We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Zendesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Knowledge Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"It is just the fact that it is a one-stop shop for all project documentation. It is compared to storing things in files and directories and stuff like that. It provides the overall usability and accessibility of many projects and documents in one area."
"The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"Confluence is easy to use and integrate with other solutions, including social media platforms."
"It seems highly scalable. There are 500 end users using this solution."
"A simple tool for developers to write and record team decisions explaining the product that they are creating."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence it's very easy to use and there are different options."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"It is very easy to connect back and forth between the requester and the person fulfilling the ticket."
"It's a very stable tool, very powerful."
"I found the user experience with vendors on Zendesk to be straightforward, especially when it comes to understanding and searching for specific tickets. The search and navigation tools are easy to use, and I haven't encountered any issues with delays or communication gaps in ticket resolutions."
"The most valuable features of Zendesk Support are collaboration, reports, and a self-service portal. The customer and team can see all the information needed from the portal."
"It has good management, the ability to sign tickets based on content, the multi-channel support, the self service portal, the integration with Salesforce, the setup process, and the product features as we are currently using them."
"What is cool about Zendesk Guide is how it works together with others Zendesk products. Especially with support and with the analytics. Put those together for a small or medium-sized company and it's a really powerful tool."
"It's very convenient to use."
"Zendesk Support has a lot of good APIs."
"I'd like to see some improved reporting on usage."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"There needs to be a flexible pricing model, where we can pick and choose services and customize our pricing model."
"An area for improvement in Atlassian Confluence is encouraging more vital interaction among the project members or users involved. I was researching a tool that could be used for better interactions offline among users on a specific topic or discussion. That feature would make Atlassian Confluence better."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"I would like to see the text editor upgraded from its current limited abilities."
"Zendesk Guide could be improved by allowing us to put our assets in one location. What happens now for each article, for example, is we have to upload the images for that article to that location, so the image reuse is still not something that they have perfected. If they could allow us to update all the images in one location, and then pull the image from there, it would be easier when working on Multibrand projects. There are no Multibrand updates available—we have to update each brand manually. For my company, I have come up with an API tool which allows me to push the content to multiple brands together, but if you don't have something like that, you have to manually do it."
"The price of the solution should be reduced."
"They have something called Zendesk Explore, which isn't as good as what they had in place previously."
"You couldn't give administrative access to new hires."
"It wasn't easy to set up so we're only using a third of all of the features,"
"There is always a network issue with Zendesk. But we don’t know whether it is managed. The network issue is that when I call, it does not let us."
"The data you get when logged in to Zendesk Support differs from the data you get when you programmatically query Zendesk Support through its API because of a sync time delay."
"The solution could integrate better with QR codes from some websites such as Facebook."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 1st in Knowledge Management Software with 99 reviews while Zendesk is ranked 2nd in Knowledge Management Software with 57 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Zendesk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zendesk writes "Straightforward, very transparent, and very well organized". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Zoho Learn, whereas Zendesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Freshservice, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Moveworks. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Zendesk report.
See our list of best Knowledge Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Knowledge Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
