Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetApp FAS Series Logo

NetApp FAS Series pros and cons

Vendor: NetApp
4.4 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
2,373 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

NetApp FAS Series offers improved performance and cost efficiency compared to other products, with optimized speed that does not degrade over time.
It enhances disaster recovery practices with its effective replication capabilities and offers easy expansion and management features for storage systems.
NetApp FAS Series supports efficient data management through features like deduplication, SnapVault, and SnapMirror, eliminating the need for traditional backup processes.
The integration with both on-premises and cloud providers is flexible, making it valuable for organizations looking for hybrid storage solutions.
NetApp FAS Series is recognized for its stability, reliability, and excellent vendor support, providing a solid foundation for demanding data environments.

CONS

NetApp FAS Series encounters limitations in scalability and flexibility.
Pricing for NetApp FAS Series is noted as expensive compared to competitors.
NetApp FAS Series lacks adequate support in certain regions, causing potential delays.
There is a need for improved replication features and integration with existing backup solutions in NetApp FAS Series.
NetApp FAS Series should address concerns related to hardware delivery and local warehousing.
 

NetApp FAS Series Pros review quotes

TW
Aug 10, 2023
The SnapMirror is a good tool because, as long as you're going NetApp to NetApp, it's ultimately the fastest way to move data. We replicate everything to another site for disaster recovery.
GA
Jan 17, 2022
Flexible and reliable storage solution with multiple features such as cloning, replication, and deduplication. Data migration can be done without any performance implications on the production systems.
LS
Jul 27, 2020
For us, the greatest aspect of the solution is the fact that it just runs. It is amazingly resilient. That's very important to us, because we are basically, with some exceptions, have a 24/7 operation.
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Temitope Oladeji - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 22, 2021
I like the unified management feature because sometimes you end up running a single protocol on the entire system.
AdrianoSimao - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 3, 2022
The replication feature is noteworthy because it's faster than most and it uses little bandwidth. Then there's the friendly interface that the equipment offers. With this interface, it is very easy to manage.
MC
Mar 12, 2024
At the moment, we use NetApp SnapMirror to replicate data to another filer at an offsite location for backup. So, I like this feature.
Hakan Pehlivan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 8, 2023
The most valuable feature of the NetApp FAS Series is its stability.
EH
Jul 16, 2018
One of the most valuable features offered is double-parity RAID, which guarantees that your data will stay intact. We're also able to provision storage and monitor which ones are really consuming storage.
Muhammad Alihyder Bhuiyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2024
It is a scalable solution.
Arnaud Salmon - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 17, 2023
The new FAS series is a good fit for some customers. We have good performance and capacity, even though it is full flash.
 

NetApp FAS Series Cons review quotes

TW
Aug 10, 2023
NetApp systems are somewhat more complex, though not excessively so. If you're transitioning from a Windows server environment to NetApp, get training or education; otherwise, you might struggle with this solution.
GA
Jan 17, 2022
No other area for improvement comes to mind other than its price. Making the price more attractive will help this solution have a bigger market share.
LS
Jul 27, 2020
The one aspect of the solution that's negative for us is also more unique to us due to the fact that we did a MetroCluster. The tiebreaker piece that does the monitoring of the two different locations, and determines if one is not talking to the network normally (or if it's truly down) is a little difficult. It feels like it was not designed from the beginning to fit well into the other pieces. It feels like it was thrown in at the last minute and it is not smooth.
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Temitope Oladeji - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 22, 2021
Interfacing with the cloud environment could be better. I want to be able to move some cloud volume and integrate it seamlessly with my home on-premise storage. Sometimes I have issues with port permissions. NetApp probably needs to improve more on the integration side from on-premise to the cloud.
AdrianoSimao - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 3, 2022
I think this kind of infrastructure is mostly obsolete. To keep up with developments in this space, you need to move all these features to an All-Flash solution.
MC
Mar 12, 2024
We have some experience with older equipment end-of-life. For example, when warranty support stops or updates stop – it can be frustrating. Not all clients can buy a new filer every year or two, and NetApp ending support a bit quickly can be a concern.
Hakan Pehlivan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 8, 2023
NetApp FAS Series should introduce an FTP application for the broadcast and post-production market.
EH
Jul 16, 2018
It lacks automatic tiering, When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives.
Muhammad Alihyder Bhuiyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2024
The high cost of the product is an area of concern, so from an improvement perspective, the tool needs to be made cheaper.
Arnaud Salmon - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 17, 2023
There is room for improvement in deployment and configuration processes.