Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user540237 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Executive at System Business, s. r. o.
Vendor
Some of the valuable features are flexible report scheduling and common JRXML templates for parameterized reporting.

What is most valuable?

  • PostgreSQL support
  • Saving reports in PDF, XLS(X), HTML formats
  • The automatic sending of reports by e-mail (The HTML report can be shown inline, not just via an attachment.)
  • Flexible report scheduling
  • Common JRXML templates for parameterized reporting
  • The possibility to export reports to the file system
  • The user-friendly interface
  • Scriptable reports with the use of variables, parameters, and fields

How has it helped my organization?

  • Business processes automation
  • Provides higher efficiency
  • Minimizes human error

What needs improvement?

The following aspects need to improve:

  • The possibility to display all report schedules in one place
  • The out-of-the box possibility to integrate with independent installation of PostgreSQL for the JasperReports server
  • Better process control (such as start, stop, restart without failures between various components, etc.)
  • A more straightforward/user-friendly migration of reports between various versions of the JasperReports server

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution for around four years.

Buyer's Guide
TIBCO Jaspersoft
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO Jaspersoft. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were rarely any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not experience any scalability issues as of yet.

How are customer service and support?

It is a good forum.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were not using any other solution. We were doing things more manually. Jaspersoft was our first try.

How was the initial setup?

The setup was average. Some special features were hard to figure out and configure, such as the Slovak local reports.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We are happy with the free, open source version.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

In 2012, there were some other options that we looked into, but just theoretically.

What other advice do I have?

The migration between versions could be hard. It is okay to have multi-version environments, but just be aware of it.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
BI developer - (Jaspersoft/Pentaho/Pentaho C-Tools/Kettle/Talend/Data warehouse) at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
It includes enterprise features such as ad-hoc reporting on self service BI, rich dashboards, rich embedded BI solutions, mobile BI solutions, multi-tenant features, and rich HTML-5 visualizations.

Valuable Features:

Some specific features that I like are -

  • Multi-tenancy
  • Self Service BI using domains, ad-hoc views, ad-hoc reports.
  • High Charts (HTML-5) and D3 (Data Driven Document) charts.
  • Big Data support - Hadoop Hive and MongoDB and etc. 
  • Report Books feature - Table of Contents.

Improvements to My Organization:

This product is integrated into a CA product called CA PPM (Project Portfolio Management) for its reporting purpose. Using Jaspersoft's data warehouse capabilities, CA PPM is able to provide faster performance by utilizing this tool when compared to its previous reporting solution SAP Business Objects.

Room for Improvement:

  • Full support of new visualizations D3, and C3.
  • Drag and drop desktop tool for analysis such as that in Tableau, QlikView or Spotfire desktop. This could be a part of Jasper Design Studio. 
  • Send the report to email with its output as an attachment within the studio.
  • User defined plug-in development and deployment like Pentaho Analytics i.e. a market place feature for server or studio.

Deployment Issues:

We have had no issues with the deployment.

Stability Issues:

There have been no performance issues.

Scalability Issues:

It's been able to scale for our needs.

Cost and Licensing Advice:

It's open source which means that small to mid-sized businesses can use the community version of Jaspersoft and save lot of money. For Enterprise level companies, it has rich enterprise features such as ad-hoc reporting on self service BI, rich dashboards, rich embedded BI solutions, mobile BI solutions, multi-tenant features, and rich HTML-5 visualizations. These help a client take better and more elegant decisions for a lower cost per candidate per year. Also, you can rent the server for quick solutions in the cloud at a rate of $1 per hour.

Other Advice:

If a business is small to mid-size you should get the community version. Otherwise, if your business is huge, you should look at the Enterprise, Professional, or Cloud versions of the software for a lower price.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO Jaspersoft
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about TIBCO Jaspersoft. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Co-Founder at Helical IT Solution (Jaspersoft, Pentaho, Talend, Kettle, DWBI, ETL, Ctools, iReport, Jasper Report)
Consultant
Jaspersoft vs. Pentaho – Which one to use & is there any need to purchase the commercial edition

Any company (be it technology, manfucaturing, human resource, ecommerce, SME etc) always has the need for Business Intelligence to some or the other extent. If cost is one of the consideration factor, then the 2 BI tools which are at the forefront are Pentaho and Jaspersoft. But, often the same companies are caught up in an imbrogilo as to which tool to use, what are the technology/and end business user wise differences/ do i actually need to purchase commercial edition, is there any work around etc.

Differences :- In the below mentioned points, I have tried to cover functionality wise the differences

a. Reports :- Jaspersoft is known for its picture pixel perfect reporting. Jasper uses ireport for designing the reports. Hence, for having reports, Jaspersoft is the most ideal candidate. Pentaho uses Pentaho Report Designer.

b. Dashboards :- Pentaho provides much more capabililties, interactivity in terms of dashboards. Dashboards designed in Pentaho are far more superior in functionality, aesthetically as compared to Jaspersoft. Pentaho CE uses CDE/CDF, Pentaho EE uses PDD . Dashboard functionality is present only in the Enterprise edition of Jaspersoft.

c. Pentaho is having an intermediate layer known as Xactions & hence providing much more flexibility in terms of plugin designing, integration with applications, having out of box experience etc. Xactions supports scripting and scheduling of scripts execution. Jaspersoft dosent provide that much of flexibility in terms of intermediate layer, but never-the-less, Jasper server by default comes with some functionalities like scheduling, for plugin desiging they rely on ireport plugins and Jasper server plugins,

e. Mobile BI compatibility :- Jaspersoft scores higher than Pentaho here. They have BI for iOS, Android platforms. Functionality wise and user interface wise Jaspersoft mobile BI is better. They even have an opensouce Apple iphone application. Pentaho users have to often rely on third party tools to enhance mobile BI experience. But, Jasper provides native mobile API hence helping developers to create mobile applications. Pentaho mobile BI is only present in the enterprise edition.

f. Documentation : Jaspersoft invests a lot of time in documentation. Its pretty evident from that fact that they are having different case studies of the different clients on their website, explaining how Jaspersoft has helped them.

g. ETL : Jaspersoft uses Talend and Pentaho uses Pentaho Data Integrator (Kettle) as their default ETL tools. Kettle is developed by Pentaho organization itself unlike the case of Jaspersoft which uses Talend Open Studio version with some functionalities missing.

h. OLAP Analysis : Both Jaspersoft and Pentaho uses Pentaho Mondrian engine in their BI suite, and it goes unsaid which one will be stronger in this case.

i. Community support : Community support is more in Jaspersoft as compared to Pentaho. Also, the community members are more active of Jaspersoft community, hence if you are using CE, the chances of problem resolution is much more.

j. Plugin : Pentaho is having many plugin which are ready to use like CDE, CDF, Saiku etc. Pentaho is having a highly active community for plugin designing. Pentaho server by default comes with marketplace (just like appstore). Jaspersoft is a late entrant in this field and is currently having very limited plugins till now. They have also started Jasperexchange for their plugins.

k. Data Mining : Pentaho is having data mining module named Weka and Jaspesoft uses R. Again Weka is developed by Pentaho itself unlike the case with R. But toolwise, R is more advanced and more capable as compared to Weka

l. Big Data : Both Jaspersoft and Pentaho provides big data integration services.

m. Unlike Jaspesoft, Pentaho provides a much more tightly integrated BI suite since it has itself developed most of the components.

n. Jaspersoft EE has fusionchart integration. The latest version of Jaspesoft 5.0 EE is having Highcharts integration with it. Pentaho has open flashcharts integration. For geographical charting, Jaspersoft is having mapbox pro whereas Pentaho is having google maps.

o. Summarizing Jasper has a heavy focus on reporting and analysis. It has a better web 2.0 user interface than Pentaho and is generally easier to use. It benefits from better marketing, informational web sites, and documentation. Overall, it makes researching and finding what users need easier than Pentaho. Whereas Pentaho focuses on data integration, ETL, and workflow automation. It has a user interface that is more difficult for business users than is Jasper’s. The documentation is also less robust than its competition. On the other hand, it has strong data mining tools, ETL, flexibility via Xactions.

Which BI tools is to be used, whether enterprise edition has to be purchased or is there any other way out (like best of breed solution of different BI suites, plugin development, data visulization charting engines integration etc) – all these things can only be ascertained by a thorough discussion between the company and the solution provider. Its generally ideal to go and have a consultation with a company having exp in different BI technologies which will be able to give a comprehensive picture and can help the client towards business objective, rather than trying to push their software.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user326337 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user326337Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot
Consultant

Pablo, which BI Solution do you use?

See all 2 comments
it_user542799 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
​The reporting and charting features are valuable. Implementation of subreports is not straightforward enough.

What is most valuable?

  • The reporting and charting features: I have worked with other reporting tools and I find this tool is easier and faster to work with while creating charts.
  • Easy editing options.

How has it helped my organization?

I have used this technology to implement a reporting module for my client. This tool has helped my client to track the data more easily.

What needs improvement?

Implementing of subreports is such a pain. This functionality could be made faster.

The concept of subreports is to easily embed an existing report in a new report. This may sound simple but implementing it is such a pain. It took me hours to get it right. It is just not straightforward enough.

while I add a report, I just drag drop the icon and establish a connection with the database and it is ready. But sub report is not the case. It should have been just a drag drop and it should act as an individual report on its own only. It takes a long time to give some connections and there is no much documentation available on the same either.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution for about a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I did not encounter any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not encounter any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

On a scale of 1-5, I would rate it a 2 because the technical team never had any proper documentation or guidance for any of my issues. No online help is available either.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use anything else.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It would be good to go with Jaspersoft Studio.

What other advice do I have?

Write down the project requirements and compare it with all that this product can do. Then, decide wisely based on all the options available.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
BI/ML Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Has helped our organization by fulfilling our security needs, but the self-service reporting could be better
Pros and Cons
  • "We find the access restrictions on different user groups valuable."
  • "A better focus should be put on self-service reporting."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to research revenue management and billing reports across subject area reports related to billing. We deploy the solution on a private version of AWS cloud.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution has improved our organization by fulfilling our needs related to security.

What is most valuable?

We find the access restrictions on different user groups valuable. Additionally, the reports are quite easy to pay for, so getting users aligned on reporting is valuable.

What needs improvement?

We have experienced session issues with the session management and the user running a report. So the user's environments can be improved, and a better focus should be put on self-service reporting. So a self-service module could help TIBCO go to the next level.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. It wasn't bad when it came to performance, so there wasn't much lag between the database and the report.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. There are approximately two users using the solution in our organization. We haven't pushed it to the limit with this solution, but I think it's capable of handling good traffic and volume of data. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

We haven't had contact with Jaspersoft customer service and support, but we have connected with the AWS team.

How was the initial setup?

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, and it has its required ramp-up.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution in-house with a team of three developers.

What was our ROI?

There is a return on investment because it saves effort when you have reports scheduled as it gives users direct access to database exports.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is neutral because the cost is justified with the level of reporting required. I rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including self-service reporting. I recommend the solution to users considering implementing it. There are features in the tool that make it easier to create the templates, and those templates can be reused.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Assistant Manager at Allianz Malaysia
Real User
Easy to use with helpful drag and drop capability, but data cleansing features need to be added
Pros and Cons
  • "The feature that I like most is the drag and drop capability."
  • "I would like to see better support for big data."

What is our primary use case?

We use Jaspersoft for applications related to financial loans.

What is most valuable?

The feature that I like most is the drag and drop capability.

What needs improvement?

The data validation and cleansing functionality need to be improved.

I would like to see better support for big data.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Jaspersoft for between three and four years.

How are customer service and technical support?

We rely on our vendor for technical support and have not been in contact with TIBCO.

How was the initial setup?

Our deployment took between two and three months to complete.

What about the implementation team?

The product was installed by the vendor.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Support is recommended because of the price.

What other advice do I have?

This is a good product and I recommend it. My main complaint is related to data validation and cleansing.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user539580 - PeerSpot reviewer
Risk and Operations Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
you can continue working in the tool, while the job that generates reports runs in the background.

What is most valuable?

The reports and analytic view feature and the ability to generate large reports in background are most valuable to us. The feature that allows to run different reports in the background helps to create long running reports without affecting the system performance, i.e., you can continue working in the Jaspersoft tool, while the job that generates reports runs in the background.

How has it helped my organization?

It helps to process very quickly and present it in a very understandable way for the business people.

What needs improvement?

I would definitely recommend to evaluate this product in the context of other business intelligence tools that are currently on the market.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were no stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not encounter any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

This product is being supported by our local help desk.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have any other solutions before.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

All this is being handled by our IT department.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

It was chosen on a group level.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Sr. Business Intelligence Developer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Report locales provide multi-language support. It should have a report bursting option.

What is most valuable?

  • Profile attributes for implementing multi-tenancy.
  • Report locales for implementation of multi-language support in report development.
  • Subreports, in many reports, to achieve specific report requirements.

How has it helped my organization?

We are using Jaspersoft for report development.

What needs improvement?

There is scope of improvement in terms of:

  • More flexibility for report / dashboards development.
  • A report bursting option.
  • Caching of query input controls that creates problem.
    (In regards to input controls which are based on SQL queries, they show cached data instead of fetching new data every time reports are executed. Input controls still show old data, even if there is a change in data and consequent query results.)
  • Scriptlet execution option before the main data set execution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this product for about three and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not encountered any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

I would give the technical support an 8/10 rating.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to Jasperserver, we did use a different solution and decided to switch due to higher licensing costs.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward in terms of server installation, implementing multi-tenancy, multi-language, locales etc.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated another option, namely Cognos, before choosing this product.

What other advice do I have?

It is a good, simple to learn product with some limitations.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free TIBCO Jaspersoft Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Product Categories
Reporting Embedded BI
Buyer's Guide
Download our free TIBCO Jaspersoft Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.