NetApp FAS Series Scalability
MC
Mustapha CHILAH
Directeur Adjoint Des Systèmes d'Informations& Transition at Mairie de Lunel
The product does improve our performance. It is scalable enough.
For scalability, we've found that even if you have a three-year-old service... the way NetApp works, we must buy new equipment every five or six years.
It's as if there's planned obsolescence... we don't have the option to upgrade the solution over a long period.
So, for scalability, I'd give it an eight out of ten. There was one instance where we needed to add disks, but the filer was full. We ran out of space to physically add them.
We had to buy extra equipment to support adding more disks to the filer when it reached maximum capacity.
View full review »TW
Tonya Wegner
Senior Storage Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
We could potentially scale up to 52 nodes. However, our most extensive deployment right now consists of 6 nodes.
View full review »DC
reviewer1359462
Principal Architect Infrastructure Solutions at a recruiting/HR firm with 501-1,000 employees
The product scales really well.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
NetApp FAS Series
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
815,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
1,000 users are using this solution.
View full review »EA
Elanchezhian Adhieksavan
Manager, System at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
The product does not allow us to add disks. We need to add a completely new disk shelf to scale the product. The solution is suitable for enterprise-level businesses.
View full review »MD
Mahesh Duraphe
Storage Administrator at Softcell Technologies Limited
It is a scalable product. I've seen it used at a bank in India with a large number of users and also at another customer site with about 250 users.
View full review »I find it to be scalable both vertically and horizontally. It's a ten. It's super easy to scale.
View full review »LS
Lori Slutz
System Administrator at Bechtel Plant Machinery, Inc.
Scalability is not something that I would have much experience in from this location. We're a smaller site with about 1500 users. It's not something that has to be extremely scalable at our location.
From talking to my coworkers at the larger locations, I believe that NetApp has become more scalable than they have been in the past, so they're going the right direction.
View full review »4,000-5,000 endpoints are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.
We started with two instances, and now we are running four. It was very easy to scale them. We assembled them, connected them, and the business has been running very well.
On the second upgrade that we did, it was quite different because they started licensing based on the capacity of the disks. I thought this was strange, but technically speaking, it was very easy to upgrade the environment with minimal knowledge needed.
The tool is scalable. It depends on the models, though. The entry-level models have limited scalability.
View full review »My impression on the scalability of the NetApp FAS Series is that it's good, but my usage is just below 50%, so scalability is not an issue for me.
View full review »I rate the product’s scalability an eight out of ten.
View full review »PS
Phyo Pyah Soe
Service manager at VST ECS
I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is pretty easy to scale. It's good for medium-sized enterprises and also for larger enterprises.
View full review »The tool is scalable and meets our requirements for TVs. It handles beta bytes well. We are happy with its scalability.
The solution is highly scalable. Its FAS2700 series can scale up to more than 1000 terabytes.
View full review »I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten. We have almost 100 users in Pakistan. Our customers are medium and enterprise-level businesses.
View full review »RS
Ricky Santos
System Administrator at ON Semiconductor Phils. Inc.
One of the big features of NetApp FAS is the clustering of storage, which allows you to scale up the whole cluster using different models. This is broad and each HA is expandable.
View full review »I haven’t had to scale in my department, but I foresee change in the near future because we’ll be taking on other portions of the government (medical, for example). Other portions will be somewhat isolated, but there is overlap.
View full review »AC
reviewer1586073
Broadcast Technology Director at a media company with 501-1,000 employees
Upgrading the data size is easy with the product. My company has 300 users.
View full review »The solution is scalable and can be added on to easily if needed.
View full review »Not yet
View full review »PM
Paul Macharia
ICT-I Manager at KTDA
We've had issues with scalability because the product that we were using went end-of-life many years ago, and we were not able to expand because there were no spares available.
View full review »The solution is scalable.
View full review »We’re still on 7-mode, but it still scales fairly well as the 6240 is a hefty machine.
View full review »GA
GeorgeAjayi
CEO at BDPR Technologies Limited
The NetApp FAS Series is scalable.
View full review »SR
reviewer1527378
Information Technology IT Manager Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is scalable to some extent. There is a limit, but then everything has a limit. We were using it at three sites across the US. We ran into this issue of hitting the limit just once in a while. When you are growing a cluster, you usually hit that limit.
View full review »The solution is scalable to some extent.
We have 400 nodes in one cluster and 1400 nodes in another cluster. Around 800-900 users are using the solution.
MK
reviewer1200537
Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The solution is scalable. It is recommended for medium companies.
View full review »NetApp FAS Series is a scalable solution. We scale transparently, and we scale out and scale up. If we are scaling up with heavy capacity, it's very simple. Once we loop it, we have it and send it. We don't even have downtime for that.
Sometimes it's tricky when we need to cluster several controllers and to scale-out many times. But it doesn't really have a major effect on our business. Sometimes we schedule it to let the business know that there might be some downtime for a period. We are finding ways to reduce the impact, and I think it's seamless. If I have to rate it, I'll give it 85%.
View full review »CP
reviewer852369
Sr. Sys. Server & Storage Egineer / Tech .Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The product is scalable. Five or six of our customers are using the solution.
View full review »WC
Wouter Coppens
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It acts as it was documented.
View full review »Scalability especially in SMB range has been well-received. So long as the environment is sized correctly, it’s been good.
View full review »AC
reviewer1586073
Broadcast Technology Director at a media company with 501-1,000 employees
NetApp has a structure that can grow very easily. You can expand by buying suitable model shelves. You can expand by the value allowed by the controller.
View full review »FK
reviewer1215186
Assistant Director, IT at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is scalable at the data level because it uses aggregates so you can easily increase data. But of course it's dependent on your provision for growth reports. I don't know how many use the solution but our company has around 600-700 employees and we have two people dealing with maintenance on the product. It doesn't require more than that.
You must have "flash cash" if you used the box to Oracle, any database environment, or any application that requires a lot of reads all time.
No issues encountered.
View full review »We've had no problems scaling. Our business has grown two and half times in size over six years, and we’ve added more disks and shelves, as well as upgrading controllers. We’ve done it without any down time.
View full review »It's highly scalable, especially with CDOT. We can scale out quickly.
View full review »As we continue forward, we can add additional heads with same IOPS.
View full review »AO
Akram Omer
IT Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
NetApp FAS Series is scalable.
We have approximately 500 users that use this solution in my organization.
We use NetApp FAS Series extensively in our organization and plan to upgrade it for SSD to be faster. We are running our production server on this storage and we use it every second of the day.
View full review »Amazing how scalable it is. As a comparison, we looked at EMC vBlock as well, and if you want to upgrade, you have to use a forklift. With FAS, you just put in new shelves or heads.
View full review »There have been no issues with scaling it, other than during the actual deployment of new devices.
View full review »7-mode scales very well. I’m even more impressed with where they intend to go with cDOT, but it may be rolled out prematurely.
View full review »We haven’t really grown it but I see a roadmap, the only problem there may be cost. It’s not an expensive product per se, but because of budget issues. People sometimes don’t evaluate the cost correctly.
View full review »It is very scalable. It has gotten much more scalable. With every level, it's becoming more and more scalable.
View full review »It's scaled well for us.
View full review »VF
reviewer1451304
IT Manager at a maritime company with 51-200 employees
It's scalable. You can scale as much as you can have.
We have approximately 500 end-users in our organization.
View full review »No issues, as expansion was a breeze.
View full review »Nope.
View full review »Scalability depends on how it’s ordered, which is the job of an integrator and dependent on the customer's needs.
View full review »We've never had an issue with Clustered Data ONTAP, but we did with 7-Mode solutions and large amounts of data in the PB range.
View full review »Depends on how you’re scaling. If wide, it works well. Vertical scaling not so well because we’re primarily SMB. No matter how brief, people don’t like being offline (e.g. baby monitors).
View full review »It’s good, but you have to do a lot of homework to scale horizontally and vertically. You need to have sales and engineering to expend effort to do that homework.
View full review »SV
Sami Ventriglia
Software & Services Advisor at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
None
View full review »The solution is scalable. We have not done much scaling but we know it can.
View full review »NetApp aggregates are scalable. You can keep adding shelves.
View full review »NetApp comes with an OS developed by its engineers, and its clustered data ONTAP, which supports clustering and scalability to a high level.
View full review »No scalability issues yet.
View full review »In the last growth, we went from a 3250 to an 8020. We’ve set it up to grow out easily by just adding trays.
View full review »Incredibly scalable. Not even touching what it could do. Between scale up and scale out, we’re not even close to reaching its highest potential. We have a four node NAS with the potential for 24 nodes.
View full review »It has scaled to our needs.
View full review »It scales to our needs.
View full review »Very scalable, haven’t reached its limits.
View full review »With cDOT, it's very good. It scales horizontally well, but not so well with 7-mode.
View full review »If we needed to scale beyond what we have now, we could do it. I would say NetApp's scalability is sufficient for our needs. We have hundreds of users accessing the file system on a daily basis.
View full review »We have six PB of data, and have had no problems with scalability.
View full review »It scales to a point, and then you buy more hardware. Doing a head swap (swapping out controllers) is not as easy as it used to be.
EH
EboHagan
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The scalability is also good. You can scale on the fly, just connect the cables. If you're adding a controller or you're adding big shelves, it's easy to move. It's excellent.
View full review »For the use cases I have had so far, scalability has been sufficient. But I don't know where the limits are. If you go into hundreds of millions of objects, you will probably see limits. Also, performance-wise, it's probably not the fastest solution on the market.
View full review »It’s scalable, but it could be easier. Just adding shelves might require additional cards and cabling, which can be difficult.
View full review »I love cluster ONTAP. Being able to scale out and being able to increase performance by adding more heads to a cluster and being able to do hybrid with regular storage on same platform is huge. You can move out easily too, they provide you the tools to do that, adding a lot of value.
View full review »PS
Phyo Pyah Soe
Service manager at VST ECS
The product is scalable.
View full review »EE
ErhanEvgin
Co-founder at Forest Technology
It is easily scalable. You can easily scale up and use old and new products together. NetApp products are very scalable.
View full review »SR
SenNetAd299025
Senior Network Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability is pretty good, but it's too expensive.
View full review »It scales for the kind of customers that we have.
View full review »It scales pretty well, and the limit is how much you want to spend on blades, shelves, controllers, etc.
View full review »With cDOT, it's very easy to scale out, and that's the reason we went with it in the first place.
View full review »MC
reviewer906021
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The solution is scalable.
We have approximately 30 people in my organization using this solution.
View full review »I'm satisfied with the scalability.
View full review »Yes, we have encountered issues. The system is limited by the number of enclosures.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
NetApp FAS Series
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
815,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.