Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1715886 - PeerSpot reviewer
SQL Server Senior Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
High performance, easy installation, but better integration needed
Pros and Cons
  • "SQL Server has good performance. It is one of the best features."
  • "SQL Server could improve the integration with nonrational database solutions, such as MongoDB."

What is our primary use case?

SQL Server can be used for managing and storing information.

I have a lot of databases with more than one terabyte of information and we use technology, such as Stretch database to switch out the information to Azure databases with this type of technology.

What needs improvement?

SQL Server could improve the integration with nonrational database solutions, such as MongoDB.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using SQL Server for eight years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

SQL Server has good performance. It is one of the best features.

Buyer's Guide
SQL Server
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about SQL Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have approximately 300 instances of SQL Server. 

I have approximately five customers using this solution.

How are customer service and support?

I currently have one ticket open with Microsoft support and I have been waiting about two days. However, it's not a critical incident. The technical support they provide us is good.

How was the initial setup?

In the latest version of SQL Server, Microsoft has split the product. For example, if you want to start with the engine or the reporting server you have to download it separately.  I think that the installation is easier on the new versions. There are other kinds of options that you can set up in the installation progress. For example, the number of 10 DV files or the limit of maximum use of memory.

The installation process takes approximately 10 minutes.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is a license to use this solution. However, the model is not easy to understand. There is a guide you have to read about all the information on how it works. If you read this documentation, you can understand how it works. We are paying for our SQL Servers by CPU cores with an enterprise license.

What other advice do I have?

If a new company wants to implement SQL Server, they need to know that there should be a person who has all the knowledge about DBA position, such as how the SQL Server will be set up because I have a lot of customers and when I checked they have a lot of bad options or practicing in their SQL Servers instance. If someone wants to start with SQL Server, they have to improve and have good knowledge about this technology. It's important to have knowledge about this technology. They should take some courses or maybe have a person who has all the knowledge about this technology with certification, it's the most important. It's not easy to keep up to date with the best practice from a provider, in this case, Microsoft.

I rate SQL Server a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Sundaresan Subramanyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder and Managing Director at Analytic Brains Technologies Private Limited
Real User
Feature-rich databases and user-friendly interface
Pros and Cons
  • "SQL Server's Management Studio is very user friendly. I like their database and the additional features it offers. It's also easy to integrate SQL Server with things like CLR, PowerShell, and command shell"
  • "I would like to see SQL Server add the ability to write to multiple sites or support replication between multiple sites at the transaction level."

What is our primary use case?

SQL Server can be useful for a lot of businesses and enterprise solutions. SQL Server is very powerful and useful when you need to store, retrieve, process, and analyze a large amount of data. In my organization, almost everyone uses SQL Server. That's about 10 people using it.

What is most valuable?

SQL Server's Management Studio is very user-friendly. I like their database and the additional features it offers. It's also easy to integrate SQL Server with things like CLR, PowerShell, and command shell

What needs improvement?

I would like to see SQL Server add the ability to write to multiple sites or support replication between multiple sites at the transaction level. If we can have data available on multiple sites as quickly as possible, that would be a great feature.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using SQL Server for around 10 years. I have 30 years of experience in the IT industry. In that time, I have worked on different kinds of databases, such as Oracle. Before that, I worked on FoxPro. I have also worked with PostgreSQL.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's absolutely scalable. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Our clients are the end-users of the SQL Server applications, and we do all the development and maintenance for them. So anything related to support, our clients take care of it.

How was the initial setup?

I work on the development and performance-tuning side, so I don't do the installation but my guess would be that it is pretty straightforward by now. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I am not aware of the cost because our clients take care of them, but I think there are enterprise licenses. If you go for Azure Cloud databases, then you just can pay as you go.

What other advice do I have?

SQL Server is my favorite database. Because I've been working on it for so many years, I like it. I have only good things to say about it. I would rate SQL Server nine out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
SQL Server
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about SQL Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1478394 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Good for publishing web applications, but security, stability and performance can be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "We have found the feature that allows us to publish web applications to be valuable."
  • "As we have faced problems with the solution in both the past and present, I feel it could be more stable."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for nearly all of the services we provide that utilize Windows Server. We use it to provide continuous service and in respects of our mail server. 

What is most valuable?

We have found the feature that allows us to publish web applications to be valuable. 

We have 20 servers and we use disparate ones for different applications, such as Kaspersky Anti-Virus Server and Windows SharePoint in respects of the surveillance system. 

What needs improvement?

The solution should be more secure and stable and have better performance, particularly as concerns the endpoint operating systems. I would like to have a better operating system that links the CPU and the RAM efficiently.

For the majority of our servers we have not used other operating systems, although there are certain features or requirements that necessitated their use, such as Red Hat. This was rare. Mostly, we used Windows OS. 

As for the performance issue, we have recently encountered situations in which everything would fail in spite of the CPU and memory being 100 percent operable. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using SQL Server for 12 or 13 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

As we have faced problems with the solution in both the past and present, I feel it could be more stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution seems scalable to me. 

How are customer service and technical support?

We have not had experience with technical support and have handled this independently whenever we encountered problems. 

How was the initial setup?

When it comes to the installation of the operating system, we have found it to be easy and user-friendly. 

Our greatest praise for the solution we reserve for its ease of installation and usage. These provide definite advantages. Perhaps this can be attributed to the fact that we have always made use of the solution for nearly every relevant company in South Africa.

While I cannot recall exactly how long the installation lasted, I did recently install endpoint Windows 10 Operating System and this took an hour and a half. 

We were able to handle the installation on our own, as we are well versed in this process when it comes to Windows OS.

On an individual basis, we solely make use of Windows OS. There are between 300 and 400 people in our organization who do so. 

Generally speaking, we do not make use of a technical team for deployment and maintenance purposes and do so internally. There are a maximum of seven or eight people in our organization who are responsible for this. We are talking about technical people who are responsible for the direct installation and configuration of Windows OS and they do not include managers. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I believe the licensing to be on an annual basis. In 2019 we purchased a three year license. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other other options before going with the solution. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate SQL Server as a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1362099 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to use, with good performance but could have better pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The performance is good."
  • "The pricing in general could be better."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is primarily used for studying data and statistics. We have some services that we are monitoring and keeping records and doing reports, and we use it for that.

What is most valuable?

The solution is quite stable.

The solution has the capability of scaling.

The performance is good. 

It's very easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The solution was delivered to us, and we really don't interface with the solution directly. I can't speak to any features that are missing.

The only people that can use it directly are developers. It's not for everyday users.

The pricing in general could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for about five years or so. It's been a while.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. It's reliable. We do not deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution can scale, however, it's dependant on the hardware. It's not limitless.

There are about ten users using the solution at this time.

We do have plans to increase usage in the future.

How are customer service and technical support?

We don't interface with Microsoft support. We always go to the vendor that performed the integration for us.

How was the initial setup?

We did not implement the solution. We had it delivered to us.

I've done an installation in the past, however, not at this company. It's straightforward. It's simple due to the fact that it's going to be installed on the Microsoft operating system, not like MySQL that's used on a Linux server.

Deployment may take about 15 minutes or so.

We have a technical team of about eight people that can handle maintenance as necessary.

What about the implementation team?

We had an integrator deliver the solution to us, as we are not ourselves developers.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't have any details on the licensing in terms of any details or costs. It's not an aspect of the solution I directly deal with.

What other advice do I have?

We are just customers and end-users. We don't have any business relationship with the company.

We use the express edition of the solution.

It was delivered as part of a solution. We are not developers. It was a turnkey solution delivered to us by an integrator, and we are doing some maintenance, however, we are not developing the content of the database. It was used as part of our services for maybe five years or more.

The database is on the back end. We are using it with our applications at the front end that we are interfacing with. In terms of the SQL server, we don't go and use it directly. We use it through the application. There's an application that is providing a user interface for us, and we work on that user interface. We don't work on the native interface of the SQL server.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. I've heard that Oracle is better.

I'd recommend this solution to other companies.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1501629 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Officer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Good SSMS and profiling tools that work well for internal applications
Pros and Cons
  • "I like that the new version has a memory-optimized table to improve the performance."
  • "I would like to see the performance improved. Migrating should be easier and the scalability needs improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We use SQL Server for our internal applications.

What is most valuable?

Working with SQL Server, it is quite convenient to use the SSMS tools to write a profile. I also like the profiling tools.

I like that the new version has a memory-optimized table to improve the performance.

What needs improvement?

We had some difficulty doing the performance tuning when we migrated from the 2008 version to the 2016 version. We experienced a drop in the performance. We could not understand or figure out what caused the drop in performance. We did not change any settings to cause this effect. We tried to keep the same settings.

We feel that when running the 2008 version, it was much quicker in terms of performance. 

That is an area of SQL Server that can be improved. Moving to a new version, you shouldn't have to change the configuration.

We have not been able to utilize it fully because it is not straightforward.

I would like to see the performance improved. Migrating should be easier and the scalability needs improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for many years. 

We are using version 2016.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, it has some room for improvement.

We have 20 people in our organization who are using this solution.

How are customer service and technical support?

We don't usually get support from Microsoft. We get it from our software vendors or we try to do it ourselves.

We are somewhat satisfied with the support that we have received from the vendor, but not fully because of the issue we faced when we moved to a newer version. But in other areas, it's okay.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used SQL Server from the beginning.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was moderate. It was not easy but it was not difficult.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate SQL Server a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user272976 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Consultant
Capable, efficient, OLAP server for Analysis Services; has Big-Data performance issues
Pros and Cons
  • "It's a very capable, efficient, price-performant OLAP server."
  • "The web interface and the command line interface could be better so we could manage and build some things around an API. If we could build our own solution, our own interface, and then manage the solution through that open API, that would be better."
  • "For a big amount of data, when we are speaking about IoT Segments, and Big Data projects, there are performance issues."

What is our primary use case?

Initially as a post-transactional database, but now it's mainly a transactional database and for Analysis Services.

How has it helped my organization?

It's a very capable, efficient, price-performant OLAP server on which we can build our solutions.

What is most valuable?

Analysis Services, because we are an independent software vendor in the business-intelligence area.

What needs improvement?

The web interface and the command line interface could be better so we could manage and build some things around an API. If we could build our own solution, our own interface, and then manage the solution through that open API, that would be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

With the new, big releases, there's quite a lot of work that we have to do. From 2005 to 2008, and then from 2012 to 2016. But, otherwise, it's quite stable. It's nice.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Even for us, it's quite okay. For the type of customers we have now, it's okay. But, for a big amount of data, when we are speaking about IoT Segments, and Big Data projects, there are performance issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

If there wasn't Stack Overflow, that would be a problem. But luckily there are also other resources on the web which we can use to help ourselves. Just depending on Microsoft support it would not be so great.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used PostgreSQL, and we also used some other OLAP servers.

How was the initial setup?

It's more and more complex. The 2005 version was very nice and neat, but now it's more and more complicated.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price has been going higher and higher. The market is quite price sensitive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

At that time there was also Sybase, Oracle, MySQL. That's at the time those databases were up.

What other advice do I have?

It's good if you need OLAP services.

I give it a seven out of 10 overall, because of the things mentioned: First is that during the version upgrades, sometimes things are complicated. The second thing is the support is not so... without an open-source community it would not be so good. Third is the pricing, because it's changing, sometimes it's confusing.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user796899 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Database and Application Administrator with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It will do clustering, so you can have two database servers looking at the same data simultaneously
Pros and Cons
  • "You could have an offsite and an onsite, and if the onsite goes down, the offsite picks it up. I like that flexibility to provide continuing operations."
  • "It is a simple query language. It is consistent across all versions. If you start with an older version, move to the newer version. The same code will still work."
  • "It can go easily on a virtual machine and be accommodated by a virtual machine easily. That is a plus, as not all databases can handle that."
  • "It will do clustering, so you can have two database servers looking at the same data simultaneously."
  • "It pesters you to update the Client every month when there is nothing new that you really need to add, but it is constantly pestering you. I do not care for it."

How has it helped my organization?

It allows me to obtain access to data that I would not otherwise obtain access to from different programs. It has helped pull statistics and data, then put it into a report form to do some Power BI on it. This really helps people above me to view what we are doing, how we are doing it, and how to improve it.

Overall, it just makes your job simpler.

What is most valuable?

  • Ease of installation.
  • Ease of creating your databases.
  • Ease of changing what your databases look like when you need to.
  • Creating tables is simple.
  • They have lots of different options that you can use for the fields within the tables. 

It is a simple query language. It is consistent across all versions. If you start with an older version, move to the newer version. The same code will still work.

It can go easily on a virtual machine and be accommodated by a virtual machine easily. That is a plus, as not all databases can handle that. It also will do clustering, so you can have two database servers looking at the same data simultaneously. 

You can always access the data. You could have an offsite and an onsite, and if the onsite goes down, the offsite picks it up. I like that flexibility to provide continuing operations.

What needs improvement?

Right now, the tool you use to query the system updates every month. It pesters you to update the Client every month when there is nothing new that you really need to add, but it is constantly pestering you. I do not care for it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have no problems with stability at all, even when they are clustered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability depends on the version. I have to know ahead of time what version I need, but that is typical of all database software. However, as long as I build it correctly, it works great.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have not had support for the SQL Server product. 

This is Microsoft, so you just buy a ticket and they will just work with you until it is fixed. However, I have not had any issues where I needed to contact them.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used MySQL, because it is a free product. It was just hard to operate, do backups, and make automated. Also, it was not scalable.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is real simple. Just install it. Though, I recommend for new users to at least look online for training or a manual.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It has the easiest licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are a Microsoft shop, so we use Active Directory. That integrates well with this product, but we did look at Oracle. We also looked at IBM. This was the best price point for us for what we were getting.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Software Architect at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Provides data quality services tools and In-Memory OLTP tables.

What is most valuable?

SQL Server integration services tools

Data quality services tools

Master data services tools

SQL Server reporting services tools

Data partitioning (horizontal partitioning) tools

ColumnStore indexes

In-memory OLTP tables

How has it helped my organization?

We design and implement data warehouse solutions with SQL Server 2016 Developer Edition tools. This solution has:

Given us high levels of productivity

Allowed us to use an agile approach to the design and implementation of data warehouse solutions for our customers

Given us a competitive advantage in our market

What needs improvement?

We do not have much to complain about SQL Server 2016 Developer Edition in itself.

We do have some complaints regarding licensing. In an emerging market like Argentina, it is very steep for our customers to pay USD 28,000 or more on licensing for an instance of SQL Server 2016 Enterprise Edition. This poses a limiting factor to our growth.


For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using SQL Server 2016 Developer Edition for a few months so far. We have been using the previous version (SQL Server 2014 Developer Edition) for more than two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

We did not encounter any deployment issues.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We did not encounter any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not encounter any scalability issues. This is the case even though the Developers Edition does not offer the same level of performance and scalability that the equivalent Enterprise Edition offers.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

As usual, Microsoft offers very good customer service. The amount of resources (self-study materials, online courses, and tutorials) is huge and most of it is free. Paid customer service is also very good.

Technical Support:

Paid technical support is very good and efficient.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used data warehouse tools from Microsoft since SQL Server 2000.

How was the initial setup?

If you do the proper training prior to the setup, there will be no issues. However, the learning curve is wide and tall.

You could get started fast and sure if you stick to the many wizards included with the tools. However, the scope of those said wizards is limited.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented with an in-house team only, with proper, prior training that was also done in-house.

What was our ROI?

Since SQL Server 2014 Developer Edition, Microsoft has been offering these tools free of charge. The ROI is mainly focused around training investment. We do the training in-house, so the ROI is around one year.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We have no issues with pricing and licensing for SQL Server 2016 Developer Edition, as it is free of charge. The thorny issue is with pricing and licensing with customers.

We do our best to design data warehouse solutions that can cover requirements from our customers within the capabilities of SQL Server 2016 Standard Edition.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The cost-benefit ratio offered by Microsoft's data warehouse solutions is, by a long shot, much more convenient for our customers, small and medium sized companies, than solutions from other vendors.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is focused on companies that develop and offer data warehouse solutions for customers that use SQL Server. Consider the ROI, which is mostly training investment (for the Developer Edition). If training is not done in-house, only hire training from an official Microsoft training center in your region. Look for the best training center. Once you are done with the training, you can start taking customers for data warehouse projects.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user158343 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user158343Software Architect at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Top 20Real User

@KathyC, I really appreciate your thoughtful remarks on my review. Feedback is always welcome, as it helps all reviewers to focus on what is important to our peers.

Kind regards, GEN

See all 2 comments
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SQL Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Relational Databases Tools
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SQL Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.