We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"This is stable and scalable."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are the ease of use and it was available within the operating system."
"Within its class I think, it has a high and decent detection rate."
"Its threat intelligence feature is beneficial. This solution smoothly integrates with SIEM."
"It's an enterprise solution that provides a centralized console and it supports all the platforms that we use, including Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, and Android."
"The most valuable feature is ransomware protection, which can detect malicious activity from IPs or a malicious payload in DLLs, or other things that can corrupt the system."
"One of the valuable features of the solution is the small updates that keep my machine relatively clean from any infections."
"The biggest benefit to Windows Defender is that it is built-in to the operating system by Microsoft."
"I find the vulnerability management section of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint to be very useful for organizations."
"Seqrite has significantly reduced the time it takes to detect and respond."
"The solution installs very easily."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"It can get a bit laggy sometimes. Other than that, we don't have any issues. They constantly tweak it and fix it up based on users' feedback. It has improved a lot over the past four years. Defender for Endpoint never really used to be a good endpoint security solution, but over the past couple of years, Microsoft has invested heavily in it. So, it has come a long way in all aspects of endpoint security. If they want to make it better, they should just continue investing in the current path of what they've been doing over the past couple of years."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is effective for validating work, but not ideal for investigations."
"Lacks some additional integration."
"I would like to be able to set up any kind of protection I want in the firewall, any IP address or any number."
"I think Microsoft needs to improve some of the security aspects of Defender. The email part, in particular, needs to be improved in terms of security effectiveness."
"Microsoft support could be more knowledgeable."
"More integration with different platforms is an area for improvement for this product, and should be included in its next release."
"This solution needs to move beyond relying on virus definitions alone and protect the system using behavioral analysis of the processes that are running."
"The solution should focus on security, documentation, and simplicity for beginners."
"The security is too week and needs improvement."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 182 reviews while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is ranked 57th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 2 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is rated 4.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud writes "Reduces the time to detect and respond with moderate pricing". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Trellix Endpoint Security and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is most compared with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Norton Small Business.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.