We performed a comparison between Appian and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is excellent."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine"
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"Another advantage of this tool is its reports and records. You can maintain dashboards, layouts. If you with a Java solution, it takes six months time. If you use this tool, you can finish in one or one and a half months' time."
"Rapid development with low-code makes it easier to quickly get apps implemented and the time to break-even and ROI is much faster."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The support team responds fast."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"It has it's own built-in UI components and doesn't provide much flexibility to customize or extend those components."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and OutSystems. See our Appian vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.