We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The web-based approach is the most valuable feature."
"This is a centralized tool where we are able to schedule backups and perform monitoring."
"The management and ease of installation are the most valuable features."
"Rubrik is a very scalable and high-performing backup restore solution."
"The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance."
"Cut backup remediation to nearly nothing."
"Management is so simple that anyone can check the backups and do restores when necessary."
"Rubrik has made the process to manage backup and recovery painless. This frees up more time to work on other projects."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The web interface could benefit from some improvement, particularly in terms of alerting and dashboard clarity. The cloud web interface is somewhat confusing and could use more development attention. Additionally, it's essential to ensure that local on-premise management options remain available alongside cloud-based solutions, as internet availability can affect backup management. Regarding features, cross-hypervisor restore functionality would be a valuable addition, allowing for greater flexibility in restoring VMs across different environments."
"I have a personal want which might not necessarily make sense with Rubrik as a company or Rubrik as a software, but it'd be really nice if they could also handle things like item-level backups and restores of Active Directory objects and DNS and DCP objects."
"The solution's reporting feature could be better."
"I would love to be able to just get from the dashboard to a file that I need, or a system that I need."
"We would like to be able to do granular restores directly from Exchange. Also, more granular management of VM backups would help."
"Troubleshooting failed backups is difficult, and deciphering the logs without the help of support is usually almost impossible."
"There is room for improvement through a further extension of their Office 365 backup platform. In addition, it's still a bit cost-prohibitive to backup NAS. Those would be the two primary areas for improvement."
"It is not Windows Cluster-Aware at the moment or Exchange DAG-Aware. If they add support for these particular use cases, it would be even better."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 86 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors and global search allows for granular recoveries". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Azure Backup and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.