. It is a fast solution.

The tool must provide updates less frequently.

I have been using the solution for a couple of years.

I do not use the tool daily. More than 100 people use the product in my organization. We need four engineers to maintain the product.

The setup is easy.

The IT team implemented the solution with the help of an integrator.

I recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We build remote environments for customers who work remotely. We create virtual desktops that also work on phones for about 2,000 employees.

The solution is good at allowing end users to connect anytime and anywhere. The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation.

The bandwidth to Singapore could be scaled better. Moreover, the virtual desktop should be better at connecting back to the on-premises servers.

We have used the solution for one or two years.

I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is complex the first time you do it. The second and third times are easier, especially if you have a knowledgeable person helping. You would normally need about two engineers when deploying the solution.

When deploying the solution, you’ll have to focus on the network design with regards to WLAN and so on. After that, you’ll have to verify the phones and create user profiles.

We deployed the solution in-house using Microsoft documentation.