Microsoft App-V and Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) compete in the application virtualization category. Parallels RAS seems to have the upper hand due to its expanded feature set and ease of use.
Features: Microsoft App-V offers application isolation, centralized management, and seamless Windows integration. In contrast, Parallels RAS provides application delivery, desktop virtualization, and enhanced security features, positioning it as a robust solution for diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft App-V could enhance user-friendliness and reduce complexity in setup. A broader platform support would be advantageous. Enhancements in cloud integration capabilities could be another area of focus. Parallels RAS might benefit from a more competitive pricing model, expanding integrations with non-Windows systems and simplifying its advanced feature configurations for easier implementation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parallels RAS is known for its easy deployment and responsive customer support, making it simple for IT administrators to manage. Microsoft App-V integrates well within Windows ecosystems but can be more complex to set up initially, which might require more specialized knowledge.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft App-V offers a cost-effective option for Microsoft-based infrastructures, though its complexity might lead to hidden costs. Parallels RAS, while potentially higher in upfront cost, provides a comprehensive suite that can yield better long-term ROI by enhancing operational efficiencies, justifying the investment for many organizations.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
