Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
UNIX Security Consultant at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Enables increased resilience but lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication
Pros and Cons
  • "I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product."
  • "The product lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used for block storage for an OpenStack environment. I'm the Information Team Lead.

How has it helped my organization?

The product allows our OpenStack environment to move away from the classic network type of backend storage. It enables increased resilience using commodity hardware pricing and that is a major benefit. In comparison to a solution such as FlashBlade, for the capacity and performance you get, Ceph Storage is half the price.

What is most valuable?

I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product. 

What needs improvement?

Ceph Storage lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication. That is a huge loss in terms of performance. It's also very intensive on the backend network and takes a lot of resources from the network. I'd like to see a higher performing CephFS, which is the file system part of Ceph.

Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

The company has been using this solution for the past five years, I've been using it for 12 months. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable, but if you've chosen erasure coding, migrating to a different configuration is difficult and requires some knowledge.

How are customer service and support?

We haven't dealt with technical support, any issues are dealt with in-house. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quite straightforward. The documentation describes it perfectly, and it's quite clear as long as you know what you want. We deployed in-house. The planning took a couple of days, making our choices, etc. and the effective deployment took half a day.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Red Hat Ceph is an open-source product so it's self-supported in our environment.

What other advice do I have?

My suggestion is to try before you buy so you know it's the right solution. It's not one-size-fits-all. The product has plenty of potential for growth, but the parts where we would like to see growth are not necessarily where the vendor is focusing its attention.

I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Chairul Manalu - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer (Devops) at PT.Prima Sarana Solusi
Real User
Top 5
Works as cloud storage but needs improvement in integration
Pros and Cons
  • "We use the solution for cloud storage."
  • "We have encountered slight integration issues."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for cloud storage. 

What needs improvement?

We have encountered slight integration issues. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for more than two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Red Hat Ceph Storage is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is scalable, and we have around 200 users. 

How are customer service and support?

The tool's tech support is fast and consists of knowledgeable resources. 

How was the initial setup?

Red Hat Ceph Storage's installation is simple and takes around four to five days to complete. 

What about the implementation team?

A consultant helped us with the deployment. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user860841 - PeerSpot reviewer
Unix Solutions Manager at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Data redundancy means no data or service loss during disk/server failure
Pros and Cons
  • "Data redundancy is a key feature, since it can survive failures (disks/servers). We didn’t lose our data or have a service interruption during server/disk failures."
  • "Rebalancing and recovery are a bit slow."

What is our primary use case?

We used Ceph as back-end storage for our internal cloud, based on OpenStack.

Our environment was a small open-source OpenStack cloud, on 10 Dell servers, each with two 1TB disks. We installed Ceph on each server to handle those disks and integrated OpenStack Cinder with Ceph to be used as cloud storage instances.

How has it helped my organization?

Scale out storage and storage redundancy.

What is most valuable?

Data redundancy, since it can survive failures (disks/servers). We didn’t lose our data or have a service interruption during server/disk failures.

What needs improvement?

Rebalancing and recovery are a bit slow.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I used it for about two years. We had no service interruption and no loss of data.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have used (or know) the following distributed/shared file systems: Gluster, NFS, GFS2, and Ceph. For me, Ceph is one of the best.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Bo Zhang - PeerSpot reviewer
Bo ZhangSolution Co-founder/Partnership Alliance at Sans Digital
User

Yes, agree. What about capacity utilization? Can Ceph data redundancy easily achieve 80% usable?

it_user854061 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Not mature yet, bugs and errors during install, but opens doors for completely open-source cloud
Pros and Cons
  • "Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud."
  • "Ceph is not a mature product at this time. Guides are misleading and incomplete. You will meet all kind of bugs and errors trying to install the system for the first time. It requires very experienced personnel to support and keep the system in working condition, and install all necessary packets."

What is our primary use case?

We use it as cloud storage, connected to OpenNebula cloud system for one of our customers. System includes 56 Supermicro nodes that are specially configured to be used as a hyperconverged system. Same nodes used for storage and virtualization.

How has it helped my organization?

It opens doors for completely open-source cloud. No monthly charges, no revenue share policy. It just works.

What is most valuable?

When going open-source, there is actually not much of a choice. Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud.

What needs improvement?

Ceph is not a mature product at this time. Guides are misleading and incomplete. You will meet all kind of bugs and errors trying to install the system for the first time. It requires very experienced personnel to support and keep the system in working condition, and install all necessary packets.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The system needs some polishing to be stable enough for a production environment.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

CEPH is scalable to almost infinity.

How are customer service and technical support?

We didn’t use Red Hat services, due to bad experience with them in the past. They usually play email ping pong, while you solve the problems yourself.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

None. This was a pilot project and it has worked out.

How was the initial setup?

It is complex. Before the system is built, all your technical staff must research as much about CEPH technology as they can.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We tried Scality. It is the perfect solution, but was out of budget.

What other advice do I have?

Think twice.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Engineer at Orcadt
Real User
Top 20
Solution is highly stable and it takes less than a half hour to set up
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the stability of the product."
  • "The storage capacity of the solution can be improved."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the stability of the product. 

What needs improvement?

The storage capacity of the solution can be improved. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for ten years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate stability a nine out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We use this solution in our internal app. Around fifty people in our organization use this solution. I would rate the scalability a six out of ten. 

How are customer service and support?

We solve a problem by searching on Google instead of contacting technical support. We never communicated with the support team. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously we used a product that we developed in-house.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy. It takes less than an hour to install this product. 

To perform maintenance, security experts and developers are needed. About three to four people are required for maintenance.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend others to use this product if they get the chance. I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Software Test Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
Replicated and erasure coded pools allow multiple copies, easy scale-out of nodes
Pros and Cons
  • "Replicated and erasure coded pools have allowed for multiple copies to be kept, easy scale-out of additional nodes, and easy replacement of failed hard drives. The solution continues working even when there are errors."
  • "It needs a better UI for easier installation and management."

What is our primary use case?

  • File Services NFS and CIFS (RBD images)
  • Object Services S3 and Swift (radosgw)
  • I/O into replicated and erasure coded pools (librados)

How has it helped my organization?

Replicated and erasure coded pools have allowed for multiple copies to be kept, easy scale-out of additional nodes, and easy replacement of failed hard drives. The solution continues working even when there are errors.

What is most valuable?

I/O into replicated and erasure coded pools (librados).

What needs improvement?

It needs a better UI for easier installation and management.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has provided retention of all customer sites on which it has been installed in the last three years, with no catastrophic failures so far.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user774150 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer
Real User
A scale-out solution designed to be free of scale limitations common when using proprietary storage solutions
Pros and Cons
  • "Ceph’s ability to adapt to varying types of commodity hardware affords us substantial flexibility and future-proofing."
  • "Routing around slow hardware."

How has it helped my organization?

Ceph has allowed us to deploy block storage for our users in a reliable, performance, and easy to manage fashion without vendor lock-in.

What is most valuable?

By being open source, Ceph is not tied to the whim or fortunes of any one vendor. The community of Ceph code contributors and admins is large and active. Ceph’s ability to adapt to varying types of commodity hardware affords us substantial flexibility and future-proofing.

What needs improvement?

Routing around slow hardware.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Ceph is more stable than many proprietary solutions.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Ceph is a scale-out solution designed to be free of scale limitations common when using proprietary storage solutions. Ceph will continue to scale meeting our needs for years to come.

How are customer service and technical support?

Red Hat’s technical support is valuable, but with Ceph, one can often do well with community resources.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used traditional storage on much smaller scales: ZFS, SVM, VxVM, and NetApp. They do not fit the use case and demands of a growing Cloud infrastructure.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is straightforward with automation tools.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Not applicable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Ceph is de facto for mixed modality of cloud storage.

What other advice do I have?

Pick up a copy of this excellent book: Learning Ceph - Second Edition.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Rifat Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Architect & CEO at Tirzok Private Limited
Real User
Brilliant, performance-intensive storage system
Pros and Cons
  • "It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability."
  • "An area for improvement would be that it's pretty difficult to manage synchronous replication over multiple regions."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution as the RBD and FS system for block storage.

What is most valuable?

The best features are performance, open measure for hardware options, and scalability.

What needs improvement?

An area for improvement would be that it's pretty difficult to manage synchronous replication over multiple regions. I also don't like the containerization method for Cephadm in the recent deployment. In the next release, I'd like to see reports for security and performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with this solution for approximately five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a very stable system, and I see very linear performance growth over expansions, so I'm more or less happy with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was pretty good, I deployed it completely in one day.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of this product isn't high.

What other advice do I have?

Companies that can afford completely flash-based pipe servers should go for Ceph. It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability. I would rate it as eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS, and more!
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS, and more!