Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM Spectrum Virtualize support is reliable but criticized for inconsistent Level-1 help, hard-to-reach experts, and limited live troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
5.5
Opinions on Red Hat Ceph Storage support vary; some value it, others prefer community forums or internal solutions.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
IBM Spectrum Virtualize offers efficient scalability and flexibility but desires improvements in node capabilities and volume count scalability.
Sentiment score
7.3
Red Hat Ceph Storage scales well with user feedback, though latency and planning challenges require consideration and deployment tools.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
IBM Spectrum Virtualize is favored for high availability and reliability, with minimal downtime and robust data management capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat Ceph Storage is highly reliable and stable, with minor issues in data rebalancing, latency, and recovery.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Spectrum Virtualize needs enhanced stability, new features like data deduplication, improved GUI, cloud integration, and better management tools.
Red Hat Ceph Storage faces challenges in performance, usability, documentation, integration, and resource optimization, needing various improvements.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Spectrum Virtualize offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing, appealing entry-level costs, and potential savings through vendor collaboration.
Enterprise buyers appreciated Red Hat Ceph Storage's reasonable pricing and flexible licensing, with the option for support depending on expertise.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Spectrum Virtualize excels in seamless data migration, virtualization, disaster recovery, scalability, and user-friendly management with high performance.
Red Hat Ceph Storage provides scalable, reliable, and flexible storage solutions with self-healing architecture and easy integration for various needs.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Virtualize
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
12th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of IBM Spectrum Virtualize is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 19.9%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
 

Featured Reviews

EdwinVan Halm - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise product that delivers high performance features
The primary use case is high availability and disaster recovery. They use it as an active-active cluster located in two physical locations for quick recovery using immutable snapshots The quick restore, the low latency, and the ease of use are some of the most valuable features. The product is…
Prajwal Kabbinale - PeerSpot reviewer
Overall satisfied , with easy implementation ,having a notification feature would be helpful
Our primary use case is for integration with OpenStack for block and object storage We use both Red Hat Ceph and Azure storage, for all staging and non-production. Most of the features are beneficial and one does not stand out above the rest. The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Virtualize?
I have no idea of the pricing as I am not part of the sales team. However, the product is a little bit more expensive due to the high-end enterprise features it offers.
What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Virtualize?
The training program could be improved. It would be beneficial to have a lab environment to train myself before implementing it at a customer's location.
What is your primary use case for IBM Spectrum Virtualize?
The primary use case is high availability and disaster recovery. They use it as an active-active cluster located in two physical locations for quick recovery using immutable snapshots.
How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?
The high availability of the solution is important to us.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?
Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ceph
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pelephone, Sprint IT Enterprise Services
Dell, DreamHost
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.