We performed a comparison between Avaya IX Meetings and Webex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the share information function."
"Interesting collaboration features."
"It is very easy to jump from one communication channel to another one. It is pretty clear and very easy to do. That is the thing that I like the most from Avaya and their suite."
"The video conferencing quality is better than that of other solutions."
"The most valuable option is screen sharing."
"The stream is very smooth. That's what I like about Webex. Other video conference solutions like Zoom sometimes freeze and get buggy, but Webex doesn't."
"The tool simplifies our work by allowing us to have hybrid meetings instead of always meeting in person, which saves time in organizing these meetings. It also offers good video quality."
"Webex's main feature is you get 1,000 participants per meeting by default and can join from 75 meeting units. You don't have to buy additional licenses."
"During Cisco training sessions, I found Webex effective in improving productivity. I benefited from the training. However, I can't speak for others using Webex for daily work or jobs."
"The product is quite secure. Other products, such as Zoom, have had security issues raised in the media."
"What I value most about Webex is its stability compared to other solutions."
"The installation could be more straightforward. I would like it to work with other meeting software in the next release."
"Increase in participant numbers reduces quality of video and sound."
"There isn't too much information about Avaya solutions and that could be very much improved. If you want some product support, you have to go through a business partner in Latin America and there aren't many partners."
"I would like for them to include a collaboration tool so that you can directly do a video call or audio call to your colleagues or anyone in the office."
"The solution could improve by adding a survey or form feature to show for the users to be able to vote or answer any questions."
"There's some difficulty in Webex, particularly when a third party needs access and that third party is not part of the domain of the company, it could be difficult."
"The solution could improve by having cross-platform compatibility. For example, if you wanted to have a call with someone with Microsoft Teams you could do it with Webex. Not everyone wants to use the same virtual meeting application."
"Sometimes, the solution lags because of performance issues."
"Some concerns are raised by the company's team when it comes to the screen portion of the tool. There is a need to hire engineers to deal with the aforementioned issue."
"It is not so easy to obtain information in areas like the number of participants, comments, and file transfers inside the application."
"I would like it if Webex's mobile interface had all the same application integration as the desktop. Maybe the applications work on mobile as well, but we have not tried it yet."
Avaya IX Meetings is ranked 19th in Virtual Meetings with 3 reviews while Webex is ranked 2nd in Virtual Meetings with 121 reviews. Avaya IX Meetings is rated 8.4, while Webex is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Avaya IX Meetings writes "A virtual meeting software with a useful share information function". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex writes "Used to conduct online third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings". Avaya IX Meetings is most compared with , whereas Webex is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, Skype for Business, TeamViewer, Zoom and Cisco TelePresence. See our Avaya IX Meetings vs. Webex report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
