Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Red Hat Ceph Storage pros and cons

Vendor: Red Hat

4.1 out of 5

23 reviews
81% willing to recommend

2,786 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Red Hat Ceph Storage offers block and object storage from a single cluster, enhancing flexibility and efficiency. It ensures reliability and data redundancy, making it ideal for cloud applications. Despite challenges like slow recovery during network failures and high CPU usage, it provides scalability and cost-effectiveness. However, installation issues, performance dips, and limited geo-replication support present challenges. Future improvements could include deduplication and optimized rebalancing to enhance functionality.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat Ceph Storage provides both block and object storage in one cluster, offering flexibility and future-proofing with commodity hardware.

Its reliability allows for data redundancy, surviving hardware failures without data loss or service interruption.

Integration features support various storage needs, eliminating the necessity for multiple storage systems, like OpenStack Swift or GlusterFS.

High availability and stability are key benefits, along with performance-intensive capabilities and scalability.

Red Hat Ceph Storage adds cost-related value and offers a unique experience compared to traditional storage systems.

CONS

Ceph struggles with network failures and individual storage node failures, leading to longer recovery times.

Geo-replication and synchronous replication over multiple regions are areas needing improvement.

Installing Ceph involves misleading guides and requires experienced personnel, as users encounter bugs and errors during the initial setup.

Documentation is incomplete and hard to find, needing enhancements for better clarity.

Rebalancing and recovery are slow, consuming a lot of CPU and network bandwidth without efficient deduplication features.

Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros review quotes

AB

Sr. Systems Engineer at Adobe

Jul 5, 2017

The ability to provide block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster is very valuable for us.

Read full review

Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Feb 1, 2023

The solution is pretty stable.

Read full review

Systems Engineer at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

Apr 22, 2018

Ceph has simplified my storage integration. I no longer need two or three storage systems, as Ceph can support all my storage needs. I no longer need OpenStack Swift for REST object storage access, I no longer need NFS or GlusterFS for filesystem sharing, and most importantly, I no longer need LVM or DRBD for my virtual machines in OpenStack.

Read full review

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: January 2025.

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Director Of Operations at Diverse

Jun 27, 2022

What I found most valuable from Red Hat Ceph Storage is integration because if you are talking about a solution that consists purely of Red Hat products, this is where integration benefits come in. In particular, Red Hat Ceph Storage becomes a single solution for managing the entire environment in terms of the container or the infrastructure, or the worker nodes because it all comes from a single plug.

Read full review

FC

Flavio Carvalho

Senior Information Technology Specialist at Logicalis

Apr 11, 2018

We have some legacy servers that can be associated with this structure. With Ceph, we can rearrange these machines and reuse our investment.

Read full review

ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI

IT Private Cloud & Infrastructure Leader at Sicredi

Dec 4, 2024

Ceph Storage allows us to add value related to cost and offers a unique experience compared to traditional storage.

Read full review

reviewer1125696

UNIX Security Consultant at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 26, 2022

I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product.

Read full review

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Apr 11, 2018

Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud.

Read full review

JP

Owner at Tetra | Healthy Technology

Apr 28, 2022

Red Hat Ceph Storage is a reliable solution, it works well.

Read full review

Senior Software Engineer

Nov 16, 2017

Ceph’s ability to adapt to varying types of commodity hardware affords us substantial flexibility and future-proofing.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 23)

Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons review quotes

AB

Sr. Systems Engineer at Adobe

Jul 5, 2017

Ceph does not deal very well with, or takes a long time to recover from, certain kinds of network failures and individual storage node failures.

Read full review

Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Feb 1, 2023

If you use for any other solution like other Kubernetes solutions, it's not very suitable.

Read full review

Systems Engineer at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

Apr 22, 2018

I have encountered issues with stability when replication factor was not 3, which is the default and recommended value. Go below 3 and problems will arise.

Read full review

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: January 2025.

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Director Of Operations at Diverse

Jun 27, 2022

What could be improved in Red Hat Ceph Storage is its user interface or GUI.

Read full review

FC

Flavio Carvalho

Senior Information Technology Specialist at Logicalis

Apr 11, 2018

In the deployment step, we need to create some config files to add Ceph functions in OpenStack modules (Nova, Cinder, Glance). It would be useful to have a tool that validates the format of the data in those files, before generating a deploy with failures.

Read full review

ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI

IT Private Cloud & Infrastructure Leader at Sicredi

Dec 4, 2024

While the documentation for Ceph Storage is helpful, it could be improved.

Read full review

reviewer1125696

UNIX Security Consultant at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 26, 2022

The product lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication.

Read full review

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Apr 11, 2018

Ceph is not a mature product at this time. Guides are misleading and incomplete. You will meet all kind of bugs and errors trying to install the system for the first time. It requires very experienced personnel to support and keep the system in working condition, and install all necessary packets.

Read full review

JP

Owner at Tetra | Healthy Technology

Apr 28, 2022

It took me a long time to get the storage drivers for the communication with Kubernetes up and running. The documentation could improve it is lacking information. I'm not sure if this is a Ceph problem or if Ceph should address this, but it was something I ran into. Additionally, there is a performance issue I am having that I am looking into, but overall I am satisfied with the performance.

Read full review

Senior Software Engineer

Nov 16, 2017

Routing around slow hardware.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 23)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

File and Object Storage

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StarWind Virtual SAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

DataCore SANsymphony vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Scality RING vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StorMagic SvSAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

IBM Spectrum Scale vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Zadara vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Red Hat Gluster Storage vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

HPE StoreVirtual vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

LINBIT SDS vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StorPool vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

File and Object Storage

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StarWind Virtual SAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

DataCore SANsymphony vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Scality RING vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StorMagic SvSAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

IBM Spectrum Scale vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Zadara vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Red Hat Gluster Storage vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

HPE StoreVirtual vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

LINBIT SDS vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

StorPool vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

See all alternatives

Related questions

1

Storpool or Red Hat Ceph: Which Do You Recommend?

831

How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?

583

I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?

47

Storpool vs. ScaleIO

43

When evaluating Software Defined Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

19

What are some design considerations to keep in mind for Software Defined Storage Solutions?

230

What are the advantages and limitations of Software Defined Storage?

37

What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?

23

What SDS solution do you recommend?

3

Why is Software Defined Storage (SDS) important for companies?