- extensive GUI with many features allowing:
o broad control over inventory/discovery of standard systems, but also custom built equipment
o easy modeling of systems and applications
o easy addition of integrations with various data sources with various connection protocols
- fast (internal) "time to market" using special applications built "on top" like UCMDB Browser and Configuration Manager
- numerous and knowledgable support staff; fast turnaround on support cases
- extensive online support system, software communities and solutions resources
IT Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Provides visibility into IT infrastructures by automated discovery and dependency mapping
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
- can be rather expensive to implement (for smaller companies)
- can be support intensive
- requires a lot of project resources to push toward implementation
- requires a number of people to operate
- as game changing technology requires a mature IT service organization, numerous resources for project management, design, implementation, evangelization
- requires serious upper echelon management backing (sponsorship)
For how long have I used the solution?
6 years
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
HP releases CUPS and Content Packs on a regular basis. Implementing these requires careful planning and analysis, but helps keeping the product in good working shape.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service:
HP customer service is usually very personal, reachable and effective.
Technical Support:HP Software Support is a very large and skilled organization, with experience dating back decades.
How was the initial setup?
Setup is straightforward, but it does require planning and design.
What about the implementation team?
In-house.
What other advice do I have?
Large telcos with a history of mergers and acquisitions will benefit from this technology by discovering exactly which components are located where in their data centers, how they're connected and what their status is, facilitating consolidation/transformation of DC infrastructures as well as reducing mean time to resolution in case of incidents. Evaluation is a speedy process because results are visible quickly (imagine a simple scan of a couple hundred Windows servers and presenting the resulting map to a Windows SDM). Usually leads to "oh nice, can we do x or y as well?". Which is what you're doing it for initially.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
My experiences using UCMDB with Configuration Manager
With HP UCMDB we bring clarity and order to the surrounding jungle of IT infrastructure components and the myriad ways in which they're interrelated. HP UCMDB brings us a standardized data model and CMDB, which serves as a single source of truth and as a foundation for integrations with other tools in the ITSM sphere, like Service Manager and BSM.
HP UCMDB (Universal Configuration Management Database) usually comes packaged with two other products, the UCMDB Browser and Configuration Manager.
The UCMDB Browser enables us to quickly give access to the CMDB contents for large numbers of users, whereas the Java GUI allows UCMDB admins and analysts to develop Views and Reports which serve to satisfy the organization's CI information needs.
With Configuration Manager, or CM for short, it becomes possible to quickly use the discovered data in UCMDB for comparative purposes, like policy checking. The idea is that you create model, or views, in UCMDB and then use those as a basis in CM. The TQLs created in UCMDB produce CI’s, which are then used in CM to compare with each other (environment segmentation analysis), or with standards (policy checking, state comparison over time). CM can then produce lists/reports alerting you to changes, which you can then authorize. Or not.
Another approach is to quickly select a number of CI’s, like computers, compare them with one another to produce a view on the segmentation, or fragmentation, of hardware standards in IT. Any which way you use CM, it gives a configuration manager a tool to very quickly turn his new CMDB into hard currency.
If the Configuration Manager is the only one working with CM, it requires him (or her) to have an understanding of modeling in UCMDB, since models form the basis of CI checking in CM. So there’s a little ramping of knowledge, but once done, results are produced very quickly. The whole mess of CI’s suddenly comes alive and kicking.
With UCMDB version 10, HP has introduced a large number of improvements and changes. One of the main ones is the addition of inventory based discovery. It is now possible to deploy inventory scanners to target hosts, which inventory installed software using a technique called DDMi, previously found in HP Asset Manager. Now application signature based inventory and license information gathering comes into the domain of UCMDB without the need for integration.
A clear Business Case for UCMDB can be the migration of a Data Center, or the need to increase Configuration Management process credibility by improving IT infrastructure data quality.
ROI may take a little bit, because there's an investment, and it depends on the way the solution is introduced in the organization, it needs leverage by proper upper echelons sponsorship and lower echelon product evangelisation (using demos and bootcamps) how long it will take for the solution to "take", but as soon as it does, information requests will roll in from all corners and the product will prove its worth.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Service Management Consultant with 10,001+ employees
It can feed in from multiple sources and upload into various Service Management toolsets
What is our primary use case?
Mainly, it is used as a central repository to store our CMS data from various sources. We use it to store data from collection points as well as upload them into tools, such as Service Manager.
What is most valuable?
The ability to use it as our single source of truth. It can feed in from multiple sources and upload into various Service Management toolsets, not just Micro Focus ones.
How has it helped my organization?
It has allowed us to centralise the feeds and sources. Previously, like many companies, we stored CMS data in various places and various systems, and they did not always match.
What needs improvement?
Some of the UI could always be improved, but that is personal taste. I am a big fan of removing thick clients and thick servers and making everything Web UI.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Perhaps, we used various Service Management toolsets to store data.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Product Categories
Configuration Management DatabasesPopular Comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions: