We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Deep Security is praised for its patch management feature and comprehensive security options. However, it needs improvement in pricing, technical support, and various functionalities. On the other hand, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is commended for its user-friendly interface and strong security protection. Suggestions for enhancements include documentation, compatibility, and performance. The pricing and licensing for both products are considered average or on the expensive side, depending on the user's perspective. The customer service and support for both products have received mixed reviews, with some users finding them satisfactory and others mentioning room for improvement.
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
"find some of the most valuable features to be the anti-malware, encryption, and the EDR launching service."
"Center Management"
"It is very efficient. I like its simplicity."
"I can easily manage over 300 computers antivirus from my desk."
"The user interface is easy to maintain once it is setup."
"The security and vulnerability assessment features are valuable."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a cost-effective solution."
"There is no competition for this product, as no other product provides HIPS, host-firewall, and anti-malware together."
"The tool provides information on server activities and hosts."
"The most valuable features of the solution we have enabled in our organization are its anti-malware capabilities, applications, web reputation, and integrity monitoring."
"There are compliance issues for legacy applications and after applying OS security patches. The product's HIPS (Host Intrusion Prevention System) modules do the job for you automatically, without any downtime."
"We use the solution to detect malicious threats, secure the endpoints, and disable the UFT."
"Technical support is good."
"The integration options of Trend Micro Deep Security have been particularly valuable."
"It integrates well with the cloud; for example, AWS, and Google Cloud Provider."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Detections could be improved."
"The support needs improvement."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"We have zero-day detection of malware but it cannot detect other types of unknown intrusions."
"Areas for improvement include signature update management and selecting the respective features on the endpoint side."
"The performance level could be better."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes."
"The solution needs to lower its pricing."
"We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system."
"I would like to see integration to many different systems easier."
"If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution."
"We'd like to have more application control."
"We are not very happy with Trend Micro Deep Security since it is not able to detect many viruses and bugs."
"The price could be reduced."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
"Another issue is if I want to suggest this solution to a customer, we won't get the pricing immediately, which is a major problem."
"There should be signature-based advanced and responsive features."
"The cost is very high."
"I would like to see XDR features and endpoint sensor become available."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 111 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.