We compared BMC Remedy and ServiceNow across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: BMC Remedy is commended for its user-friendly interface, valuable features, and impressive dashboards and reports. However, it could benefit from more intuitive dashboards and improved system stability. On the other hand, ServiceNow is highly efficient in workflow management, offers scalability, and provides customization options. Nevertheless, it could enhance the implementation of features and improve its user interface. Both products are considered expensive in terms of pricing and licensing, but ServiceNow is viewed as more reasonable for large organizations. Customer service and support for both products have received mixed feedback, with some finding it helpful and others suggesting room for improvement.
"The most valuable BMC Remedy Asset Management are the dashboards and reports for the CIO."
"This product is good because it allows us to receive proper responses to business emails anywhere and anytime. It helps in effective communication with employees. The solution is stable. The product is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend BMC Remedy, especially for its automation capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of BMC Remedy is to take administrative access of a user."
"The asset discovery feature in BMC is notably better compared to ServiceNow."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management is pretty easy for quite a lot of functions."
"We can create our own profile in BMC Remedy, track how many tickets we've closed on a daily basis, monitor how many SLAs we've escalated, and see how many tickets we've received daily."
"It had automation, orchestration, service level management, and event management. You could also integrate it for auto-remediation."
"There are a lot of features a customer can use. It’s an existing concept of asset management. One feature is the ability to create tickets for various computer systems, VPN defenses, sites, regions, or customers."
"I like ServiceNow's Workspace feature. With Jira, we had to edit a ticket by going into it. We couldn't perform edits from within the project plan. ServiceNow allows you to edit everything from one screen. It's like an Excel spreadsheet, but Jira requires you to drill down into the ticket. ServiceNow is more convenient if you are working on multiple projects and workflows."
"It allows us to filter the data, create graphs, and get detailed reports."
"It's great to do statuses or to review tasks."
"It's more about the ease of use of ServiceNow. Plus, everything is there in a single platform. If you need any additional functionality, you just need to enable the plugins without even installing anything on the servers"
"Good stable and scalable solution."
"ServiceNow is easy to use."
"The product's integration functionality in the change management module has significantly improved efficiency in our organization."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The product's scalability is one area with certain shortcomings that need to be considered for improvement."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management could improve by adding intuitive dashboards."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support."
"The solution must be flexible."
"The UI is quite outdated."
"I would like to have more customized reporting because the management team loves customized reports with graphs."
"The tool is very old."
"Could be more user friendly for admins to manage."
"System deployment and automation capabilities could be within the platform, similar to competitors."
"When it comes to reference fields, there are some limitations where you aren't able to use them, like in relationship queries. In Remedy, when you click a menu, you get options directly, whereas here, if you use a reference field, it points you to a different form. So the UI experience totally changes for the end user."
"It's moving at a very fast pace. It is difficult for developers or engineers to keep up with it. That's the only issue."
"The setup was time-consuming and required a lot of internal resources."
"Currently, we are finding it a bit difficult to monitor the subscriptions that are being used. The reporting feature related to this can be improved. Its ITOM functionality can be improved. BMC does a better job than ServiceNow in terms of capturing utilization and other such things."
"The solution is lacking in the mobile application area that could be improved."
"In an upcoming release, there should be more administration tools."
"Its stability and pricing need improvement."
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Asset Management with 212 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". BMC Remedy is most compared with BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR, ManageEngine IT Asset Management and BMC Track-It!, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our BMC Remedy vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
www.quora.com
The article linked above helps people select a help desk software based on the parameters suggested.
You can also try Happyfox, an online centralized ticket management software hosted on the cloud. It has light and clear pricing and leanest learning curve. Please check the set-up steps here. www.happyfox.com
Hult Internation Business school is currently using our help desk software. www.happyfox.com
Happyfox does provide special discounts for education institutions and please contact me for more information.
Hi Lawrence, I think you are opensource guy, so you may check it out
OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System with many features to manage customer telephone calls and e-mails. It is distributed under the GNU AFFERO General Public License (AGPL) and tested on Linux, Solaris, AIX, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Mac OS 10.x. Do you receive many e-mails and want to answer them with a team of agents? You're going to love OTRS!
github.com and try below release
www.otrs.com
1. Which software are you using and how do you find the software? Service Now, very useful. Is it easy to use and customizable? Yes. If so, how can we customize it? Forms, fields are easy to setup; business rules – java scripts, api.
2. What software did you use before the one you are currently using and did it offer a way to import existing tickets from your old system to your current one? CA and BMC. We did not import old tickets into the current systems. We imported assets. Change, Incidents, Request start from fresh. Old data was exported and kept as retention.
3. What about/How does licensing costs/work? Only IT roles are payable. As educational institutions face financial pressures, what are the costs and flexible options for payment? Cloud based subscription – based on usage.
4. Is your software on-premise and cloud/hosted/SaAS models? SAAS
5. Are you using any other of their modules/product offerings? If so, which ones? Catalog, Service Desk – incidents, problem, request, Change, Asset, CMDB, Discovery, KB, SDLC
6. What is it about the software that you like? Easy to use What is it that you dislike? Ease of version upgrades are managed but require testing for many hotfixes, some issues are moved to enhancement request within the platform and needs to move to the next version for resolution. Reporting is not as good for trending etc. However, OOB reports can be easily created with existing views. More scripting solutions should be made available to provide greater functionality.
7. What is it that you like about their company and support? Have timezone support with ease of ticket creation. What is it that you dislike? Some problems moved as next release enhancements; manual creation of MIBS / updates for discovery creation of correct models. No able to detect stack switches out of the box
8. Does your software have asset management (desktop, mobile, app and network), a solutions wiki? a help/chat ticketing system? etc. ITAM yes but has not moved onto SAM. Mobile not captured; workstations, servers, applications, business services, network are captured. Service Now discovery is very good as it is agentless but still need to be tweak to ensure proper creation especially on newer equipment and stack switches.
9. Has anybody used Cherwell? ServiceNow? FrontRange? BMC Track-IT? Service Now
Hi Lawrence. I work at Agiloft, and we use our own Service Desk solution. We have several customers successfully using Agiloft for higher education IT service management, including Texas A&M and Cal Poly.
Agiloft is completely customizable with no coding required - all customization is done using an easy drag-and-drop GUI. It's available as both an on-premise solution and SaaS, and includes modules for Asset Management, Customer Support, Integrated Chat, and more, with no additional per-module cost.
You can learn more at www.agiloft.com, or google "Agiloft reviews" to find plenty of thorough, 5-star reviews of our product, including several from our higher education customers. Hope this helps! Good luck!