We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"The technical support team is good...It is a scalable solution."
"It's a robust, mature product and you can do some really complex operations and analytics."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."
"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."
"I like the monitoring feature."
"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."
"It's easy to use."
"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"
"Google's technical support is very good."
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pros →
"We find that the search and access functionality is quite slow."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."
"It could be even more automated."
"The logging functionality could be better."
"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."
"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."
"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."
"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."
"It could be more stable."
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Cons →
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is ranked 26th in Log Management with 10 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) writes "Good logging and tracing but does need more profiling capabilities". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Azure Monitor, New Relic and Amazon CloudWatch. See our ArcSight Logger vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.