Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Parallels vs Sangfor

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Parallels
Based on 32 reviews.
Sangfor
Based on 92 reviews.
Sample Customers
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
Arsari Group _ PT Netmarks Indonesia, Izhevsk Elektromekhanicheskiy Zavod (IEMZ) _ Kupol, Abilene Diagnostic Clinic, Fylde Borough Council, YARSTROYREZE LLC, VSK Insurance House, Melenkovsky District of Vladimirskaya Oblast, Sofrigam SA, Antenna International, KingsGate Community Church, Norwegian American Hospital, Island Hotels Group, Medway Council, Medway Council, Voices of September 11th, MacDonald Training Center, Kansas Childrenês Service League, Scope,Next Generation Clubs, WTC Communications, Opera Australia, HSE Integrated, Danier, Bridgwater College, Kern County Mental Health, Tony Tiendas, Spears Manufacturing, Managed Insurance Services Inc., Intuitive Medical Software, M.J. Soffe, Mazda Motors, Israel Military Industries (IMI), Telfair, Upic Solutions, Teleflora, Fisher & Company
Parallels Desktop
Lytro, University of Washington, Slalom, Veeva Systems, Oklahoma Christian University
Sangfor aDesk VDI
Macau City University, 12306 Chinese Railway Customer Service Center, Bank of Communications Vietnam, Paiho Group Vietnam
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 3
Review 1 of 5
Customer Service
Review 1 of 22
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.