Hive Streaming vs Windows Azure CDN comparison

"The optimization of the network is a valuable feature."

"One of the tool's best features is its ability to handle edge cases. For instance, we encountered a situation where we needed to remove certain files from public access. The solution offered a purge feature that allowed us to remove these files. This feature ensured that the files were deleted from all edge servers. Subsequently, we were able to upload new versions of the files."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that one can access Windows Azure CDN from anywhere."

"The geolocation feature is very important because many colleagues travel worldwide and need to access information from anywhere. The product has improved security."

"The UI is very intuitive."

"We use the product for faster content delivery with low latency."

"It is a stable solution."

"The fact that it just delivers what it is supposed to do is its most valuable feature...The initial setup is very straightforward."

"One of the most valuable aspects is the capability to store extensive datasets and objects in the cloud, enabling their download through shared access signatures."

"Hive should let customers know about the carbon usage."

"Exploring shared access solutions with cloud accounts would be a beneficial choice."

"They should include configuration for cache rules."

"I believe Windows Azure CDN can improve monitoring and measuring overall end-user performance. Providing monitoring tools or agents that can be integrated into our pages would be highly beneficial. Setting up a custom domain with Windows Azure CDN involves proving domain ownership, which can take some time. The process is relatively straightforward if your DNS or domain registrar is already integrated with Microsoft. However, the verification process may be more time-consuming if you use a different service provider."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"We have experienced issues with switch connectivity."

"The high price of Windows Azure CDN is an area of concern where improvements can be made."

"I aim to enhance the reporting."

"Windows Azure CDN should lower its prices."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"It comes at a relatively affordable cost."

"The solution's price is above the medium range."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing is extremely high, almost 9 out of 10."

"The pricing of the solution depends on usage and varies based on the company's needs. If you want additional features like advanced logging, it will be pricier. However, it could be cheaper if you don't need those features. It all depends on the resources and requirements."

"The solution's price depends on how much traffic you have. So, it was okay for us. Payments are to be made on a monthly basis since one has to pay for what they used."

"I rate the price of Windows Azure CDN a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is high."