LocalDB vs SQL Server comparison

LocalDB and SQL Server are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. LocalDB is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0, while SQL Server is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. LocalDB holds a 1.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to SQL Server’s 11.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LocalDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SQL Server users who would recommend it.

LocalDB

Read 6 LocalDB reviews

1,180 Views
1,180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SQL Server

Read 272 SQL Server reviews

13,600 Views
11,832 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LocalDB

SQL Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

SQL Server and LocalDB compete in the database management systems category. SQL Server seems to have the upper hand because of its extensive feature set, scalability, and enterprise-level capabilities.

Features: SQL Server offers dynamic resource allocation, Graphical Query Analyzer, and OLAP services. It also includes tools like Management Studio and SSIS for enhanced performance and memory management. LocalDB provides database engine compatibility, making it useful for developers who need a lightweight, streamlined solution.

Room for Improvement: SQL Server's installation may require additional resources, its complex pricing is a challenge for SMBs, and it lacks platform flexibility due to Windows dependency. LocalDB lacks advanced disaster recovery features, scalability, and direct cloud integration, limiting its suitability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQL Server can be deployed across various cloud environments and on-premises, offering flexibility for organizations. However, customer support experiences vary. LocalDB's deployment is mainly on-premises and is easy to manage, but it lacks the robust support structure that SQL Server provides.

Pricing and ROI: SQL Server offers versions from free to enterprise editions, with pricing based on core usage, which can be costly for larger deployments. It provides significant ROI due to its comprehensive features. LocalDB is cost-effective for personal or small business use, with a free license, though it lacks advanced features that may limit ROI for expanding businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed LocalDB vs. SQL Server Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LocalDB vs. SQL Server

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LocalDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SQL Server

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

272

Ranking in other categories

Database Management Systems (DBMS) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of LocalDB is 1.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQL Server is 11.8%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SQL Server	11.8%
LocalDB	1.5%
Other	86.7%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Srini-Dhanaraj

Founder & CEO at imfine.club

The database always has structured data, like rows, columns, and bases

LocalDB is an excellent solution for learners, beginners, and projects of negligible size; it is very good. Any startup can use a local database to start. Once they grow beyond its limits, they can migrate to a MS SQL server that's also available on-premises. I rate it ten out of ten.

Read full review

Peter Larsson

Data Warehouse Lead at Resurs Bank AB (publ.)

Ledger and seamless integrations have strengthened trusted analytics and unified workloads

SQL Server's high availability and disaster recovery features work for supporting mission-critical applications, but there is much more to wish for. These features are not quite ready yet, although they do function. However, they could be significantly better. High availability and disaster recovery features should be improved in the next releases. I have noticed that everything could be improved or enhanced in the future, particularly temporal tables and window functions. Sometimes, I believe Microsoft releases features to stay ahead of competitors, but they do not make them feature-rich or feature-complete. They release something to be ahead of leaders and then seem to forget to maintain and upgrade them. I want Microsoft to pay more attention and be more mindful about the things they implement. It is fine to do a first release that works, but you cannot simply abandon it in the following years without service packs and improvements. You must continue to build on features rather than forgetting about them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is fast."

"The initial setup was simple."

"LocalDB is an excellent solution for learners, beginners, and projects of negligible size; it is very good."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The guidelines are very easy to follow. Maintenance is very easy and requires very little manpower."

"The most valuable feature of LocalDBis the connection between the application and DB."

"It is a typical database solution, and it is working well so far. It is easy to use, and it is also very common and popular, which makes it easy to find a support partner."

"I like the availability group functionality. We are setting up more clusters using availability groups. The enterprise licensing or Software Assurance makes it a little bit cheaper as well. It is nice to have that read-only copy for reporting and everything else."

"SQL Server, a widely adopted database management system, is utilized across numerous sectors. Initially competing with Oracle and Db2, SQL Server has gained popularity. It serves as the backend database for a variety of applications."

"The most valuable features are programmability and reliability."

"SQL Server, with its enterprise features, offers low cost in comparison to Oracle, while PostgreSQL, though an emerging technology, is not an enterprise-level solution and has flaws, making SQL Server the most cost-effective with good human resource availability to manage it."

"can extract data from the server and store it in a local data source for BI purposes."

"I have seen that this is a very stable product."

"Most valuable features include: high availability, clustering, save backup and recovery."

More SQL Server pros

Cons

"The internal connection features of LocalDB could improve."

"The solution needs to create a management tool. Right now, the solution has tools for creating a local installation, but it's too simplistic. We need something that's a bit more complex so that we can extend the tools with our scripts."

"The ALM features can be improved, but the database by itself is reliable."

"The initial setup is complex and requires a skilled person."

"It is only for a small amount of data. Local DB is made for the purpose of small-volume optics."

"An area for improvement would be the SQL Server process monitoring, which is quite basic and could sustain more information."

"I would like the SQL Server to be able to provide cloud support. We use the solution with a Korean provider supporting only MySQL rather than Microsoft SQL Server, which would be preferable and cheaper. This would prevent us from having to pay for troubleshooting and hosting the server."

"Sometimes the system hangs. Its databases should be able to deal with more data in a faster way. Its speed of processing larger amounts of information should be improved."

"You do need to have technical knowledge in order to install the solution. It's not something a layperson can do."

"SQL Server could be improved with cheaper licensing because it's very expensive."

"The price could be better. It costs a lot, and competing databases like Postgres are free."

"The pricing and quality of the product could be improved."

"CAL licenses should cost less. Microsoft usually prices high for client access licenses. Server plus user client access license (CAL) licensing requires a separate Server license for each server on which the software is installed, plus a user CAL for each user accessing the server."

More SQL Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The fees are fair."

"The licensing cost is too high for LocalDB."

"Licensing fees increase depending on size and performance. If you want higher performance, you should go for a different course."

"The price of SQL Server is great. In my company, SQL Server is part of the Microsoft Suite, we don't have to pay for any additional license costs, it's quite cost-effective for us."

"Cost is a major derivative for any organization. It has a reasonable cost value, and its cloud support is also better than others. Comparatively, Oracle can do the same things or is even better in certain areas, but it is expensive. The cost along with the support are the plus factors for SQL Server."

"The price of SQL Server could be better in the African market. The licensing model needs to be improved, it is confusing."

"For licensing, we pay yearly. The licensing is very expensive, and it should be cheaper."

"My advice is quite straightforward. If you know the number of users who really and truly need access to the Server then it is a no-brainer. If you do not know, then get the basic package and minimum licenses and start from there. Needless to say, users can develop/use data structures outside and then deploy onto the Server."

"It is something we have been using for a lot of years. If we're paying, it should be reasonable."

"This solution is available at a much lower price point than Oracle."

More SQL Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

38%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	119
Midsize Enterprise	59
Large Enterprise	115

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LocalDB?

It's free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LocalDB?

Technically speaking, you don't need to get any updates because it's not online. It's on-premise. So once it is installed, then you get a desktop-grade version. But the purpose of LocalDB is not th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LocalDB?

There were multiple systems, some planned, like the mainframe, the gold database, a website, and a manual Excel spreadsheet. These were the various data sources, and we wanted to bring everything i...

See all answers

Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?

SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...

See all answers

Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?

SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...

See all answers

Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?

My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...

See all answers

Comparisons

MySQL vs LocalDB

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Database vs LocalDB

Compared 13% of the time

MariaDB vs LocalDB

Compared 9% of the time

Infobright DB vs LocalDB

Compared 7% of the time

WizeHive Zengine vs LocalDB

Compared 6% of the time

More LocalDB Competitors

IBM Db2 Database vs SQL Server

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database vs SQL Server

Compared 11% of the time

SAP HANA vs SQL Server

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs SQL Server

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Informix vs SQL Server

Compared 3% of the time

More SQL Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

January 2026

Download LocalDB product report

Buyer's Guide

SQL Server

January 2026

Download SQL Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL

Overview

LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.

Microsoft

SQL Server is a relational database management system (RDBMS) by Microsoft. The product's main purposes are to store data and retrieve it as requested by other software applications - on the same computer or on another computer across a shared network. The solution is built on top of Structured Query Language (SQL), which is a standardized programming language used for relational database management.

The product is tied to Transact-SQL (T-SQL), which is an implementation of SQL from Microsoft that adds several proprietary programming extensions to the standard language. SQL Server is built similarly to other RDBMS products, as its structure is a row-based table that connects related data elements in different tables to one another. One of its most important components is the SQL Server Database Engine, as it controls data processing, storage, and security. Beneath the Database Engine is the SQL Server Operating System, which is used for memory and I/O management, locking data to avoid unneeded upgrades, and job scheduling.

The solution has four editions with different sets of services and tools. They include:

SQL Server Developer
SQL Server Expression
SQL Server Standard
SQL Server Enterprise

The first two are available for free and are typically utilized by smaller companies, as they work with fewer functions and storage. The second two editions are generally used by bigger organizations and enterprises and offer more features.

The solution has several functions through which users can facilitate different data-related processes. These include:

Aggregate functions: These functions are used to calculate one or more values and return a single value.
Window functions: Window functions calculate an aggregate value based on a group of rows and return multiple rows for each involved group.
Date functions: These functions allow clients to handle data and time data efficiently.
String functions: Through the string functions, SQL Server processes an input string and returns a string or numeric value.
System functions: The system functions of the product return objects, values, and settings.

SQL Server Services

SQL Server has a wide range of add-on services that provide additional benefits beyond database management. These services include:

Machine learning: SQL Server machine learning services allow users to do machine learning and data analytics within the product.
Service broker: This feature is a part of the database engine and offers messaging and message queuing for applications on the platform.
Replication: This feature consists of transaction replication, merge replication, and snapshot replication.
Analysis: SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) adds online analytical processing (OLAP) and data mining capabilities to SQL Server databases.
Reporting: This feature supports the development of custom reporting applications.
Notifications: This feature generates data-driven notifications which are sent to subscribers of Notification Services.
Integration: This SQL Server feature provides capabilities for data integration, data import, and data warehousing.
Full-text search: Through this feature, users can utilize specialized indexing and query for unstructured text stored in the solution.
Visual studio: This feature supports data programming with SQL Server.
Azure Data Studio: This is a cross-platform query editor that can be downloaded and used alongside SQL Server.

SQL Server Benefits

The solution has many benefits for users. These include the following:

The platform ensures a consistent experience across other platforms while being fast and agile.
Through the built-in intelligence features, users can understand their data better.
The solution has enterprise-level security, which ensures the smooth and safe performance of users' data.
SQL Server offers the ability to retrieve large amounts of data quickly and efficiently.
The product installation process is fairly easy, and it offers a user-friendly interface.
SQL Server offers improved data storage and retrieval functions through frequent upgrades.
The solution reduces the risk of database server attacks, since it is not an open-source database.

Reviews from Real Users

A president at a consultancy evaluates SQL Server as a veteran solution with critical log shipping feature.

Harkamal S., a user at a manufacturing company, rates SQL Server with a high mark because it is a stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

AstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero

Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.

Buyer's Guide

LocalDB vs. SQL Server

February 2026

Free Report: LocalDB vs. SQL Server

Find out what your peers are saying about LocalDB vs. SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LocalDB vs. SQL Server report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.