Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Logo

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Reviews

Vendor: Parallels
4.4 out of 5
2,370 followers
Start review

What is Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)?

ApplicationServer delivers applications, data and virtual desktops from a central location, providing continuous availability, resource-based load-balancing and complete network transparency.
Get the Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS), Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service), Microsoft App-V and more!
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is the #4 ranked solution in top Application Virtualization solutions and #9 ranked solution in top Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) solutions. PeerSpot users give Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is most commonly compared to Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service): Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service). Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 53% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
February 2025
Get the report
Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Featured Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) reviews

Read more reviews

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) mindshare

Product category:
Application Virtualization
As of March 2025, the mindshare of Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) in the Application Virtualization category stands at 16.5%, up from 14.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization

PeerAnalyst reports based on Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication VirtualizationMar 4, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 4, 2025Download
ComparisonParallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)Mar 4, 2025Download
ComparisonParallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft App-VMar 4, 2025Download
ComparisonParallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft Virtual ServerMar 4, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)4.226.8%92%125 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft App-V4.822.3%80%4 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Parallels Remote Application Server offers cost-effectiveness, robust performance, stability, and ease of use. It excels in simple app publishing, seamless management, and client compatibility across diverse platforms like Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. The intuitive interface and HTML5 client provide easy remote access. Its integration with security features like two-factor authentication enhances data control and access. Organizations highlight its ability to manage resources efficiently without extensive documentation, making it highly versatile and secure.
  • "Parallels Desktop allows me to run both Mac and Windows operating systems on a single machine, eliminating the need for separate Windows hardware."
  • "One valuable feature is the ability to securely use a wide range of devices to access the company's infrastructure."
  • "We can provision the servers without the need for another third-party solution."

Room for Improvement

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) requires improvements in delegation for AD Groups, performance monitoring, and automatic reconnection. Issues with printing and HALB stability need resolution. Simplifying updates and management, enhancing local support, and offering more flexibility are areas for enhancement. Needs exist for better endpoint monitoring, user interface customization, application virtualization improvement, and a reduction in Active Directory dependency. Pricing and migration processes could also be addressed for better user experience.
  • "A potential improvement could be reducing the dependency on Microsoft solutions for Parallels RAS."
  • "The product does not utilize SQL for reporting purposes. Also, it does not support some hypervisors similar to Citrix. These particular areas need improvement."
  • "Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

ROI

Users find it challenging to quantify the ROI from Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS). They believe that without it, their costs would increase significantly or their businesses might not survive. Some express that Parallels Desktop's investment is not substantial enough to calculate ROI. Overall, they feel that the service is worth the investment despite the difficulties in determining the exact financial benefits compared to alternatives.

Pricing

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) offers competitive and cost-effective pricing compared to alternatives like Citrix. Users appreciate clear pricing structures, but some find the subscription model limiting and desire more flexible per-user, per-month options. While deals can be negotiated due to the product's relative newness, users note that pricing includes a fixed monthly fee starting from 15 licenses. They recognize value despite initial high costs, but suggest exploring lower-cost versions for small businesses.
  • "The product is not expensive. I rate its pricing a three or four out of ten."
  • "It is inexpensive compared to one of its competitors."
  • "I don't like the subscription model because it feels like I have to pay every month. If Parallels could go back to the professional license, it would be much better."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) as a client gateway for accessing cloud platforms, supporting remote desktop access, and publishing applications. It serves as an alternative to Windows RDS for providing remote access across various devices, including Macs, Windows, Linux, and Android. Companies utilize Parallels RAS for remote application installation, load balancing for RDS infrastructure, and offering hosted services, facilitating seamless remote access to enterprise applications for geographically scattered users.

Service and Support

Technical support for Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is generally well-regarded for its responsiveness and knowledge. Many find the assistance helpful and accommodating. Some users experience challenges with time zones and initial ticket processes. Advanced support levels receive praise for effectiveness. Not all users need frequent support, but positive feedback is common when assistance is required. Several users suggest minor improvements at the first support level. Ratings often fall between eight and ten out of ten.

Deployment

Experiences with Parallels Remote Application Server's initial setup indicate it is generally straightforward. Some found additional complexity with multi-site setups or specific environments, but assistance from the vendor helped streamline the process. Simple configurations, such as single-server environments, were easier. Several users appreciated the ease of use compared to Citrix, noting minimal time required for setup. In more challenging environments, users managed complexity with support from Parallels, ultimately finding the process manageable.

Scalability

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is generally considered scalable, with many reporting smooth support for thousands of users. Some mention a slight delay, possibly server-related. They express satisfaction with scaling features, acknowledging that effective scaling may require additional technical understanding, especially in load balancing. A few noted no scalability challenges despite expanding server infrastructure. Many indicated no difficulties with scaling, while a few qualifiers expressed concerns over server shutdown processes outside operating hours.

Stability

Parallels Remote Application Server shows good stability, with most entities encountering minimal issues. Some versions had minor problems, quickly resolved through updates. Occasionally, stability concerns arise from licensing or client-side connectivity and configuration, but these are not widespread. When properly resourced, RAS performs reliably. It's noted that issues are often server-related rather than inherent to RAS. Overall, entities find it stable, with only rare complications impacting its consistent performance.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Hospitality Company
4%
University
4%
Media Company
4%
Construction Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Retailer
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Photography Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) was previously known as Parallels RAS.

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) customers

Arsari Group _ PT Netmarks Indonesia, Izhevsk Elektromekhanicheskiy Zavod (IEMZ) _ Kupol, Abilene Diagnostic Clinic, Fylde Borough Council, YARSTROYREZE LLC, VSK Insurance House, Melenkovsky District of Vladimirskaya Oblast, Sofrigam SA, Antenna International, KingsGate Community Church, Norwegian American Hospital, Island Hotels Group, Medway Council, Medway Council, Voices of September 11th, MacDonald Training Center, Kansas Childrenês Service League, Scope,Next Generation Clubs, WTC Communications, Opera Australia, HSE Integrated, Danier, Bridgwater College, Kern County Mental Health, Tony Tiendas, Spears Manufacturing, Managed Insurance Services Inc., Intuitive Medical Software, M.J. Soffe, Mazda Motors, Israel Military Industries (IMI), Telfair, Upic Solutions, Teleflora, Fisher & Company

Related questions

  • 11
When evaluating Application Virtualization, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 13
What advantages do you see with Citrix XenApp or Desktop Solutions?
  • 7
Any documentation about Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops with Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)?
  • 42
VMware Horizon View vs Citrix XenApp: which is the better product and why?
  • 19
What trends and challenges do you predict about Virtualization software for 2022?
  • 5
Do you have any PDF documentation for the Citrix Virtual Desktop solution?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Virtualization
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Logo
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
Microsoft App-V vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Logo
Microsoft App-V vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
Inuvika vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Logo
Inuvika vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)
See all alternatives