It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.
SQL Server and SAP HANA are powerful database management systems. SAP HANA seems to have the upper hand in speed and real-time analytics, whereas SQL Server shines in integration with Microsoft's ecosystem and user-friendly management.
Features: SQL Server offers seamless integration with Microsoft tools, strong security measures, and user-friendly management. SAP HANA provides real-time analytics, high processing speed, and in-memory computing capabilities.
Room for Improvement: SQL...
It really depends on the purpose of usage. Both have strengths and limitations. SAP HANA is expensive especially when you try to integrate data from other sources than SAP systems. SQL Server (I believed you refer to MSSQL), is good for you to store application data. However, if you need big data analysis or advanced analytics, SQL Server may not be the best solution. The same goes for SAP HANA.