Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
David Jellison - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director, Quality Engineering at Everbridge
Real User
Easy issue tracking and high visibility
Pros and Cons
  • "Veracode's technical support is great. They assigned us a TAM and once a week, we have a brief engagement with the TAM to verify that everything's going well. If we have any outstanding issues, they get serviced and addressed."
  • "I think if they could improve the operations around accepted vulnerabilities, we would see improvements in our productivity."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Veracode is SAST and SCA in our SDLC pipelines. We also use it for DAST on a periodic basis and time-based scans on our staging system. We use the trading modules for certifying all our developers annually.

In addition, we use Veracode to scan within our build's pipeline. We do use Greenlight, which is their IDE solution for prevention of issues of vulnerabilities.

We are FedRAMP certified as a company, so we use this as part of our certification process for Veracode ISO 27001 and various other certifications we have.

How has it helped my organization?

There is a tight integration of Veracode with JIRA. We use JIRA for nearly all of our issue tracking.

This integration provides a way to link all of the vulnerabilities discovered to our backlogs and active scrum queues, so that there's high visibility within teams for any of the issues that are related to their teams.

What is most valuable?

I think the most valuable to us is the policy management, which enables us to create different kinds of policies for different kinds of applications. Veracode policy management also allows us to plan for, track against, and report on our compliance with those different policies.

What needs improvement?

I think the biggest room for improvement is around known or accepted vulnerabilities that, when we re-scan, we want those things to be recognized as already accepted, as an exception. Sometimes they show up as something new and we have to go back and re-accept that as an accepted exception in order to bring our numbers back into compliance. I think if they could improve the operations around accepted vulnerabilities, we would see improvements in our productivity.

I would also like to see more executive reporting. Having a good snapshot of how well we're tracking, where each of the teams that own the applications, how they're doing, and where their gaps are would be good. Currently, the reporting is geared towards tracking current vulnerabilities. Even though they have trending, the trending doesn't necessarily evaluate the teams and how well they're doing. I would also like to be more oriented towards teams.

Overall, I would give Veracode a nine out of 10.

Buyer's Guide
Veracode
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Veracode. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

The company's been using Veracode for five years. I've been using it for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Veracode is stable in my opinion. We've had very little interruption that was unplanned.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not run into an issue with scalability yet. Veracode was built based on application counts and not users, which is what a lot of the competitors do.

We have some 300 people using Veracode. Some are executives while others are engineers actively working in Veracode. 

How are customer service and support?

Veracode's technical support is great. They assigned us a TAM and once a week, we have a brief engagement with the TAM to verify that everything's going well. If we have any outstanding issues, they get serviced and addressed.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used Veracode the entire time I have been with this organization. However, I know that they used Coverity and WhiteSource prior to switching to Veracode. The main reason my organization chose Veracode is its comprehensive dashboard. 

How was the initial setup?

Our deployment took a while so I would say the initial setup was moderately complicated. We gradually moved into the pattern we are in today and displaced some other vendors along the way. So it was a slow ramp for us because of our business needs.

We were up and running and operational within a couple of months. And then, over time, we broadened our footprint with Veracode.

What about the implementation team?

We deployed Veracode in-house. 

What was our ROI?

Our biggest return on investment is maintaining certifications that enable us to attract customers of larger scale and government-sensitive customers.

Going back to the cost structure, I think that the way Veracode is priced and their comparison to third parties, I still put them at four out of five.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Veracode recently introduced some pricing based on microservices. This model gives us a lot of flexibility in being able to add and remove microservices and scale them that way.

The pricing is solid. I think with the current consolidated pricing that we have is pretty consistent every year.

What other advice do I have?

All of the Veracode applications operate as one platform. Most of the competitors out there separate their products from their reporting and configuration, so you don't get a single pane of glass. With Veracode, you get a single pane of glass and reporting that you can combine with the different scan types to look at compliance.

The advice I would give regarding this solution is this: Look at the policies, the dashboards, and integration with ALM applications like Veracode and JIRA. They have a tighter integration there that I see with most of the competitors.

I'm sure that the scan quality is consistent. Perhaps there's some applications that are a little better than others at detection. But we find that Veracode is very comparative to other things you solutions the quality of catching vulnerabilities.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Muhammed Shabreen - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at RIZEK
Real User
Top 20
Does good analysis and increases our security level, but needs to be improved from the usability and pricing perspective
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a good product for creating secure software. The static code analysis is pretty good and useful."
  • "From the usability perspective, it is not up to date with the latest trends. It looks very old. Tools such as Datadog, New Relic, or infrastructure security tools, such as AWS Cloud, seem very user-friendly. They are completely web-based, and you can navigate through them pretty quickly, whereas Veracode is very rigid. It is like an old-school enterprise application. It does the job, but they need to invest a little more on the usability front."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for code analysis to see if there are any vulnerabilities in the code. I'm heading a startup for this, and I have a development team of about 14 people. They upload the codebase to Veracode, run an analysis, and take the results. If there are any vulnerabilities, they fix them.

How has it helped my organization?

It reduces security vulnerabilities and increases our security level. It has been helpful in reducing our security debt.

Having a centralized view for our developers and security professionals is very important. If there is anything in the cloud or infrastructure, we need to know proactively. Otherwise, we wouldn't know when there is a security compromise. So, we have to be prepared so that if something happens, we know where to go and stop it. It is not always about fixing and making your code zero percent vulnerable. That doesn't happen generally, but you need to know the areas where something can go wrong. If those areas are your critical systems or critical data security parts, you can act accordingly and quickly.

The centralized view has improved the visibility into the status of our application code. This visibility is very important because we need to know the condition or status of our codebase.

Scanning with the solution has increased our fix rate, but I don't have the metrics. It has also helped to increase the productivity of our security and development teams.

What is most valuable?

It is a good product for creating secure software. The static code analysis is pretty good and useful. The mitigation recommendations provided by the scanning engine are also pretty good.

What needs improvement?

From the usability perspective, it is not up to date with the latest trends. It looks very old. Tools such as Datadog, New Relic, or infrastructure security tools, such as AWS Cloud, seem very user-friendly. They are completely web-based, and you can navigate through them pretty quickly, whereas Veracode is very rigid. It is like an old-school enterprise application. It does the job, but they need to invest a little more on the usability front.

From the pricing perspective, it is not very convenient for startup organizations. They should have options to onboard it for the startup ecosystem quickly and affordably.

There should also be strengthening of the developer community.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for almost a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I didn't find any errors. It is available and stable. I didn't have any issues with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Its flexibility is very less. It is a very rigid application. Currently, we have six users of this solution in our organization.

How are customer service and support?

I interacted with them once. They were very good. They were very friendly and supportive. I would rate them a seven out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn't use a different solution previously. The company started just a year ago. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

For enterprises, Veracode has done a fairly good job, but its pricing is not suitable for startups. The microservice distributed architecture for a startup is very small. I had to do a lot of discussions on the pricing initially. I previously worked in an enterprise organization where I used Veracode, and that's how I got to know about Veracode, but that was a big organization with more than a thousand employees. So, the cost is very different for them because the size of the application is different. Its pricing makes sense there, but when we try to onboard this solution for the startup ecosystem, pricing is not friendly. Because I knew the product and I knew its value, I onboarded it, but I don't think any other startup at our scale will onboard it. 

Its pricing should be based on the size of the application or organization. For a startup organization, they can provide credit-based pricing. They don't need to reduce the price. AWS, Google, and other vendors do the same where they don't reduce the price, but they give credits. I have been in the industry for 15 years, and I have seen that people don't like to change technologies for many reasons. For the first year or the first 18 months, customers can explore the product completely free. If the first year is free and you are onboarded, you would stay with it if it does the job. If the product is doing its job and adding security value, there is no reason to change it in the second year, and you are also ready to pay because, in the first year, you have tested that it is working fine. A company that has used it for the first year would definitely need it in the second year because they keep adding code to the codebase. Another option is that, like Cloudflare, they provide a very slashed rate. Cloudflare onboards everyone at a very cheap price, but when you start exploring the actual use cases, they start adding. 

What other advice do I have?

It is a good product, and you should consider it, but it can be elevated more for startup culture. It should be more pricing-friendly and user-friendly. There should also be strengthening of the developer community.

We are only doing code analysis with it. For manual penetration testing, we have to contact an entity.

It hasn't reduced our scan time. It also hasn't helped our organization with certification and audits. We're a small startup, and at this time, we don't have audits, etc. We might do that later. 

I would rate this product a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Veracode
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Veracode. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Systems Engineer at Shiftmovers
Real User
Top 5
By continuously scanning our applications, we can mitigate risks that may arise in some workflows
Pros and Cons
  • "Veracode's most valuable aspect is continuous integration. It helps us integrate with other applications so that it can monitor the security process."
  • "Veracode is a little costly. It's cost-effective for a large enterprise, but it may be too expensive for small businesses."

What is our primary use case?

Veracode helps scan applications for security purposes to ensure they are safe before deployment. The solution is continuously monitoring the security of our infrastructure and workflows. About five people use the solution across our organization. 

How has it helped my organization?

Our security posture has improved since we implemented Veracode because our developers have a better understanding of the security risks that may arise due to some actions we take on various projects and tasks. We're more aware of how vulnerabilities can be introduced into our daily work. 

Veracode has reduced the amount we spend to remedy security risks by about 60 percent. Security testing is much easier than before. The time needed to address vulnerabilities can affect the workflows and lead to late delivery of our services across customers. It has helped us to mitigate risks by effectively monitoring workflows. The conditional scanning procedures we previously used have been replaced by modern systematic algorithms.

Veracode saves time and costs because it's flexible in terms of an organization's data requirements. It can provide data intelligence from various work platforms and guidance on the best practices for security mitigation so we can safeguard our data in various work processes.

The solution enables us to establish a strategic policy management infrastructure to monitor the performance of each application periodically and report on the security performance. The dynamic analysis gives us feedback from time to time and performance metrics inside the program interface. 

This platform is one of the most efficient and effective tools for upgrading applications to meet an organization's performance standards and policies. It helps us improve our development because sometimes the coding procedure might not reflect the latest threats. 

What is most valuable?

Veracode's most valuable aspect is continuous integration. It helps us integrate with other applications so that it can monitor the security process. By continuously scanning our applications, we can mitigate risks that may arise in some workflows. It streamlines compliance, policy management, and reporting on various data analytics. We use it daily to gain insight into our work processes.

The solution is built into our SecOps program. It offers modern policy management, essential support, and analytics features. It's efficient with fast and powerful risk-mitigation tools.

What needs improvement?

I think Veracode could integrate some advanced technologies to better address new threats as they arise. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used Veracode for about a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Veracode has been a stable product. We've had some downtime, but it has performed well overall. 

How are customer service and support?

I rate Veracode support a nine out of ten. Veracode's support team has always been helpful. When we contact them by phone or online chat, they respond quickly with a solution within the time frame established in our support contract.  

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

Deploying Veracode was straightforward, and we had help from the vendor's support team. Our deployment team has six members, and the whole process took about three weeks. 

After deployment, the product requires some maintenance. We sometimes face some networking challenges that require repairs, and we need to periodically update some tools.

What was our ROI?

Veracode is a good investment, and I can recommend it to anyone who is looking for the best security tester. I estimate that we saw a 60 percent ROI this year, and it continues.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Veracode is a little costly. It's cost-effective for a large enterprise, but it may be too expensive for small businesses. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate Veracode an eight out of ten. I would recommend it to others who need to do testing for application performance or security and risk management. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Shobana Raghu - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Development Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Showed us where errors were and helped us track their status, but reporting could have been more detailed
Pros and Cons
  • "I liked that I could easily find out where my errors were. Instead of going through the whole code and the scripts, it showed me where the errors were and gave me an idea of how to fix them."
  • "The reporting was detailed, but there were some things that were missing. It showed us on which line an error was found, but it could have been more detailed."

What is our primary use case?

We used it for static and dynamic testing to check if there were any vulnerabilities in the code. If there were any vulnerabilities, we would check the report downloaded from the Veracode portal and try to fix the code before deploying it.

How has it helped my organization?

Veracode helped me remove errors, and it didn't take a long time to fix any issue because I had an answer regarding where the code needed to be fixed. That feature helped us test our cases and get them deployed. It helped me fix vulnerabilities and any other errors before deployment to the applications.

The SAST and DAST scans—we used it both before code was deployed and after it was deployed—helped us run through the issues and keep track of their status. It was deployed in the pipelines, through Jenkins, and checked the logs in Kubernetes.

The solution also saved us time. I really liked the automatic scanning because there was no way to know where an issue was. Human tendency is to make mistakes, but Veracode helped us find the exact spot where an error was and change it. The reporting helped us do that in a short amount of time.

For our team, it had a very good impact. My manager used to suggest that before taking code to the next level, it was a really good idea to scan it.

What is most valuable?

I liked that I could easily find out where my errors were. Instead of going through the whole code and the scripts, it showed me where the errors were and gave me an idea of how to fix them.

What needs improvement?

The reporting was detailed, but there were some things that were missing. It showed us on which line an error was found, but it could have been more detailed.

Also, with upgrades, we had quite a difficult time tracking the reports, so there was some maintenance around that.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used Veracode for 13 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I had a situation that was due to a slow network, and I couldn't get results within a specific time. Because of that, there was a lag in production; we couldn't deploy the code on time. There was a crash, and because of that, we couldn't meet our production deadline.

The downtime happened two or three times. I thought it was due to a network issue when it happened once, but then I came to understand that it was a maintenance issue.

What other advice do I have?

Veracode is really not difficult or complex to understand. The whole concept is simple. It takes some time to get used to the tool, but it is a very simple tool to work with.

It was quite fast. Scanning my code took 25 to 30 minutes, which was quite good.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Vladimir Shilov - PeerSpot reviewer
DevSecOps at Ciklum ApS
MSP
Top 5Leaderboard
With extensive reporting capabilities and a user-friendly interface, the tool is also highly scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface."
  • "There are certain shortcomings in Veracode's static analysis engine. I would improve Veracode's static analysis engine to make it capable of identifying vulnerabilities with low false positives."

What is our primary use case?

I have helped other companies implement Veracode Static Analysis in their IT environment. In our company, we need to scan many .NET applications using Veracode, and we could scan our software since it is a SaaS solution, after which we process the reports to improve the product.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface.

What needs improvement?

There are certain shortcomings in Veracode's static analysis engine. I would improve Veracode's static analysis engine to make it capable of identifying vulnerabilities with low false positives.

The product is good, and if improvements are required, then such improvements should not be significant enough. There may be a slight scope to improve the product's integration capabilities. The product can also consider improving its support of different .NET versions and other programming languages, like Java.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Veracode Static Analysis for three or four months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Our company faced some issues with the tool, but the support team solved these issues quite quickly. The stability of the tool is high. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution. We can implement the tool in different DevOps environments and projects, because of which we can create groups of applications and apply different policies to application groups, making it an enterprise-level tool. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support helped us solve different problems related to Veracode, including some of its use cases. Veracode's support helped our company get around a problem and how to set up the scan rules correctly when we had some unexpected errors during the scanning process. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have experience with Snyk. I used Snyk a year ago. Snyk doesn't support the version of the .NET applications we use in our company, so we decided to move to Veracode.

What about the implementation team?

The initial setup was easy since it is a SaaS solution and a well-documented product at the same time. In our company, we don't need to spin up a server to install something since we simply use the web interface and integrate the web interface with the DevOps environment.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is a hard setup and ten is an easy setup, I rate the initial setup phase an eight or nine.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. In our company, we use Microsoft Azure DevOps for our environment, but I don't know the environment in which Veracode gets used in our company. Veracode offers a web interface and API, so I don't know their cloud solutions.

The deployment is quite fast, but its overall quickness in terms of deployment depends on the number of applications you want to scan. If you want to scan one application, the deployment can be quickly done since we need to integrate Veracode into our DevOps environment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of the product depends upon the number of codes or the number of applications.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend those planning to use the solution check the system requirements and choose a solution that supports programming languages and .NET Framework versions that record scans.

I am not sure if it is one of the best solutions because I am not an expert in other solutions available in the market. Somehow, I personally feel it is one of the best tools in the market.

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
PeerSpot user
DevOps Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Drastically reduced post-deployment issues for us
Pros and Cons
  • "Before Veracode, the application was deployed to the production server and there would be a lot of bugs and issues. Once we implemented the Veracode scan, the full deployment issues were drastically reduced."
  • "One concern is that scans take a long time to run. We scan at the end of the day because we know it will take a lot of time. We leave it to run and the report will be generated by the next day when we arrive. The scanning time could be reduced."

What is our primary use case?

We use it to scan third-party libraries to check for vulnerabilities.

How has it helped my organization?

Our company relies on Veracode to prevent vulnerable code from going into production. 

And it reduces post-deployment bug fixes. Before Veracode, the application was deployed to the production server and there would be a lot of bugs and issues. Once we implemented the Veracode scan, the full deployment issues were drastically reduced. In a month we do 10 releases and we used to get five or six post-deployment issues. Now, we barely get one or two.

Veracode has also significantly saved us time, around 30 to 40 percent, and we can concentrate on new features instead of fixing the old ones.

What is most valuable?

We use the full code analysis and the recommendations from the Veracode report.

What needs improvement?

One concern is that scans take a long time to run. We scan at the end of the day because we know it will take a lot of time. We leave it to run and the report will be generated by the next day when we arrive. The scanning time could be reduced.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Veracode for the last three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable. I've never seen any downtime with Veracode.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We use it on-prem, so I'm not sure whether it can be scaled. It's just one endpoint that multiple people access.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have two scanning stages. The first one uses SonarQube, which only does code analysis. It doesn't scan third-party libraries that we use in our code. Veracode is the second level of check. We work on a banking project. The bank trusts Veracode and they recommended Veracode to scan our products.

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment was pretty straightforward. It's on-prem so there was no deployment strategy to follow. It took one to two days to deploy and check everything. A team of three to four people worked on the deployment. It depends on the project's complexity as well. As a DevOps engineer, I support a lot of projects within our organization, and the deployment varies from project to project.

In my department, we handle six to eight projects and each one needs a Veracode scan before deployment. As a company, we have multiple locations and departments but only the DevOps team of eight people has access.

The way we work with Veracode is that we have integrated it with Jenkins. We upload the artifacts to the server, trigger the Jenkins job, and the Veracode scan is generated. We have set everything from the Jenkins pipeline. The scan is automated using Jenkins, which means there is no need for maintenance. If there are new steps implemented in the pipeline, there might be some overhead, but it doesn't need any maintenance. We just set the port and everything works fine.

What other advice do I have?

Other than the scanning time, I would give it a solid eight out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Pradeep Kumar. - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder and Director at Bizcarta Technologies India Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 20
A broad and integrated platform that provides multiple test scenarios, but it is expensive and does not provide on-premise implementation
Pros and Cons
  • "The product provides guidance to develop secure software."
  • "On-premise implementation is not available."

What is our primary use case?

It is a broad and integrated platform. It provides multiple test scenarios and has the ability to do CI/CD pipeline integration. It is used for application security and vulnerability assessment.

What is most valuable?

Veracode provides guidance to develop secure software. It is one of the valuable features.

What needs improvement?

On-premise implementation is not available.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The product is deployed on the cloud. We have a multi-cloud environment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is expensive.

What other advice do I have?

Veracode’s policy reporting for ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations is good. The product's false-positive rate is low. If the tool is used effectively, vulnerable codes do not go into protection.

The SBOM feature helps identify risks in all third-party software. It is quite easy to create a report using the SBOM feature. It is an important feature. The solution provides visibility into application status at every phase of development. We have not integrated it.

Veracode has a good effect on our organization’s ability to fix flaws. Veracode has helped our developers save time. Veracode has a good impact on our organization’s overall security posture. The solution is probably not worth the money. The developers are more confident while fixing vulnerabilities due to the solution’s low false-positive rate.

Overall, I rate the tool a six out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Data Research Analyst & Business Development at DIS Research
Real User
Top 10
Reduces manual processes for us, saving significant time
Pros and Cons
  • "The main feature, and one of the most important, is the static code analysis. We are able to complete an analysis of the security flaws with this platform. It's very good at helping us find and fix flaws."
  • "The support team could be more responsive, and the dependency of users on the support team is too high and should be reduced."

What is our primary use case?

The most important purpose of this platform is code security. We are able to scan our code and find security flaws.

How has it helped my organization?

Veracode has saved us a lot of time because we have been able to reduce manual processes. We are able to do most things automatically with the platform. It has saved us between 30 and 40 percent of our time.

What is most valuable?

The main feature, and one of the most important, is the static code analysis. We are able to complete an analysis of the security flaws with this platform. It's very good at helping us find and fix flaws.

The sandbox environment is also one of the features we are using as well as integration with our CICD pipeline, which is very useful. The product is pretty easy to understand, which is quite good.

The policy reporting for ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations also helps us a lot.

It gives us visibility into application status at every phase. We have definitely seen an improvement in that regard.

For how long have I used the solution?

I'm pretty new to this platform. I'm going with a trial right now and have been using it for about a month. We have spent most of our time analyzing the code.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is also very scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The support team could be more responsive, and the dependency of users on the support team is too high and should be reduced.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This is the first such tool we are using.

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment was not very complex. It took us around 15 days because we were trying to understand the policies and many other things. Our team has 15 people and everyone was involved in making some decisions regarding the solution.

We have only needed help with the product itself. That's what we have reached out to their team for. But there hasn't been any maintenance of the product for us.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is a bit high. Although we are in a trial phase, if we are going to make the decision to purchase the software, the pricing is going to be high for us.

What other advice do I have?

We are able to justify the false positives because security flaws are one of the biggest things that Veracode's features help us with.

Overall, the product is good. It has made a very good impression. There are some flaws, as I have mentioned, but overall it looks very good, with the features I've mentioned. The impact on our security has been good. The main challenge for us will be the pricing, but if we ignore that factor, the impact has been very good and we would definitely implement Veracode.

I would suggest having a look at Veracode. Go for a trial of the system to see if Veracode is something that can help solve your problems. Pricing should be ignored because there are definitely some very specific features that help a lot. 

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Veracode Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Veracode Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.