Windows Azure CDN Reviews

I use Windows Azure CDN in my company to forward different stuff.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that one can access Windows Azure CDN from anywhere.

The high price of Windows Azure CDN is an area of concern where improvements can be made.

I have been using Windows Azure CDN for three years. I am an end user of the solution who mostly uses the solution with Azure Storage.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Almost 20 people in my company use Windows Azure CDN.

Windows Azure CDN is used daily in my company.

I rate the initial setup phase of Windows Azure CDN an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

The initial setup phase of Windows Azure CDN is easy.

The solution is deployed on a private cloud.

The solution can be deployed in a day.

One of my company's in-house teams was involved in the deployment process of Windows Azure CDN.

The price of the solution is too high. I rate the price of Windows Azure CDN a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is high. My company makes monthly payments towards the licensing costs attached to Windows Azure CDN, which comes to around 20 USD per user.

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

I use it to cache and download files quickly.

One of the most valuable aspects is the capability to store extensive datasets and objects in the cloud, enabling their download through shared access signatures.

Exploring shared access solutions with cloud accounts would be a beneficial choice.

I have been using it for about four years.

The initial setup is a straightforward process involving the creation of blog containers or file systems. It is intuitive, especially for those familiar with systems administration.

It comes at a relatively affordable cost.

I would recommend watching informative video training courses to ensure a proper understanding and emphasize the importance of implementing security measures effectively. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We use the solution to reduce latency for web applications of the customers. It takes only about 200 milliseconds to respond to the request code.

The solution's Points of Presence feature works the best. It helps customers save time and maintain caching. When a user sends a cache request, it checks the nearby CDN network and responds to the cluster instead of retrieving the servers.

The next release of the solution should include configuration for the three types of cache rules: missing, predictive, and bypass.

We have been using the solution for more than two years.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. It has been deployed in 100 metro cities.

We are already using Azure Cloud. Thus, instead of using third-party resources, our organization prefers Azure for its high resiliency, availability, and security level.

The solution's initial setup process is easy.

The solution's price is above the medium range. It is worth the value for money.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it a ten out of ten.

The most valuable feature of Windows Azure CDN is its effectiveness.

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

I have been using Windows Azure CDN for one to two years.

I rate Windows Azure CDN an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate Windows Azure CDN a nine out of ten for scalability. Most of our clients for Windows Azure CDN are enterprise businesses.

The solution’s technical support is very good. I rate the solution’s technical support a nine or ten out of ten.

Positive

I rate Windows Azure CDN a nine out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The solution’s deployment takes a few hours.

Windows Azure CDN is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.

I am working with the latest version of Windows Azure CDN.

Overall, I rate Windows Azure CDN a nine out of ten.